Criteria
Responsiveness
Ratings
25.0 pts
Exemplary &
Exceeds
Expectations
• Responds to
assigned or
selected topic; •
Goes very much
beyond what is
required in some
meaningful way
(e.g., ideas
contribute a new
dimension to what
we know about the
topic, unearths
something
unanticipated,
etc.); • Is extremely
substantive and
evidence based; •
Very clearly
demonstrates that
the student has
read, viewed, and
considered the
resources in the
course and that the
paper topic
connects in a
meaningful way to
the course content
Criteria
Pts
22.5 pts
Above Average
20.0 pts
Proficient
15.0 pts
Progressing
10.0 pts
Emerging
• Responds to
assigned or
selected topic; •
Goes somewhat
beyond what is
required in some
meaningful way
(e.g., ideas
contribute a new
dimension to what
we know about the
topic, unearths
something
unanticipated,
etc.); • Is
somewhat
substantive and
evidence based; •
Clearly
demonstrates that
the student has
read, viewed, and
considered the
resources in the
course and that
the paper topic
connects in a
meaningful way to
the course content
• Responds to
assigned or
selected
topic; • Is
substantive
and evidence
based; •
Demonstrates
that the
student has
read, viewed,
and
considered
the class
resources in
the course
and that the
paper topic
connects in a
meaningful
way to the
course
content
• Somewhat
misses the
point of the
assigned or
selected topic;
and/or • Lacks
in substance,
relying more on
anecdotal than
scholarly
evidence;
and/or •
Contains little
evidence that
the student has
read, viewed,
and considered
the class
resources in
the course and
that the paper
topic connects
in a meaningful
way to the
course content;
and/or • Is
submitted by
the due date.
• Misses the
point of the
assigned or
selected
topic; and/or
• Relies
primarily on
anecdotal
evidence;
and/or •
Contains little
evidence that
the student
has read,
viewed, and
considered
the class
resources in
the course
and that the
paper topic
connects in a
meaningful
way to the
course
content;
and/or • Is
submitted
past the late
deadline
Ratings
0.0 pts
Not
Acceptable
or Not
Done
N/A
25.0 pts
Pts
Content
Knowledge
30.0 pts
Exemplary &
Exceeds
Expectations
• Extremely indepth
understanding and
application of
concepts and
issues presented
in the course (e.g.,
insightful
interpretations or
analyses; accurate
and perceptive
parallels, ideas,
opinions, and
conclusions)
showing that the
student has
absorbed the
general principles
and ideas
presented and
makes inferences
about the
concepts/issues or
connects to them
to other ideas; •
Extremely Rich
and relevant
examples; •
Extremely
thoughtprovoking
ideas
and
interpretations,
original thinking,
new perspectives;
• Original and
critical thinking;
and • Extreme
mastery and
thoughtful/accurate
application of
knowledge and
skills or strategies
presented in the
course.
27.0 pts
Above Average
24.0 pts
Proficient
18.0 pts
Progressing
12.0 pts
Emerging
• Somewhat indepth
understanding and
application of
concepts and
issues presented
in the course (e.g.,
insightful
interpretations or
analyses; accurate
and perceptive
parallels, ideas,
opinions, and
conclusions)
showing that the
student has
absorbed the
general principles
and ideas
presented and
makes inferences
about the
concepts/issues or
connects to them
to other ideas; •
Somewhat rich
and relevant
examples; •
Somewhat
thought-provoking
ideas and
interpretations,
original thinking,
new perspectives;
• Somewhat
Original and critical
thinking; and •
Somewhat mastery
and
thoughtful/accurate
application of
knowledge and
skills or strategies
presented in the
course.
•
Understanding
and
application of the
concepts and
issues presented
in the course
demonstrating
that the student
has absorbed the
general principles
and
ideas presented;
• Relevant
examples •
Thoughtprovoking
ideas and
interpretations,
some original
thinking; and •
Critical thinking;
and • Mastery
and application of
knowledge
and skills or
strategies
presented in the
course.
• Minimal
understanding of
concepts and
issues presented
in the course,
and, while
generally
accurate,
displays some
omissions and/or
errors; and/or •
Few and/or
irrelevant
examples; and/or
• Few if any
thoughtprovoking
ideas, little
original thinking;
and/or
“Regurgitated”
knowledge rather
than critical
thinking; • Little
mastery of skills
and/or
numerous errors
when using the
knowledge,
skills or strategies
presented in the
course.
• A lack of
understanding
of the concepts
and issues
presented in the
course and/or
application is
inaccurate and
contains many
omissions and/or
errors; and/or •
No examples or
irrelevant
examples; and/or
• No
thoughtprovoking
ideas or original
thinking; and/or •
No
critical thinking;
and/or • Many
critical errors
when applying
knowledge,
skills, or
strategies
presented in the
course.
0.0 pts
Not
Acceptable
or Not
Done
N/A
30.0
pts
Criteria
Ratings
Critical Analysis
25.0 pts
Exemplary &
Exceeds
Expectations
Exemplifies one or
more of the following:
1) Very clearly
identifies the
challenge and
subsidiary,
embedded, or implicit
aspects of the issue.
Identifies integral
relationships
essential to analyzing
the issue. 2) Uses
extremely relevant
contexts and
assumptions
regarding the
situation, problem.
Very clearly identifies
all data or information
necessary to
problem. 3) Very
clearly presents and
justifies own view or
hypothesis while
qualifying or
integrating contrary
views or
interpretations.
Demonstrates firm
understanding of how
facts shape but may
not confirm opinion.
Recognizes bias,
including selection
bias. 4) Very clearly
identifies, discusses,
and extends
conclusions,
implications, and
consequences.
Considers context,
assumptions, data,
and evidence.
Qualifies own
assertions with
balance. Conclusions
are qualified as the
best available
evidence within the
context.
Consequences are
considered and
integrated.
Implications are
clearly developed,
and consider
ambiguities.
22.5 pts
Above Average
Exemplifies one or
more of the following:
1) Clearly identifies
the challenge and
subsidiary,
embedded, or implicit
aspects of the issue.
Identifies integral
relationships
essential to analyzing
the issue. 2) Often
uses the relevant
contexts and
assumptions
regarding the
situation, problem.
Clearly identifies all
data or information
necessary to
problem. 3) Clearly
presents and justifies
own view or
hypothesis while
qualifying or
integrating contrary
views or
interpretations.
Demonstrates
understanding of how
facts shape but may
not confirm opinion.
Recognizes bias,
including selection
bias. 4) Identifies,
discusses, and
extends conclusions,
implications, and
consequences.
Considers context,
assumptions, data,
and evidence.
Qualifies own
assertions with
balance. Conclusions
are qualified as the
best available
evidence within the
context.
Consequences are
considered and
integrated.
Implications are
somewhat clearly
developed, and
consider ambiguities.
20.0 pts Proficient
emonstrates one or more
of the following: 1)
Summarizes issue, though
some aspects are
incorrect or confused.
Nuances and key details
are missing or glossed
over. 2) Uses the relevant
contexts and assumptions
regarding the situation,
problem, but in a limited
way. Identifies most data
or information necessary
to problem. 3) Presents
and justifies own position
without addressing other
views, or does so
superficially. Discerns fact
from opinion and may
recognize bias in
evidence, although
attribution is
inappropriate.Conclusions
consider or provide
evidence of
consequences extending
beyond a single discipline
or issue. Presents
implications that may
impact other people or
issues. Presents
conclusions as relative
and only loosely related to
consequences.
Implications may include
vague reference to
conclusions.
Pts
15.0 pts
Progressing
Demonstrates
one or more of
the following:
1) Does not
attempt to, or
fails to, identify
issue and
summarize
accurately. 2)
Does not use
the data
presented in
the situation,
problem. Fails
to identify data
or information
necessary to
problem. 3)
Fails to present
and justify
opinion(s)
solution(s).
Does not
distinguish
among fact,
opinion, and
value
judgments. 4)
Fails to identify
conclusions,
implications,
and
consequences,
or conclusion
is a simplistic
summary.
Conclusions
presented as
absolute, and
may attribute
conclusion to
external
authority.
0.0 pts
Not
Acceptable
or Not
Done
N/A
25.0 pts
١٠ /٩ /٢٠١٨
Homework Module 1
Criteria
Ratings
Quality of
Writing
20.0 pts
Exemplary &
Exceeds
Expectations
• Uses language
that is extremely
clear, concise, and
appropriate • Uses
formal writing per
APA guidelines (no
contractions,
colloquialisms, etc.)
• Has NO errors in
spelling, grammar,
and syntax • Is
extremely well
organized, logical,
clear, and never
confuses the reader
• Uses a
preponderance of
original language
and uses direct
quotes VERY
sparingly and only
when absolutely
necessary and/or
appropriate •
Always provides
information about a
source when citing
or paraphrasing it •
Is formatted
precisely and in its
entirety per APA
Guidelines for
scholarly works
(citations,
references,
reference page,
header,
paragraphs, font,
title page, etc.)
Pts
18.0 pts
Above Average
16.0 pts
Proficient
12.0 pts
Progressing
• Uses language
that is very clear,
concise, and
appropriate • Uses
formal writing per
APA guidelines
(no contractions,
colloquialisms,
etc.) • Has very
few if any errors in
spelling, grammar,
and syntax • Is
well organized,
logical, clear, and
never confuses
the reader • Uses
original language
often and uses
direct quotes
VERY sparingly
and only when
absolutely
necessary and/or
appropriate •
Almost always
provides
information about
a source when
citing or
paraphrasing it • Is
formatted per APA
Guidelines for
scholarly works
(citations,
references,
reference page,
header,
paragraphs, font,
title page, etc.)
• Uses
language
that is clear;
• Has a few
errors in
spelling,
grammar,
and syntax; •
Is well
organized,
logical, and
clear; • Uses
original
language
and uses
direct quotes
when
necessary
and/or
appropriate;
• Provides
information
about a
source when
citing or
paraphrasing
it.• Is mostly
formatted
per APA
Guidelines
for scholarly
work
• Uses
language that
is unclear
and/or
inappropriate;
and/or • Has
more than
occasional
errors in
spelling,
grammar, and
syntax; and/or •
Is poorly
organized, is at
times unclear
and confusing,
and has some
problems with
logical flow;
and/or •
Reflects an
under use of
original
language and
an overuse of
direct quotes
and
paraphrases;
and/or •
Sometimes
lacks
information
about a source
when citing or
paraphrasing
it.• Has several
errors in
regards to APA
formatting
guidelines
8.0 pts
Emerging
• Uses unclear
and
inappropriate
language;
and/or • Has
many errors in
spelling,
grammar, and
syntax; and/or
• Lacks
organization in
a way that
creates
confusion for
the reader;
and/or •
Contains many
direct quotes
from original
source
materials
and/or
consistently
and poorly
paraphrases
rather than
using original
language;
and/or • Lacks
information
about a source
when citing or
paraphrasing
it.• Has
numerous
formatting
issues in
regards to
APA
formatting
guidelines
0.0 pts
Not
Acceptable
or Not
Done
N/A
20.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
5/5
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned by CamScanner
Purchase answer to see full
attachment