MGT320 Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 6 Criteria Meets Expectation Content, Research, and Analysis 13‐15 Points Requirements The paper includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 17‐20 Points Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of course content, including identification of intellectual property and related issues; includes citation of a relevant case and correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 17‐20 Points Analysis Provides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of selected issue that arises out of intellectual property ethics and infringement. 17‐20 Points Application of Sources well or Source adequately chosen to Material provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material. Mechanics and Writing 9‐10 Points Demonstrates Project is clearly college‐level organized, well written, proficiency in and in proper format as organization, outlined in the grammar and assignment. Strong style. sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. Content Demonstrates proper use of APA style. 9‐10 Points Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU‐ Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error. Total points possible = 95 Approaches Expectation 10‐12 Points The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Below Expectation Limited Evidence 7‐9 Points The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 9‐12 Points Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4‐6 Points The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 5‐8 Points Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 13‐16 Points Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis. 9‐12 Points Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis. 5‐8 Points Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis. 13‐16 Points Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources. 9‐12 Points Major problems with selection and linkage of sources. 5‐8 Points Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course. 7‐8 Points Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 5‐6 Points Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 5‐6 Points Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU‐Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors. 3‐4 Points Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 13‐16 Points Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 7‐8 Points Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU‐Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors. 3‐4 Points Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU‐ Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.
Purchase answer to see full attachment