Hi, if you could please answer the following DQ 1 and DQ 2 with 250-300 words each. Thank you DQ 1 :Identify three professional nursing organizations that interest you. Provide a brief summary of their purpose, requirements, and any differences in focus, population, scope, or intent. How do these organizations align to your goals and worldview?DQ 2:Research health care legislation that is being considered in your state. What impact might this legislation have on your future practice? What impact does it have on the collective practice of nurses in your state? How do you envision yourself potentially becoming involved in political advocacy for the profession in your future practice?Read Chapters 28-30 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.URL:https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/jones-and-bartlett/2016/advanced-practice-nursing_essential-knowledge-for-the-profession_3e.phpRead Chapters 10 and 11 in Leadership in Nursing Practice: Changing the Landscape of Health Care.URL:https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/jones-and-bartlett/2018/leadership-in-nursing-practice_changing-the-landscape-of-healthcare_3e.phpRead "A New Model for ANCC's Magnet Recognition Program," by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), located on U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs website.URL:https://www.nursingworld.org/organizational-programs/magnet/magnet-model/Explore the Professional Nursing Organizations links on the Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing website.URL:http://www.nursingsociety.org/connect-engage/our-global-impact/professional-nursing-organizations

Background Reminder: Writing Process StagesThroughout the class, we've emphasized that a writer has to keep audience in mind when choosing information and arranging it in a paper. This week you get a chance to get feedback from your peers, so you'll have a better sense of how another reader might view the ideas. Directions for Discussion Question Response2) Choose a draft a. State what you think the main point (thesis statement) of this essay is.b. State how convincing or unconvincing the evidence for the thesis is. Be specific here. For instance, you might indicate why some evidence is convincing while other information seems weak, giving the specific reason. c. Indicate where you feel the writer needs to add more information because the point being made is unclear or not very convincing yet.d. What is the most important thing the writer can do to make this paper better?After writing the rough draft i need to get full essay requirements are below : i will also attach an examples NOTE: Your Rough Draft should be a minimum of 1,200 words (not including the Works Cited page). Be sure to read "Revising Your Rough Draft" in Week 7 prior to revising for your final draft.The Rough Draft needs to be submitted by Sunday, 8/1, at 11:59pm. You should expect brief feedback from me by Wednesday, 8/4, at 11:59pm, BUT THIS ASSIGNMENT CANNOT BE SUBMITTED LATE!For the Researched Argument Essay, you are going to construct an audience-based argument that presents a claim about your topic and integrates the research you have done this semester to support your claim.Think carefully about your readers. Consider these five questions:What do you want readers to do or think?Why should they do or think that?How do they know that what you say is true?What should readers know about counterarguments?What larger principles or context grounds your argument?Also, think about the stakeholders involved in your topic. Who is most impacted? Most invested? Who can be the agents of change? Who is in the most powerful position to effect change? Note: stakeholders and agents of change are not always the same group of people. Writing an audience-based argument means thinking about your goals. What do you want the audience to do, think, or feel? What action do you think they need to take (if applicable)? In some cases, your audience may be large entities, such as corporations or governments, so you should set proportionate goals for your audience.Whatever your goal for your audience, you must choose and evaluate evidence accordingly. What evidence does the audience need? To what would they respond best? What most aligns with their own goals and agendas? Here, a careful consideration of ethos, pathos, and logos is critical. How are you going to appeal to your reader in a way that persuades them to proceed according to your recommendations?In other words, your thesis, evidence, purpose, and writing style should all correspond to your intended audience. You do not need to identify or address the audience explicitly, but you do need to write as if you were addressing that intended audience.What should it include?1) INTRODUCTION: Use an attention-grabbing introduction that gives an overview of the topic and speaks to the specific sentiments or concerns of the audience you have chosen whilst also indicating your position2) THESIS: Develop a clearly formulated, arguable thesis, including reasoning to support your position. In other words, your thesis should concisely give readers the reasons why your claim should be believed or why they should think/feel/act differently. 3) TOPIC SENTENCES: Each paragraph should begin with a clear and effective topic sentence that foregrounds for the reader what is discussed in the subsequent paragraph.4) EFFECTIVE PARAGRAPHS: The paper must include ordered, developed, cohesive, and coherent paragraphs that develop the argument by offering evidence and explanation in support of your position. Every sentence should contribute to the argument of its paragraph and the paper as a whole. Make sure, too, that the logical relationship between sentences is always clear and that body paragraphs identify supporting reasons, ideas, or examples for the claim.5) COUNTERARGUMENTS: The essay must present and then respond to one or more counterarguments to your claim.6) CONCLUSION: End with a conclusion that emphasizes the importance of taking the action or making the change recommended by the claim.7) ACADEMIC STYLE: The essay should follow coherent organization between and within paragraphs, maintain appropriate style and tone suited to the purpose and audience of the argument, adhere to proper, ethical, and correct documentation for ALL sources (sources that have been carefully evaluated, of course), and observe correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization throughout.Requirements for the Rough DraftMinimum of 5 sources, including 3 scholarly sources.Minimum 1,200 words Correct MLA formattingCorrect MLA in-text citationsCorrect MLA Works CitedRubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction & Thesis10 ptsAbove ExpectationsWell-developed introductory paragraph contains detailed background information and/or a clear, compelling explanation or definition of the problem, and an insightful, debatable thesis statement.7.5 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe introductory paragraph contains some background information, a general explanation or definition of the problem, and a debatable thesis statement.5 ptsBelow ExpectationsIntroduction contains little to no background information, and thesis and/or problem is vague or unclear. Details are a seemingly random collection of information, unclear, or not related to the topic.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of Ideas10 to >7.5 ptsAbove ExpectationsDevelopment is fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and compelling evidence in support of the main argument.7.5 to >5.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsDevelopment is adequate, but may lack depth, with details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence in support of the main argument.5 to >0 ptsBelow ExpectationsDevelopment is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that may include logical fallacies or unsupported claims.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization10 to >7.5 ptsAbove ExpectationsOrganization is coherent, unified and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/ plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.7.5 to >5.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsOrganization is coherent, unified and mostly effective in support of the paper’s purpose and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs.5 to >0 ptsBelow ExpectationsOrganization is confused and fragmented, failing to support the essay’s purpose, and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics & Style10 to >7.5 ptsAbove ExpectationsStyle is confident, readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, precise word choices, and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation.7.5 to >5.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsStyle is mostly readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating some varied sentence structure, effective word choices, and correct grammar, spelling and punctuation.5 to >0 ptsBelow ExpectationsStyle is incoherent or inappropriate in tone, including a lack of sentence variety, ineffective or inappropriate word choices, and serious errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMLA Formatting & Citations10 to >7.5 ptsAbove ExpectationsMLA formatting is correct, meets all assignment requirements, and works expertly to support the essay’s purpose. All sources are credible, and citations are correct and perfectly formatted, with the exception of 0-5 minor errors.7.5 to >5.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsMLA formatting is generally correct, meets most assignment requirements, and works well to support the essay’s purpose. Most sources are credible, and citations are correct and perfectly formatted, with the exception of 5-8 minor errors, and 1-2 major errors.5 to >0 ptsBelow ExpectationsMLA formatting is faulty, does not meet critical assignment requirements, and fails to support the essay’s purpose. Few sources are credible, and citations are incorrectly formatted, with more than 8 minor errors and 3 major errors.10 ptsTotal Points: 50PreviousNext