Homework Model TWO

User Generated

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzvvvv

Health Medical

Description

My course is Accounting for HealthCare Organizations:

  1. Discuss the differences between cash and accrual accounting. What is one significant advantage of accrual accounting over cash accounting?
  2. True or false? Not-for-profit health care organizations segregate their net assets between paid-in capital and retained earnings, with paid-in capital representing donor contributions for capital asset acquisition, and retained earnings representing accumulated operating profits and losses. Explain your answer.
  3. Describe four methods for valuing assets and explain the strengths and weaknesses of each.
  4. Using the Stanford Health Care Consolidated Financial Statements for 2014 (including 2013 data), prepare a brief summary (3 -4 paragraphs) that highlights the current finanical status of Standford and any significant changes between 2013 and 2014. Include a review of the relationship between the three major statements - balance sheets, operating, and cash flows.
  • APA Format - with title page and reference page.
    • APA Format - with title page and reference page
    • Headings - one heading for each question (brief summary of the question)
    • Length will vary, but it should be significant enough to fully answer each question; the length for each question will also vary

# 2-3 pages.

I attached the Assignment Rubric, Please focus on it.Please I want My Total Points: 100.

Also, I attached the chapters 5-6, Please read it.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Criteria Responsiveness Ratings 25.0 pts Exemplary & Exceeds Expectations • Responds to assigned or selected topic; • Goes very much beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated, etc.); • Is extremely substantive and evidence based; • Very clearly demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content Criteria Pts 22.5 pts Above Average 20.0 pts Proficient 15.0 pts Progressing 10.0 pts Emerging • Responds to assigned or selected topic; • Goes somewhat beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated, etc.); • Is somewhat substantive and evidence based; • Clearly demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content • Responds to assigned or selected topic; • Is substantive and evidence based; • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the class resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content • Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or • Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and/or • Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the class resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or • Is submitted by the due date. • Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or • Relies primarily on anecdotal evidence; and/or • Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the class resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or • Is submitted past the late deadline Ratings 0.0 pts Not Acceptable or Not Done N/A 25.0 pts Pts Content Knowledge 30.0 pts Exemplary & Exceeds Expectations • Extremely indepth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions) showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects to them to other ideas; • Extremely Rich and relevant examples; • Extremely thoughtprovoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives; • Original and critical thinking; and • Extreme mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. 27.0 pts Above Average 24.0 pts Proficient 18.0 pts Progressing 12.0 pts Emerging • Somewhat indepth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions) showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects to them to other ideas; • Somewhat rich and relevant examples; • Somewhat thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives; • Somewhat Original and critical thinking; and • Somewhat mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. • Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course demonstrating that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented; • Relevant examples • Thoughtprovoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking; and • Critical thinking; and • Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course. • Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, while generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors; and/or • Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or • Few if any thoughtprovoking ideas, little original thinking; and/or “Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking; • Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills or strategies presented in the course. • A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course and/or application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or errors; and/or • No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or • No thoughtprovoking ideas or original thinking; and/or • No critical thinking; and/or • Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. 0.0 pts Not Acceptable or Not Done N/A 30.0 pts Criteria Ratings Critical Analysis 25.0 pts Exemplary & Exceeds Expectations Exemplifies one or more of the following: 1) Very clearly identifies the challenge and subsidiary, embedded, or implicit aspects of the issue. Identifies integral relationships essential to analyzing the issue. 2) Uses extremely relevant contexts and assumptions regarding the situation, problem. Very clearly identifies all data or information necessary to problem. 3) Very clearly presents and justifies own view or hypothesis while qualifying or integrating contrary views or interpretations. Demonstrates firm understanding of how facts shape but may not confirm opinion. Recognizes bias, including selection bias. 4) Very clearly identifies, discusses, and extends conclusions, implications, and consequences. Considers context, assumptions, data, and evidence. Qualifies own assertions with balance. Conclusions are qualified as the best available evidence within the context. Consequences are considered and integrated. Implications are clearly developed, and consider ambiguities. 22.5 pts Above Average Exemplifies one or more of the following: 1) Clearly identifies the challenge and subsidiary, embedded, or implicit aspects of the issue. Identifies integral relationships essential to analyzing the issue. 2) Often uses the relevant contexts and assumptions regarding the situation, problem. Clearly identifies all data or information necessary to problem. 3) Clearly presents and justifies own view or hypothesis while qualifying or integrating contrary views or interpretations. Demonstrates understanding of how facts shape but may not confirm opinion. Recognizes bias, including selection bias. 4) Identifies, discusses, and extends conclusions, implications, and consequences. Considers context, assumptions, data, and evidence. Qualifies own assertions with balance. Conclusions are qualified as the best available evidence within the context. Consequences are considered and integrated. Implications are somewhat clearly developed, and consider ambiguities. 20.0 pts Proficient emonstrates one or more of the following: 1) Summarizes issue, though some aspects are incorrect or confused. Nuances and key details are missing or glossed over. 2) Uses the relevant contexts and assumptions regarding the situation, problem, but in a limited way. Identifies most data or information necessary to problem. 3) Presents and justifies own position without addressing other views, or does so superficially. Discerns fact from opinion and may recognize bias in evidence, although attribution is inappropriate.Conclusions consider or provide evidence of consequences extending beyond a single discipline or issue. Presents implications that may impact other people or issues. Presents conclusions as relative and only loosely related to consequences. Implications may include vague reference to conclusions. Pts 15.0 pts Progressing Demonstrates one or more of the following: 1) Does not attempt to, or fails to, identify issue and summarize accurately. 2) Does not use the data presented in the situation, problem. Fails to identify data or information necessary to problem. 3) Fails to present and justify opinion(s) solution(s). Does not distinguish among fact, opinion, and value judgments. 4) Fails to identify conclusions, implications, and consequences, or conclusion is a simplistic summary. Conclusions presented as absolute, and may attribute conclusion to external authority. 0.0 pts Not Acceptable or Not Done N/A 25.0 pts ١٠ /٩ /٢٠١٨ Homework Module 1 Criteria Ratings Quality of Writing 20.0 pts Exemplary & Exceeds Expectations • Uses language that is extremely clear, concise, and appropriate • Uses formal writing per APA guidelines (no contractions, colloquialisms, etc.) • Has NO errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax • Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader • Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes VERY sparingly and only when absolutely necessary and/or appropriate • Always provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it • Is formatted precisely and in its entirety per APA Guidelines for scholarly works (citations, references, reference page, header, paragraphs, font, title page, etc.) Pts 18.0 pts Above Average 16.0 pts Proficient 12.0 pts Progressing • Uses language that is very clear, concise, and appropriate • Uses formal writing per APA guidelines (no contractions, colloquialisms, etc.) • Has very few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax • Is well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader • Uses original language often and uses direct quotes VERY sparingly and only when absolutely necessary and/or appropriate • Almost always provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it • Is formatted per APA Guidelines for scholarly works (citations, references, reference page, header, paragraphs, font, title page, etc.) • Uses language that is clear; • Has a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; • Is well organized, logical, and clear; • Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate; • Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.• Is mostly formatted per APA Guidelines for scholarly work • Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate; and/or • Has more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and/or • Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow; and/or • Reflects an under use of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases; and/or • Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.• Has several errors in regards to APA formatting guidelines 8.0 pts Emerging • Uses unclear and inappropriate language; and/or • Has many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and/or • Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader; and/or • Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language; and/or • Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.• Has numerous formatting issues in regards to APA formatting guidelines 0.0 pts Not Acceptable or Not Done N/A 20.0 pts Total Points: 100.0 5/5 Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner Scanned by CamScanner
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

...


Anonymous
This is great! Exactly what I wanted.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags