Unit 3: Case StudyDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 40 Submitting a file uploadIntroductionA case study analysis requires that you investigate a business problem, examine the possible and/or alternative solutions, and propose the most effective solution using supporting evidence.Read and examine the case carefully.Focus on the issues/problems.Brainstorm possible solutions or changes that need to be made.Select the best solution with reasoning.Unit Learning OutcomesEvaluate the role of developing skills to be an effective leader (CLO 2).Recognize how to apply conceptual skills when facing challenges (CLO 5).Identify how to utilize your strengths and the strengths of others to build a more effective team (CLO 4 and CLO 6).Case Summary - 6.2 The Strength to Stand OutThis case study provides a biography of Sociologist Dr. Brene Brown, research professor, speaker, and author, who studies difficult topics such as shame, vulnerability, courage, and empathy. Brene had moved several times as a child, moving from New Orleans to Houston to Washington D.C. and back to Houston. Moving as much as she did made her feel separate from others and when the marriage of her parents disintegrated, she even felt more alone. Brown believed though that her coping mechanism was studying people and understanding and recognizing the behavior patterns of others.Brown did not follow the traditional path to college; she traveled across Europe, engaged in self-destructive behaviors, and after having dropped out of college earlier, she graduated at 29 with a bachelor’s degree in social work. She became interested in qualitative research and the notion of grounded theory, and decided to study the topic of shame, despite the lack of support from her mentors.Brene eventually became a professor at the University of Houston, and instead of presenting her research in a traditional, peer-reviewed manner, she instead wanted to present her findings in a more mainstream manner. She self-published her first book and received enough recognition to attract a well-known publisher who would eventually republish it and continue her career. She is now a well-known speaker earning up to $100,000 per engagement and continues to present herself and her mission in her own form and her own way.DirectionsRead the full case study in the textbook: Case 6.2 The Strength to Stand Out.Answer the case study discussion questions.Submit your work for review. Case Study QuestionsBased on the strengths listed in Table 6.1, select five strengths that you think are descriptive of Brene Brown. Explain your answer.Based on your answer to the previous question, which of the 4 Domains of Talent Themes found in Table 6.2 (Executing, Influencing, Relationship Building, or Strategic thinking) do you think best apply to Brene? Which domain do you believe is her strongest? Explain.Which of the Values in action (VIA) character strengths (Table 6.3) would you attribute to Brene Brown?In applying the CAPP’s perspective, strengths are defined as “the things that we are good at and that give us energy when we are using them.” Based on the definitions for the CAAP’s categories:Identify and list Dr. Brene Brown’s “realized strengths.”What would you consider Dr. Brene Brown’s “unrealized strengths” to be?Can you identify any “learned behaviors” as defined by this model?Can you identify any “weaknesses” as defined by this model?Case Study RequirementsFull points will be earned if the case study(s):responds to every aspect of the assignmentcontains fully developed answersdisplays a familiarity with the related materials and topics being referencedExhibit the ability to apply the related concepts to the case study.Each question warrants a response that is well developed and is well-formatted.At least one page in length, typed, and double spaced.All cited material must include both internal citations and a complete reference list at the end of the paper.Due DateSubmit by 11:59 p.m., Sunday, CT.RubricCase Study RubricCase Study RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues or Problems10.0 ptsExcellentIdentifies and understands the main issues in the case study.9.0 ptsProficientIdentifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study.7.0 ptsSufficientIdentifies and understands some of the main issues in the case study.5.0 ptsDevelopingIdentifies and understands few of the main issues in the case study.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not clearly identify main issues in the case study.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch and Review10.0 ptsExcellentExcellent research with clearly documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.9.0 ptsProficientSatisfactory research with documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.7.0 ptsSufficientLimited research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.5.0 ptsDevelopingIncomplete research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryLittle or no research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis Solution Options10.0 ptsExcellentInsightful and thorough analysis of all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover all the key issues with descriptive well-reasoned and logical discussion.9.0 ptsProficientInsightful and thorough analysis of most all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover most the key issues with well-thought out reasoning and logical discussion.7.0 ptsSufficientInsightful and thorough analysis of some of the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover some of the key issues with solid reasoning and discussion.5.0 ptsDevelopingDeveloping analysis of the some of the key issues. Further development is needed. Alternative solutions/options cover few of the key issues with minimal reasoning and discussion.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryIncomplete analysis of the key issues. Incomplete solutions/options without sound reasoning or discussion.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Organization Format10.0 ptsExcellentWriting is free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear, concise, and creative presentation of ideas. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.9.0 ptsProficientWriting is mostly free of grammar and spelling errors. Most ideas are clearly presented. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.7.0 ptsSufficientWriting contains several spelling or grammatical errors. Some ideas are clearly presented and organized. Sources are identified with errors in APA format.5.0 ptsDevelopingWriting contains many errors with grammatical mistakes. Ideas are difficult to follow. Sources are not identified or errors in APA format.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryErrors in grammar and spelling distract from the overall message. Ideas are incomplete. APA format was not used correctly.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 40.0PreviousNext

Assigning team members to task roles is a delicate and critical task. When done correctly, the team members will be excited about their role on the project, feel confident they can successfully complete the tasks assigned, and know they will have some conquerable challenges as they move through the project. To effectively assign tasks to people (and people to tasks), the project manager must perform the following: Identify the roles needing to be filled. Determine the skills required for each role. Determine the skill sets of the team members. Assign team members to roles. The objective for this assignment is to effectively select your team from the following people: Pat is available for 24 hours a week at $115 per hour. Pat was involved in several upgrade projects for this package and can act as business analyst, developer, or tester. Pat is very comfortable with the legacy system and does not see the benefit of moving to the Web-based version. He feels that the end users do not fully utilize the functionality they already have and will not use this new functionality effectively. Terry is available for 24 hours a week at $100 per hour. Terry was involved in the original installation and every upgrade since then. She tends to be in developer or tester roles for this system but acts as business analyst for other systems. She is very excited about the Web-based package and the functionality it provides. She is concerned, however, that the end users do not have the computer savvy to use it. Robin is available for 30 hours per week at $100 per hour. She was involved in the last two upgrades as a business analyst and has been trying to become involved in other systems and business areas. She was actively involved in the development of a custom Web-based application as a programmer. This was considered a skills development opportunity because her Web programming skills are not strong. Chris is available for 24 hours per week at $80 per hour. He is new to the IT department; he was previously a customer service representative. He just completed his undergraduate degree in computer science and has experience with Web programming and software testing techniques. Jan is available for 16 hours per week at $115 per hour. Jan is also new to the IT department. She was previously a consultant and was on process reengineering projects, including several for billing functions. She previously worked with the Web version product of the vendor’s competitor. Assignment Guidelines: In this assignment, you are planning to fill the roles for the following 3 positions: End user Business analyst Team leader For each role, Describe the main responsibilities of the role. Identify the skills that are necessary. Select one of the candidates listed in the assignment description, and thoroughly explain why you have chosen each person for his or her role. Explain any conflicts or problems that you encountered while making your selections. 1250 words Use correctly APA style formatted references of solid academic quality for your resources and use correctly formatted APA style in-text citations to your references to substantiate your information