Search and EvaluateThis week, you will find three scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles on your topic. Remember that next week you will submit a paper on Scientific and/or Mathematical/Analytical perspectives of inquiry, so use this week’s assignment to prepare materials and collect information for that purpose.Use articles that will help you explain and describe scientific issues and/or statistical data or economic information related to your topic. You will analyze and evaluate these articles in your submission, which should include:A brief introductory paragraph.Three separate paragraphs, one for each of the three articles, each presenting:A brief 3–4 sentence summary of the article (use in-text citations)An explanation as to what makes this source credible (in the WCU Library go to Research Guides > Research Basics > Evaluating Resources)An explanation of why the article will be useful in addressing your problem or issueA brief conclusory paragraphAn APA Style reference list on a separate pageYour paper should be 1–3 pages in length (including the References page). Adhere to APA Style throughout.Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.Points: 20Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)General Education Standardized Rubric: Week 2 Written AssignmentGeneral Education Standardized Rubric: Week 2 Written AssignmentCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent10 to >8.9 ptsFully addresses all elements of the assignment and provides detail and quality examples. It is clear that the student fully understands the key issues.8.9 to >7.2 ptsAddresses most elements of the assignment. Few details or examples support the paper. It is clear that the student has a general understanding of the issues.7.2 to >5.9 ptsAddresses a few elements of the assignment; many are not addressed. Details and examples are missing. It is clear that the student does not understand many aspects of the key issues.5.9 to >0 ptsMost elements of the assignment are not addressed. There are no details or examples provided. It is clear that the student does not understand the key issues.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication6 to >5.34 ptsAssignment shows strong, insightful evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.5.34 to >4.32 ptsAssignment shows some evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.4.32 to >3.54 ptsAssignment shows little evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.3.54 to >0 ptsAssignment shows no evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.6 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics2 to >1.78 ptsThe writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.1.78 to >1.44 ptsThe writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.1.44 to >1.18 ptsThe writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.1.18 to >0 ptsThe writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources and APA Formatting2 to >1.78 ptsUses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources without errors. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment. The required number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.1.78 to >1.44 ptsAPA Style is used with few citation errors. Meets most length and formatting requirements of the assignment. Reputable audience-appropriate sources have been included but may not be well integrated. The source content minimally supports ideas.1.44 to >1.18 ptsReflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with many errors. Meets few length and formatting requirements of the assignment. At least one source is used but is not cited properly, is not reputable, or is inappropriate for the audience or topic. The source does not support ideas.1.18 to >0 ptsDoes not use APA style; there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet length or formatting requirements of the assignment. Sources are not provided.2 ptsTotal Points: 20

Week 2 - Assignment 1Health-Related Physical Fitness TestingReview Chapter 4 in the course text before completing this assignment. After completing a health history assessment and reviewing the Informed Consent, the next step in designing an exercise program for your special population, or any individual, is to assess the client’s initial fitness level. Physical fitness testing has many purposes such as providing baseline information about your client which can assist you in helping him or her develop fitness goals. In this assignment address the following prompts:Summarize three purposes of health-related physical fitness testing.Provide an example of a health-related physical fitness test for each of the following categories: body composition, cardiorespiratory endurance, muscular endurance, muscular strength, and flexibility.Your assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length (excluding the title page or reference pages) and formatted according to APA style Include the text as a reference.Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.