clinical scenario Assignment

Anonymous
timer Asked: Oct 3rd, 2018
account_balance_wallet $30

Question description

Questions

  1. The clinical scenario(ATTACHED) is most consistent with which acid base imbalance? You may simply list your answer below using a bullet point format. This does not have to be in a complete sentence.
  2. What data in the clinical scenario supports your diagnosis? Make sure to interpret the lab values you list below. You may simply list your answers below using a bullet point format. This does not have to be in a complete sentence.
  3. What is the cause of Ms. X’s acid base disorder? You may simply list your answer below using a bullet point format. This does not have to be in a complete sentence.
  1. Describe the key pathophysiologic concepts of the diagnosis in question 1. To answer this question completely, you must answer all of the sub-questions below using complete sentences. Each sub-question may be answered in 1-6 sentences.
    1. What is the chemical buffer system? What is the role of the buffer system in maintaining acid base homeostasis?
    2. How does the answer you identified in question 3, cause this acid base disorder?
    3. What effect does this acid base disorder have on calcium? Describe how this acid base disorder alters calcium homeostasis.
    4. What effect does this acid base disorder have on potassium? Describe how this acid base disorder alters potassium homeostasis.
  2. For what actual or potential complications related to the diagnosis in question 1 does she need to be monitored? You may simply list your answer(s) below using a bullet point format. This does not have to be in a complete sentence.


APA required intet citation required

RUBRIC

NoviceCompetentProficient
UTA Formatted Title Page

Points:0 (0%)

Does not provide a title page or has more than two errors on the title page.

Feedback:

Points:3.75 (3.75%)

Has no more than one two errors on the title page.

Feedback:

Points:5 (5%)

All criteria must be achieved: Follows the example posted in the Module 1 To Do List without any errors.

Feedback:

Question 1

Points:0 (0%)

Does not answer the question.

Feedback:

Points:7.5 (7.5%)

Provides a primary diagnosis but it is incorrect.

Feedback:

Points:10 (10%)

All criteria must be achieved: Identifies the primary diagnosis correctly. The answer may be listed using a bullet point format. A complete sentence is not required. A citation is not required.

Feedback:

Question 2

Points:0 (0%)

Does not answer the question. or Provides less than 50% of the historical, examination, or laboratory data which supports the primary diagnosis correctly.

Feedback:

Points:8.5 (8.5%)

Provides 50% or greater, (but not all, of the historical, examination, or laboratory data which supports the primary diagnosis correctly. Or provides any amount of extraneous historical, examination, or laboratory data which does not support the primary diagnosis.

Feedback:

Points:10 (10%)

All criteria must be achieved: Correctly identifies only that historical, examination and laboratory data which supports the primary diagnoses. Identifies all of the clinical data in the case which supports the primary diagnosis. Does not provide any extraneous data which does not apply to the primary diagnosis. The answers may be listed using a bullet point format. A complete sentence is not required. A citation is not required.

Feedback:

Question 3

Points:0 (0%)

Does not answer the question.

Feedback:

Points:7.5 (7.5%)

Answered the primary question and/or one or more of any additional questions (if more than one question is present) incorrectly.

Feedback:

Points:10 (10%)

All criteria must be achieved: Answered the question correctly. All questions (if more than one) are answered correctly. The answer(s) may be listed using a bullet point format. A complete sentence is not required. A citation is not required.

Feedback:

Question 4

Points:0 (0%)

Does not answer the question. Or Describes 50% or greater of the key concepts of the primary disease's pathogenesis incorrectly. Or Did not answer more than 50% of the questions. Or No complete sentences were used to answer any of the questions.

Feedback:

Points:34 (34%)

Describes 50% or greater of the key concepts of the primary disease's pathogenesis correctly but not all answers were correct. Or 50% of the questions were not answers. Or Complete sentences were used to answer some of the questions but not all of them.

Feedback:

Points:40 (40%)

All criteria must be achieved: Describes the key concepts of the primary disease's pathogenesis by correctly answering all questions. The questions may be answered using 1-6 complete sentences per each question. Citations are required for each answer to each question. Point deductions for missing citations will be applied in the APA/Organization/Grammar portion of the rubric.

Feedback:

Question 5

Points:0 (0%)

Does not answer the question or all answers given are incorrect.

Feedback:

Points:7.5 (7.5%)

Has only one correctly identified actual or potential complication.

Feedback:

Points:10 (10%)

All criteria must be achieved: Has two or more correctly identified actual or potential complications.

Feedback:

APA, Organization, Grammar

Points:0 (0%)

A reference list is not provided. or There are greater than 5 APA 6th edition errors. or There are greater than 5 grammatical errors or typos. or There are 3 or more questions that do not have an APA 6th edition citation. or No professional references were used. Or All references used were older than 6 years. or Uses 1 or more quoted sentences to answer any of the questions.

Feedback:

Points:12.75 (12.75%)

If McCance is referenced and the reference is not written as an edited book. Example is in the course overview video. Or There is 1-5 APA 6th edition errors. or There is 1-5 grammatical errors or typos. or 1-2 answers do not have an APA 6th edition citation. or One or more references are not from a professional source. or One or more reference is older than 6 years. or References one or more of the course lectures/power points/concept maps. or Poor Organization and difficult to follow.

Feedback:

Points:15 (15%)

All criteria must be achieved: A separate reference page is provided. All references are in APA format without any errors. No grammatical errors or typos are present. All questions in question 4 have an APA citation written correctly. Submission is well organized and easy to follow. APA formatting is consistent with the 6th edition APA manual. Only professional references are used: Peer reviewed journal articles or textbooks. References are not greater than 6 years old. Complete sentences are paraphrased and not quoted. Does not reference course lectures/power points or concept maps.

Feedback:

Name:Case Study Rubric 2017

clinical scenario  Assignment
1537952081088blob.jpg

Tutor Answer

henryprofessor
School: Duke University

At...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Excellent job

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors