Name:
Date:
Module Assignment: Ch. 1 & 3
Total points=50
Course Objectives:
•
•
•
•
•
Describe the structure and functions of the American legal system.
Explain how law is developed through statutes, court cases, and executive and
administrative agencies.
Identify the key elements in the civil litigation process and the major alternatives:
mediation and arbitration.
Explain the structure of the court system.
Define and describe legal terms and concepts that relate to Business Law.
Complete the following assignment. Write in complete sentences and with a
professional tone. Be sure to check your spelling and grammar.
Part 1: (20 points - 1 point for the definition and 1 point for each sentence = Select 10
terms @ 2 points each) Read and understand the economic/business definition of
each of the words listed below.
Select 10 words from the list below. For each of the 10 you selected Define the word
and then write one personal sentence to demonstrate your understanding by
accurately using the word in the sentence.
1. Business law
2. Constitutional law
3. Statutory law
4. Case law
5. Precedent
6. Stare decisis
7. Trial court
8. Appellate court
9. Voir dire
10. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
11. Negotiation
12. Mediation
13. Arbitration
14. Binding arbitration clause
Part 2.
Select and fully respond to 3 questions from the list below. To earn full credit be sure to
fully address each of the 3 selected questions, write in complete sentences and each
response should be at least 3 sentences.
1
1. Describe the structure and functions of the American legal system.
2. Explain how law is developed through statutes, court cases, and executive and
administrative agencies.
3. Identify the key elements in the civil litigation process and the major alternatives:
mediation and arbitration.
4. Explain the structure of the court system.
5. Describe the purposes and functions of business law.
6. Explain the sources of laws.
7. Describe the steps in civil ligation.
8. Explain the structure of the court system.
9. Define and describe how the various forms of alternative dispute resolution are
used by business today.
2
Chapter 1
An Introduction to the
Fundamentals of Dynamic
Business Law
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.
1
Chapter 1 Case Hypothetical
A group of attorneys, judges and law professionals have collaborated to
write a uniform criminal code. The code would create uniformity in
criminal law across the United States, defining what constitutes a
misdemeanor, what constitutes a felony, how crimes are defined, and
what the punishment for particular crimes will be. The code also
proposes that the death penalty be abolished, and that the maximum
punishment for murder be life imprisonment.
Would you favor the adoption and implementation of such a code?
What advantages would result from a uniform criminal code? What
disadvantages would result? What is the likelihood that all states would
favor its adoption and implementation, as opposed to the traditional
practice of each state defining criminal law within its own jurisdiction?
(Reference: http://www.law.upenn.edu/fac/phrobins/intromodpencode.pdf)
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2
Business Law
Definition: Enforceable rules of
conduct that govern commercial
relationships
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
3
Functional Areas of Business
Affected By Business Law
•Corporate Management
•Production and Transportation
•Marketing
•Research and Development
•Accounting and Finance
•Human Resource Management
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
4
Purposes of the Law
•Providing order
•Serving as an alternative to altercation
•Facilitating a sense that change is
possible
•Encouraging social justice
•Guaranteeing personal freedoms
•Serving as a moral guide
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
5
Classification of Law
• Private Law: Involves
disputes between
private individuals or
groups
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Public Law: Involves
disputes between
private individuals or
groups and their
government
6
Classification of Law
• Civil Law: Involves
the rights and
responsibilities
involved in
relationships between
persons and between
persons and their
government
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Criminal Law:
Involves incidents in
which someone
commits an act
against the public as
a whole
7
Sources of Business Law
•Constitutions
•Statutes
•Cases
•Administrative Law
•Treaties
•Executive Orders
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8
Major Federal Administrative
Agencies (Independent)
•Commodity Futures Trading Commission
•Consumer Product Safety Commission
•Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
•Federal Trade Commission
•Federal Communications Commission
•Interstate Commerce Commission
•National Labor Relations Board
•National Transportation Safety Board
•Nuclear Regulatory Commission
•Securities and Exchange Commission
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
9
Major Federal Administrative Agencies
(Executive)
•Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
•Occupational Safety and Health Administration
•General Services Administration
•National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•Small Business Administration
•International Development Cooperative Agency
•National Science Foundation
•Veterans Administration
•Office of Personnel Management
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
10
Schools of Legal Interpretation
•Natural Law
•Legal Positivism
•Identification with the Vulnerable
•Historical School: Tradition
•Legal Realism
•Cost-Benefit Analysis
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
11
Chapter 3
The U.S. Legal System and
Alternative Dispute Resolution
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.
1
Chapter 3 Case Hypothetical
John Wilson, owner of Wilson Construction Company, and Andrew Carrigan, owner
of Carrigan Brick and Masonry, Inc., are at odds regarding a construction contract
between the two companies. Wilson claims that Carrigan breached the contract
due to non-performance of certain masonry work; Carrigan defends on the basis
that Wilson did not permit him adequate access to the work site in order to complete
the work by the designated contract deadline. Wilson claims liquidated damages as
a result of the breach; the contract stipulates that upon breach, the non-breaching
party is entitled to $1,000 in damages for every day the work is not performed
beyond the contract deadline.
Wilson is considering mediation or arbitration as an alternative to civil litigation, but
he is concerned that “justice may not be served” if he submits to a method of
alternative dispute resolution. Are his concerns justified? Is justice better
guaranteed if Wilson and Carrigan litigate their case? Is mediation or arbitration
actually preferable to civil litigation? Regardless of what disputing parties prefer,
should court systems require that plaintiffs and defendants submit to arbitration or
meditation before being entitled to their “day in court?”
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2
Chapter 3 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma
Ted Henry, trial court administrator of the Ticonderoga County, New York court system, has grown tired of all of the
relatively trivial cases plaguing his county’s court dockets. In Ted’s opinion, everyone wants to exercise their “uniquely
American” right to sue these days, even when the amount in controversy is comparatively trivial; in Ticonderoga
County, for example, the number of cases valued at less than $10,000 has doubled in the past ten (10) years. Ted
blames the increase in “low-value” litigation on our litigious culture. He firmly believes that after having watched an
overabundance of legal melodramas on television, every American either wants to be a lawyer, or get a lawyer.
As a trial court administrator, Ted has been especially affected by the increase in litigation. Ticonderoga County’s
financial resources are limited, especially during difficult economic times. For Ted, it has become increasingly
challenging for him to manage the trial court docket each week with only a limited number of judges, bailiffs, trial
transcriptionists, and other key court personnel available. Ted knows that when it comes to the courtroom, time is
definitely money, and local taxpayers have not exactly “warmed up” to the idea of hiring more judges and other court
personnel to respond to the onslaught of increased litigation.
Ted has what he believes to be a “modest proposal.” In Ticonderoga County, he would like to implement binding
arbitration for each case involving an amount in controversy of less than $10,000 (In binding arbitration, the arbitrator’s
decision is final and non-appealable). As part of his proposal, the parties involved in the litigation (plaintiff and
defendant) would pay for the expenses of arbitration, and select the arbitrator. In law school, Ted’s first-year torts
professor had told his class that there was no guarantee of justice in the courtroom, and based on his experience, Ted
believed that his professor had been correct in that assessment; after all, there were too many contingencies and
variables in the courtroom to guarantee justice, including the effectiveness of legal counsel, the proclivities of the judge
presiding over the case, and the makeup of the jury. In Ted’s view, who is to say that justice would not be better
served in a case if a neutral, experienced arbitrator was involved in the dispute resolution, as opposed to a judge and
jury in a traditional courtroom? Ted is excited about his proposal, since (if implemented) it would reduce dramatically
the number of cases processed through the regular Ticonderoga County judicial system, thereby saving the taxpayers
money, and Ted’s sanity!
Is Ted Henry’s proposal, for binding arbitration in all civil cases involving less than $10,000 in controversy, legal? Is it
ethical?
3
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 3 Case Hypothetical
Defendant Woodson is an African-American male accused of murdering a white female in
an apartment burglary. During the jury selection process, Prosecutor Forbes exercises
only two peremptory challenges, excusing from service the only two African-Americans
sitting in the jury. An all-white jury is eventually empanelled, and Defendant Woodson is
convicted of first-degree murder, with life imprisonment imposed as punishment.
After the jury verdict is announced, Prosecutor Forbes is questioned by the local media
concerning his exercise of the peremptory challenges. Prosecutor Forbes explains that
race was not a factor in his decision, but that the two potential jurors were excused
“because they have facial hair, and as a matter of practice, I do not want individuals with
facial hair serving on my jury.” Further, Prosecutor Forbes states “I categorically deny
that race played any factor whatsoever in the jury selection process.”
On appeal, should the appellate court: 1) deem Prosecutor Forbes’ actions reversible
error, and remand the case to the trial court level to be retried; 2) vacate (nullify) the jury
verdict, and dismiss the charges against Defendant Woodson; or 3) allow the conviction
to stand? Should prosecutors be allowed to consider race as a factor in the jury selection
process? Gender? Age?
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
4
Chapter 3 Case Hypothetical
Officer Brian Perkins was having a difficult Monday morning. For the past three hours, he was responsible for “serving
process” in three (3) civil cases (As Chapter 3 indicates, service of process is the procedure by which courts present
litigation documents to defendants. Those documents typically consist of a complaint, which specifies the factual and
legal basis for the lawsuit and the relief the plaintiff seeks, and a summons, a court order that notifies the defendant of
the lawsuit and explains how and when to respond to the complaint). For the first civil case, Merriwether v. Alstott,
Officer Perkins attempted to serve the defendant Harry Alstott at his home, but no one appeared to be there. For the
second civil case, Setliff v. Sanders, the person answering the door claimed the defendant, Marshall Sanders, did not
live there, and that he did not even know who Marshall Sanders was. Leaving the premises, Officer Perkins surmised
that the residential address indicated on the summons was incorrect. Either that, or the person who answered the door
was lying.
For his third attempt at service of process that morning, in a lawsuit captioned Jackson v. Graves, Officer Perkins drove
to the home of Laticia M. Graves at 721 Magnolia Street. Officer Perkins knocked on the door of the dilapidated house,
and although no one answered the door, a second-story window opened almost immediately. A female in the house
looked down from her second story vantage point and pointedly asked Officer Perkins, “What do you want?” Officer
Perkins responded with a question, “Are you Laticia Graves,” to which the woman responded, “Yeah. What’s it to you?”
Officer Perkins asked the not-so-polite occupant to open the door, to which she responded, “I ain’t comin’ down there,
and if you ain’t got a warrant, you ain’t comin’ in.” Frustrated, Officer Perkins replied, “Well, I have civil papers to serve
you, ma’am, and if you won’t come down to get them, I’m going to put them in your mailbox.” The response was, “I
ain’t comin’ to the door.”
Officer Perkins immediately proceeded to the mailbox, and put the complaint and summons in the matter of Jackson v.
Graves in the box. The address on the mailbox indicated 721 Magnolia Street. In his notes, Officer Graves wrote that
the defendant, Laticia Graves, had been served with process on Monday, September 13, 2010 at 11:47 a.m. As he
entered his patrol car, Officer Perkins looked backed at the second-story window from which he had received his
impolite greeting. The woman had since closed the window, and was watching his every move.
Did Officer Perkins effectively serve process on the defendant, Laticia Graves? Why or why not?
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
5
Types of Jurisdiction
• Original Jurisdiction:
The power to hear
and decide cases
when they first enter
the legal system
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Appellate Jurisdiction:
The power to review
previous judicial
decisions to
determine whether
trial courts erred in
their decisions
6
Types of Jurisdiction
• In personam
jurisdiction: The
power to render a
decision affecting the
rights of the specific
persons before the
court
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
• Subject-matter
jurisdiction: The
power to hear certain
kinds of cases
7
Subject-Matter Jurisdiction:
Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction
•Admiralty cases
•Bankruptcy cases
•Federal criminal prosecutions
•Cases in which one state sues another state
•Claims against the United States
•Other claims involving federal statutes that
specify exclusive federal jurisdiction
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8
Subject-Matter Jurisdiction:
State Jurisdiction
•All cases not falling under
Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
9
Subject-Matter Jurisdiction:
Concurrent Federal and State
Jurisdiction
•Federal question cases
•Diversity of citizenship cases
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
10
The Federal Court System
•The United States Supreme
Court
•Intermediate Courts of Appeal
•Federal Trial Courts (U.S. District
Courts)
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
11
State Court Systems
•State Supreme Courts
•Intermediate Courts of Appeal
•State Trial Courts
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
12
Threshold Requirements for Litigation
•Standing (to sue)
-Actual/imminent injury in fact
-Injury traceable to actions of defendant
-Injury redressed by favorable decision
•Case or Controversy (Justifiable Controversy)
-Adverse relationship between plaintiff and
defendant
-Actions of one party give rise to legal dispute
-Court decision able to resolve dispute
•Ripeness
-Decision able to affect parties immediately
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
13
Steps in Civil Litigation:
The Pretrial Stage
•Informal Negotiations
•Pleadings
•Service of Process
•Defendant’s Response
•Pretrial Motions
•Discovery
•Pretrial Conference
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
14
Steps in Civil Litigation:
The Trial
•Jury Selection
•Opening Statements
•Examination of Witnesses and
Presentation of Evidence
•Closing Arguments
•Jury Instructions
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
15
Steps in Civil Litigation:
Post-Trial Motions
•Motion For Judgment In
Accordance With Verdict
•Motion For Judgment
Notwithstanding Verdict
•Motion For New Trial
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
16
Steps in Civil Litigation:
Appellate Procedure
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
17
Appellate Court Decision-Making
Powers
•Affirmation
•Modification
•Reversal
•Remand
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
18
Alternative Dispute Resolution
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
19
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Definition: The resolution of legal
disputes through methods other than
litigation, such as negotiation,
mediation, arbitration, summary jury
trials, mini-trials, neutral case
evaluations, and private trials
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
20
Reasons A Business Might Prefer Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) Versus Litigation
•ADR methods are generally faster and less
expensive than litigation
•Business may wish to avoid uncertainty
associated with a jury decision
•Business may wish to avoid setting precedent
through court decision
•Business may prefer confidential nature of ADR
•Compared to litigation, ADR might better allow
parties to preserve business relationship
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
21
Primary Forms of Alternative
Dispute Resolution
•Negotiation
•Mediation
•Arbitration
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
22
Advantages of Mediation
•Helps disputing parties preserve
their professional relationships
•Provides possibility of finding
creative solutions to dispute
•Offers participants high level of
autonomy
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
23
Disadvantages of Mediation
•Appears to be an equal process and
solution, thereby hiding power
imbalances that would lead to the party
with greater power securing an
agreement of greater benefit
•Some enter mediation with no
intention of finding a solution, and use
mediation as a delay tactic
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
24
Advantages of Arbitration
•More efficient and less expensive than
litigation
•Parties have more control over the process
of dispute resolution (parties choose the
arbitrator and determine how formal the
process will be)
•Parties can choose arbitrator with expertise
in specific subject matter of dispute
•Arbitrator has greater flexibility in decisionmaking (compared to decision-making
authority of judge)
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
25
Disadvantages of Arbitration
•As use of arbitration increases,
efficiencies and lower cost advantages
(compared to litigation) decrease
•Difficulty of appealing an arbitration
award
•Loss of civil rights and remedies available
through litigation
•Companies and employers may
effectively “hide” their disputes through
arbitration (non-public nature of arbitration
versus public trial)
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
26
Binding Arbitration Clause
Definition: A provision in a contract
mandating that all disputes arising
under a contract must be settled by
arbitration
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
27
Tips for Creating a Binding Arbitration
Clause
•Identify what you wish to arbitrate
•Make arbitration clause bilateral
•State which party will pay arbitrator’s fees
•Ensure arbitration is cost-effective
(compared to litigation)
•Specify how arbitrator selected
•Identify arbitration costs
•Avoid limitations on remedies
•Consider other parties when determining
where to hold arbitration
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
28
Other Alternative Dispute
Resolution Methods
•Mediation-Arbitration (“Med-Arb”)
•Summary Jury Trial
•Mini-Trial
•Early Neutral Case Evaluation
•Private Trials
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
29
Purchase answer to see full
attachment