Aversa1
Professor Chia
International Business
18 September 2018
Political and Economic Reform in Myanmar
1. What explains the economic stagnation of Myanmar until very recently?
2. What do you think motivated the government of Myanmar to start undertaking political and
economic reforms from 2010 onward?
3. How would you characterize the nature of the economic reforms now being implemented in
Myanmar? What is the government trying to do here? What do you think the results will be?
4. What potential impediments do you think might stand in the way of further improvements in
Myanmar?
5. In November 2015, the democratic opposition won a landslide victory in a general election.
How do you think this will affect Myanmar’s economic growth trajectory going forward?
What are the risks here?
Political and Economic Reform in Myanmar
For decades, the Southeast Asian nation of Myanmar (formerly known as Burma) was an international pariah. Ruled by a brutal
military dictatorship since the 1960s, political dissent was not tolerated, the press was tightly controlled, and opposition parties
were shut down. Much economic activity was placed in the hands of the state—which effectively meant the hands of the military
elite, who siphoned off economic profits for their own benefit. Corruption was rampant. In the 1990s, America and the European
Union imposed sweeping economic sanctions on the country to punish the military junta for stealing elections and jailing
opponents. The de facto leader of the country's democratic opposition movement, Nobel Peace Prize-winner Aung San Suu Kyi,
was repeatedly placed under house arrest from 1989 through 2010.
None of this was good for the country's economy. Despite having a wealth of natural resources including timber, minerals, oil,
and gas—the economy stagnated while its Southeast Asian neighbors flourished. By 2012, Myanmar's GDP per capita was $1,400.
In neighboring Thailand, it was $10,000 per capita. The economy was still largely rural, with 70 percent of the country's nearly 60
million people involved in agriculture. This compares with 8.6 percent in Thailand. Few people own cars or cell phones, and there
are no major road or rail links between Myanmar and its neighbors China, India, and Thailand.
In 2010, the military again won elections that were clearly rigged. Almost no one expected any changes, but the new president,
Thein Sein, was to defy expectations. The government released hundreds of political prisoners, removed restrictions on the press,
freed Aung San Suu Kyi, and allowed opposition parties to contest seats in a series of by-elections. When Aung San Suu Kyi won a
by-election, thrashing her military-backed opponent, they let her take the seat, raising hopes that Myanmar was at last joining the
modern world. In response, both America and the European Union began to lift their sanctions.
Thein Sein also started to initiate much-needed economic reforms. Even before the 2010 elections, the military had begun to
quietly privatize state-owned enterprises, although many were placed in the hands of cronies of the regime. In 2012, Thein Sein
stated that the government would continue to reduce its role in a wide range of sectors, including energy, forestry, health care,
finance, and telecommunications. Land reforms are also under way. The government also abandoned the official fixed exchange
rate for the Myanmar currency, the kyat, replacing it with a managed float. From 2001 to 2012, the official exchange rate for the
kyat varied between 5.75 and 6.70 per U.S. dollar, while the black-market rate was between 750 and 1,335 per LL.S. dollar. The
official fixed exchange rate had effectively priced Myanmar's exports out of the world market, although it did benefit the military
elite who were able to exchange their worthless kyat for valuable U.S. dollars on very favorable terms. Implemented in April 2012,
the managed float valued the kyat at 818 per U.S. dollar. The dramatic fall in the value of the kyat is expected to
Page 613
stimulate demand for exports from Myanmar and help the economy grow.
To further encourage economic growth, the government signaled that it would welcome foreign direct investment and encouraged
foreign enterprises to enter into partnerships with domestic enterprises in its underdeveloped telecommunications sector General
Electric and IBM are among the companies stating that they may invest in the country. Between 2010 and 2014, Myanmar recorded
the largest increase in inward FDI of any country in Southeast Asia apart from the Philippines, although admittedly from a low
base.
In November 2015, general elections were held in Myanmar. These were the first free and fair elections in 25 years. The results
were stunning. The opposition party, the National League for Democracy, led by Anug San Suu Kyi, won 81 percent of the seats in
parliament, sweeping the military-backed government out of office. It now seems likely that Myanmar will finally emerge from its
isolation
Purchase answer to see full
attachment