Description
Introduction (Objective): | Design a learning activity for your course where students demonstrate higher order thinking (analysis, synthesis, creation, etc.) according to Bloom's taxonomy. |
Description (Assignment): | As we discussed in Module 3 of OL 2050, there is more than one way for students to demonstrate what they know. We thought through some of these activities in Module 3, but in general terms. Now we are going to get more specific. More can be done with assessment in an online course than a multiple choice quiz. Just like in any other teaching situation, we want to help students think more deeply about the material and to do that, we need to think through activities that will get students to practice higher order thinking skills but that also make sense with learning objectives. Let’s describe an activity that you think would help students practice higher order thinking skills in an online course. This does not have to be something completely novel. You may have an idea for a writing assignment, but a writing assignment that asks students to approach a topic in a different way. But you might be thinking about using a different online technology like a blog, wiki, or even something like Twitter or a Google Hangout. Example: Jordan Peterson of University of Toronto found a way to increase student achievement and well-being by reflecting on the past and articulating their goals. “Students reflect on important moments in their past, identify key personal motivations and create plans for the future, including specific goals and strategies to overcome obstacles” (Kamenetz, 2015). In this way, writing exercises not just the cognitive abilities of students, but touches on their affective domain as well. Students learn about themselves as they learn about the course content.
Overall length of submitted work should be 300-400 words.
|
Rubric
Higher Order Thinking Activity Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe learning objective(s) of the activity are clearly articulated. |
| 4.0 pts | |||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe process of the activity is explained including any materials or resources that might be needed. |
| 4.0 pts | |||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgues why this activity will challenge students to use higher order thinking skills. |
| 4.0 pts | |||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplains how students will demonstrate measurable learning outcomes. |
| 4.0 pts | |||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall length of submitted work is 300-400 words. |
| 2.0 pts | |||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRules of grammar, usage, spelling and punctuation are followed. |
| 2.0 pts | |||
Total Points: 20.0 |
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Running head: HIGHER ORDER THINKING
Higher Order Thinking
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
1
HIGHER ORDER THINKING
2
Higher Order Thinking
Learning Objectives
The activity’s objective is to enable the learner to develop cognitive skills that are required
in identifying at least one system within the environment he/she is working in. The learner will
develop analytical skills that are applicable to working with complex and connected tasks
especially in an urban environment, where everything is connected to every other thing. The
activity should also enable students to deve...