Description
Define validity in one or two sentences. need it in next 22 hours buddy.
Define validity in one or two sentences. need it in next 22 hours buddy.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great! Studypool always delivers quality work.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Houston Community College System Political Divisions of The 1700s Essay
Compare and contrast the political divisions of the 1790's to the current political divisions in 2021. Identify two simil ...
Houston Community College System Political Divisions of The 1700s Essay
Compare and contrast the political divisions of the 1790's to the current political divisions in 2021. Identify two similarities and two differences. What party would you have been a part of in the 1790s?
Working with Families Discussion
After reading chapter 4 in textbook, Working with Families, answer the following question. Submit this assignment as a doc ...
Working with Families Discussion
After reading chapter 4 in textbook, Working with Families, answer the following question. Submit this assignment as a document.How do you effectively work with clients who present spiritual beliefs or ideas that are different or even in conflict with your own?Use MLA styleThe reading is: Read chapter 4, Ethically Informed and Spiritually Sensitive Practice, from textbook Kilpatrick, A. C., & Holland, T. P. (2009). Working with families: An integrative model by level of need (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
7 pages
Question 1662601
Today, society is being reformed by vast advances in information technologies such as telecommunication systems and comput ...
Question 1662601
Today, society is being reformed by vast advances in information technologies such as telecommunication systems and computers that have immensely ...
ENG 1A Pasadena City College Token Equality & Posing as Politics Essay
Looking primarily at two essays in Adolph Reed Jr.'s Class Notes--"Token Equality" and "Posing as Politics"--write a MLA-f ...
ENG 1A Pasadena City College Token Equality & Posing as Politics Essay
Looking primarily at two essays in Adolph Reed Jr.'s Class Notes--"Token Equality" and "Posing as Politics"--write a MLA-formatted essay that explores what Adolph Reed argues politics should concern itself with. Key to answering this question is understanding Reed's conception of the effective realm(s) in which to contest politics and effective ways to contest them.On pg. 168 of the book (in "Posing as Politics") Reed writes, "This dismissal of state-centered politics is a signal weakness of the left." What does Reed mean by this? In what ways does the critique he puts forward in this essay grapple with the notion of what is and is not effective politics? In what ways does he deconstruct faulty and ineffective modes of doing politics?One of the aspects of his critique of ineffectual politics is Reed's discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of "identity politics." How do identity politics politics blunt the edge of radical critiques and structural analyses of society? There are parts of other essay besides "Token Equality" and "Posing as Politics" that address questions and ideas in this prompt, so feel free to draw from them. Specifically, "Ethnic Studies and Pluralist Politics" offer insights you may find useful.*Your essay should be at least four pages.*Your essay should have at least 6-7 quotes from Class Notes*Please make sure your essay has an original title (this was something many of you didn't do for the first essay.)
6 pages
Maus Graphic Novel Rvsd.edited
Comparing and Contrasting ‘Maus’ To Other Forms of Prose Literature COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ‘MAUS’ TO OTHER FOR ...
Maus Graphic Novel Rvsd.edited
Comparing and Contrasting ‘Maus’ To Other Forms of Prose Literature COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ‘MAUS’ TO OTHER FORMS OF PROSE Maus, Graphic ...
phi103 week 2 discussion 2 Present three Deductive Arguments
Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first response in the discussion forum. The require ...
phi103 week 2 discussion 2 Present three Deductive Arguments
Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first response in the discussion forum. The requirements for this discussion are a minimum of four posts on four separate days. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.Week 2, Discussion 2 (Prompt option #1): Present three Deductive ArgumentsWe have learned this week about deductive reasoning, including what it takes for an argument to be deductive. This discussion allows us to practice identifying and evaluating examples of deductive reasoning.Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, read the instructor’s guidance and Chapters 3 and 4 (the required portions) of the textbook, and view required media for this week. Contemplate what it means to for an argument to be deductive.Reflect: Having studied the concept of deductive reasoning, find sources of reasoning, be it a detective novel, a political blog, a newspaper article, a TV broadcast, or some other source, and identify three arguments that you take to be deductive. If you have a hard time finding all three from media sources, you are able to create one or two of your own deductive arguments, on whatever topic you wish.Write: Present each argument in standard form (with the premises listed above the conclusion). After you have presented each argument, provide an explanation of why the reasoning is or is not valid. If the reasoning is valid, explain how the truth of the conclusion follows from the premises; if the reasoning is not valid, show how it would be possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, and discuss what it might take to make the argument valid.Hardy, J., Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). With good reason: A guide to critical thinking [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/*You must properly cite and reference the course text in every discussion. A citation is a parenthetical note within the body of your response. It comes after a direct quote or a paraphrase. A reference comes at the end of your response and refers to the required reading or material. Use in-text citations.
Similar Content
Please see Description
Please answers those philosophy questions discussion:Here are certain questions you could think about.1. Should we be self...
answer of 400 words with preferences.
Imagine that you are working as a human service professional to evaluate the developmental progress of children. Today, yo...
CUNY Hostos Community College History of New York Slaves Burial Beads Discussion
Summarizes Slaves Burial Beads free at Last by Sam Roberts A history of New York in 101 objects 200-300 words...
Walden University Trainee Ethical and Legal Issues Actions Attention Presentation
Supervision Case◦Your trainee has been acting in a peculiar manner. One day they come to the office dressed inappropriat...
George Mason University Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Policy Maker Letter
Select a cause, program, or pending legislation that is of interest to you. Write a 1-page letter to the appropriate publi...
McDaniel College Web Users Get as Much as They Give Paper
250 to 300 words with topic sentence, specific references, conclusion. If you agree or disagree....
Bil Of Rights Revised Wecompress.com
Adoption of measures for its own peace and safety . "Brandeis, Gitlow, and the Supreme Court's Transformation During the I...
A New Poblador Is Born Chilean Housing Finl
“A New Poblador is born” means the state of the housing system is deteriorating in Chile. and the number of slum settl...
The Pledge To Eliminate Poverty.essay
According to the Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, the countries which have the least reduction in extreme hunger ...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Shutter Island
by Dennis Lehane
Ethan Frome
by Edith Wharton
The Grapes of Wrath
by John Steinbeck
The Atlantis Gene
by S. A. Beck
Sula
by Toni Morrison
Little Women
by Louisa May Alcott
Shattered - Inside Hillary Clintons Doomed Campaign
by Amie Parnes and Jonathan Allen
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
by Mark Twain
The Catcher in the Rye
by J. D. Salinger
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Houston Community College System Political Divisions of The 1700s Essay
Compare and contrast the political divisions of the 1790's to the current political divisions in 2021. Identify two simil ...
Houston Community College System Political Divisions of The 1700s Essay
Compare and contrast the political divisions of the 1790's to the current political divisions in 2021. Identify two similarities and two differences. What party would you have been a part of in the 1790s?
Working with Families Discussion
After reading chapter 4 in textbook, Working with Families, answer the following question. Submit this assignment as a doc ...
Working with Families Discussion
After reading chapter 4 in textbook, Working with Families, answer the following question. Submit this assignment as a document.How do you effectively work with clients who present spiritual beliefs or ideas that are different or even in conflict with your own?Use MLA styleThe reading is: Read chapter 4, Ethically Informed and Spiritually Sensitive Practice, from textbook Kilpatrick, A. C., & Holland, T. P. (2009). Working with families: An integrative model by level of need (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
7 pages
Question 1662601
Today, society is being reformed by vast advances in information technologies such as telecommunication systems and comput ...
Question 1662601
Today, society is being reformed by vast advances in information technologies such as telecommunication systems and computers that have immensely ...
ENG 1A Pasadena City College Token Equality & Posing as Politics Essay
Looking primarily at two essays in Adolph Reed Jr.'s Class Notes--"Token Equality" and "Posing as Politics"--write a MLA-f ...
ENG 1A Pasadena City College Token Equality & Posing as Politics Essay
Looking primarily at two essays in Adolph Reed Jr.'s Class Notes--"Token Equality" and "Posing as Politics"--write a MLA-formatted essay that explores what Adolph Reed argues politics should concern itself with. Key to answering this question is understanding Reed's conception of the effective realm(s) in which to contest politics and effective ways to contest them.On pg. 168 of the book (in "Posing as Politics") Reed writes, "This dismissal of state-centered politics is a signal weakness of the left." What does Reed mean by this? In what ways does the critique he puts forward in this essay grapple with the notion of what is and is not effective politics? In what ways does he deconstruct faulty and ineffective modes of doing politics?One of the aspects of his critique of ineffectual politics is Reed's discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of "identity politics." How do identity politics politics blunt the edge of radical critiques and structural analyses of society? There are parts of other essay besides "Token Equality" and "Posing as Politics" that address questions and ideas in this prompt, so feel free to draw from them. Specifically, "Ethnic Studies and Pluralist Politics" offer insights you may find useful.*Your essay should be at least four pages.*Your essay should have at least 6-7 quotes from Class Notes*Please make sure your essay has an original title (this was something many of you didn't do for the first essay.)
6 pages
Maus Graphic Novel Rvsd.edited
Comparing and Contrasting ‘Maus’ To Other Forms of Prose Literature COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ‘MAUS’ TO OTHER FOR ...
Maus Graphic Novel Rvsd.edited
Comparing and Contrasting ‘Maus’ To Other Forms of Prose Literature COMPARING AND CONTRASTING ‘MAUS’ TO OTHER FORMS OF PROSE Maus, Graphic ...
phi103 week 2 discussion 2 Present three Deductive Arguments
Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first response in the discussion forum. The require ...
phi103 week 2 discussion 2 Present three Deductive Arguments
Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first response in the discussion forum. The requirements for this discussion are a minimum of four posts on four separate days. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.Week 2, Discussion 2 (Prompt option #1): Present three Deductive ArgumentsWe have learned this week about deductive reasoning, including what it takes for an argument to be deductive. This discussion allows us to practice identifying and evaluating examples of deductive reasoning.Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, read the instructor’s guidance and Chapters 3 and 4 (the required portions) of the textbook, and view required media for this week. Contemplate what it means to for an argument to be deductive.Reflect: Having studied the concept of deductive reasoning, find sources of reasoning, be it a detective novel, a political blog, a newspaper article, a TV broadcast, or some other source, and identify three arguments that you take to be deductive. If you have a hard time finding all three from media sources, you are able to create one or two of your own deductive arguments, on whatever topic you wish.Write: Present each argument in standard form (with the premises listed above the conclusion). After you have presented each argument, provide an explanation of why the reasoning is or is not valid. If the reasoning is valid, explain how the truth of the conclusion follows from the premises; if the reasoning is not valid, show how it would be possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, and discuss what it might take to make the argument valid.Hardy, J., Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015). With good reason: A guide to critical thinking [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/*You must properly cite and reference the course text in every discussion. A citation is a parenthetical note within the body of your response. It comes after a direct quote or a paraphrase. A reference comes at the end of your response and refers to the required reading or material. Use in-text citations.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents