Description
In an essay, please discuss the following topic:
Some academics argue that traditions and heritage should be public domain to protect them and ensure their continuity throughout the ages. Others argue that this umbrella provision is unfair and artists and authors who create derivative works inspired by heritage should get copyright protection, because this is a way of spreading awareness and is also a derivative work. Which position do you agree with? Why or why not?
1- thesis statmement 2- support possition by 3 strong argument , 3 paragraphs , 3- counclusion i would like to be on the side of uk law its a persuded essay i want a very easy words for high school level easy to read and to understand plz make sure no plaigarisim
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Hello, am through. Check it outIn case of any editing needed, kindly let me know
Running head: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
Intellectual Property Law
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor
Date
1
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
2
Introduction
It is identifiable that majority of the creative works are mainly derivatives from other
works. In academic work and research, it is common that some philosophies advocate that the
traditions and heritage should be from the main domains so as to facilitate effective
protection and to ensure continuity. However, my support holds that the umbrella division is
unfair and the artists who gain work from the derivatives should gain copyrights to ensure the
protection of intellectual property. Therefore, it is in order to say that the protection of the
derivatives using the intellectual property approach is r...