Description
SOC 105 Week 10 Assignment (2) Society
Students, please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment" in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
Click the link above to submit your assignment.Media and Society
Assignment 2: Position Paper Two – Media and Society
Due Week 10 and worth 250 points
This is the second of two (2) position papers based on the following scenario to be completed in this course.
Imagine that you are running for a state office (e.g., governor, senator, or representative) and you have to prepare a position paper for a debate on controversial issues in the news. (Select one (1) of the topics addressed in Weeks 5-9 of this class.) You will want your position paper to demonstrate critical thinking, sound logic, valid claims, personal passion, and credible support that is cited correctly because the paper will be provided to the news media before the debate and will be scrutinized by the media and reported on regarding these criteria. Your professor will serve as your close advisor whose job is to review the paper and provide feedback to you on the paper’s strengths and weaknesses.
Write a three to four (3-4) page (800 to 1,300 words) paper in which you:
- Introduce your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. (It’s important to grab the audience’s interest and inform them of what the main and support points are.)
- Provide three or four (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. (Put each major point in a separate paragraph.)
- Provide one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view.
- Organized arguments and support for claims effectively.
- Demonstrate personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims.
- Provide two to three (2-3) credible and reliable references (in addition to the text) about current events, which have been published in the last five (5) years and are cited correctly in the position paper. (Wikipedia is not an acceptable source.)
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Apply critical thinking skills to the analysis of issues involving mass media and society.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in media and society.
- Write clearly and concisely about media and society using proper writing mechanics.
- Note: Depending on the student’s topic selection, the outcome measured might include one of the following:
- Evaluate the appropriateness of various media forms for different audiences.
- Analyze selected legal issues and policy regulations pertaining to the media.
- Determine how new forms of technology impact first amendment rights
- Analyze various issues affecting the media business.
- Evaluate the effects of new forms of media (e.g., online services) on social interactions.
- Evaluate the effects of the digital information expansion / explosion on society.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Click here to view the grading rubric.
Points: 250 | Assignment 2: Position Paper Two – Media and Society | ||||
Criteria | Unacceptable Below 60% F | Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D | Fair 70-79% C | Proficient 80-89% B | Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Introduce your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. Weight: 5% | Did not submit or incompletely introduced your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. | Insufficiently introduced your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. | Partially introduced your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. | Satisfactorily introduced your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. | Thoroughly introduced your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. |
2. Provide three or four (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. (Put each major point in a separate paragraph.) Weight: 40% | Did not submit or incompletely provided (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. | Insufficiently provided (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. | Partially provided (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. | Satisfactorily provided (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. | Thoroughly provided (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. |
3. Provide one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view. Weight: 15% | Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view. | Insufficiently provided one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view. | Partially provided one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view. | Satisfactorily provided one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view. | Thoroughly provided one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view. |
4. Organize arguments and support your claims effectively. Weight: 15% | Did not submit or incompletely organized arguments and did not submit or incompletely supported your claims effectively. | Insufficiently organized arguments and insufficiently supported your claims effectively. | Partially organized arguments and partially supported your claims effectively. | Satisfactorily organized arguments and satisfactorily supported your claims effectively. | Thoroughly organized arguments and thoroughly supported your claims effectively. |
5. Demonstrate personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims. Weight: 10% | Did not submit or incompletely demonstrated personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims. | Insufficiently demonstrated personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims. | Partially demonstrated personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims. | Satisfactorily demonstrated personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims. | Thoroughly demonstrated personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims. |
6. Provide two to three (2-3) credible and reliable references (in addition to the textbook) about current events, which have been published in the last five (5) years and are cited correctly in the position paper. Weight: 5% | No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. | Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 10% | More than 8 errors present | 7-8 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |
Explanation & Answer
Hi, kindly find attached
Running head: MEDIA AND SOCIETY
1
Media and Society
Student’s Name
Institution
Date
MEDIA AND SOCIETY
2
According to Mahatma Gandhi, the sole aim of journalism should be service to others.
Indeed, I believe in the spirit of being enshrined in this statement but what I do not support is the
limitation of what the press ought to report to the public at any point either by the government,
social groups or any entities whatsoever. The press plays a service role to any society since it is
composed of a section of the people to whom it reports and therefore curtailing its freedom is
more of depriving members of the society their rights which is inhuman and retrogressive in
some way (Hepp, Hjarvard & Lundby, 2015).
The reasons I am of the public opinion that the freedom of the press should be supported
is because of the following key points which I believe with time everyone will agree with and
stand for: the press plays the role of a representative, mediating between the leadership of the
day and the public. Secondly, the press has its rights guaranteed in the 1948 United Nations
declaration of human rights-it was indeed placed side to the freedom of worship and others thus
acting as the key indicator of a democrati...
Review
Review
