Description
As you consider your interview, think about:
- Asking of questions to ask to encourage stories and examples
- How to “reframe” questions to reduce ambiguity and bias
- What you can do to make the interviewee at ease
- What you can do to build rapport and trust
For this Discussion, you will examine the characteristics of a good qualitative interview.
To prepare for this Discussion:
- Review the chapters of the Rubin and Rubin course text and consider the characteristics of a good qualitative interview.
- Review the Yob and Brewer interview questions in Appendix A at the end of the article and consider how interview guides are used in research.
- Review the Interview Guide Instructions and the Interview Guide Example found in this week’s Learning Resources and use these documents to guide you during your interview.
By Day 4
Post your explanation of the characteristics of a good qualitative interview. Also include what makes a good interview guide. Use the interview questions from Yob and Brewer’s interview guide to support your post.
Be sure to support your main post and response post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA style.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
7 pages
1analysis Of Wrongdoing
Analyze the situation from the perspective of the individual's social, cultural, and Ethics refer to set of principles tha ...
1analysis Of Wrongdoing
Analyze the situation from the perspective of the individual's social, cultural, and Ethics refer to set of principles that help to guide an ...
U.S. Foreign Policy, Ideals or Self-Interest, political science homework help
The late Robert Osgood, in his seminal work on U.S. foreign policy "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relation ...
U.S. Foreign Policy, Ideals or Self-Interest, political science homework help
The late Robert Osgood, in his seminal work on U.S. foreign policy "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relations," made a powerful argument for the realist approach to foreign policy, however he cautioned that idealism is also indispensable in making foreign policy. His book chronicles many examples. One such example mentions those who advocated a strict focus on U.S. self-interest prior to World War II and advocated America steering clear of war in Europe. In this war issue, idealists were alarmed by the fascist threat to Western society and wanted the U.S. to enter the war and defend the democracies of Europe--on whose survival our own United States security depended.Go to Course Documents for article, Relevant Today: The Insights of Dr. Robert Osgood, by Jonathan Tkachuk, Program Associate, The Osgood Center. DirectionsReview the article "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relations" by Robert Osgood (Course Documents)Determine your thesis as to whether United States foreign policy decisions should be based on ideals or self-interest. Write a one-page, double-spaced response to the question: United States foreign policy should be based on ideals or self-interest? Include in your answer a brief description of the cyclical nature of U. S. foreign policy, and taking into account the continuity principle as explained in your text.
ARTICLE BY : "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relations" by Robert Osgood Note from the President of the Osgood Center, Shelton Williams: Jonathan Tkachuk has served as a Program Associate at the Osgood Center
for four months. In these months, I have asked him to “find his own voice” as an analyst. Over five articles, he has done exactly that. It was his
idea to revisit Robert Osgood’s “Ideals and Self Interests” as a tribute to the scholar whose name graces our institution and as a way to find for
himself why I constantly argue Mr. Osgood’s relevance. I like Mr. Tkachuk’s article even as I disagree with his conclusion. I know Mr. Osgood
would embrace the article’s notion that all sides in the US foreign policy debate must be represented but I think his main argument would not
bemoan the absence of intellectual opposition to intervention but rather the inertia that prevents the US from reassessing its priorities and
recognizing its purpose: to support an international order that serves US interests over the long haul. Nevertheless, Tkachuk presents his case
and honors Mr. Osgood. I commend the article for your consideration.
Relevant Today: The Insights of Dr. Robert Osgood
By Jonathan Tkachuk
“An idealistic policy undisciplined by political realism is bound to be unstable and ineffective;
political realism unguided by moral purpose will be self-defeating and futile.”
-Robert Osgood, “Ideals and Self-Interest in America’s Foreign Relations,” p. 451
“The Reagan administration was always willing to talk to the Soviets... In 1988, Reagan spoke
eloquently about peace as well as freedom in a speech to students at Moscow State University.
No wonder Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine, earlier had denounced Reagan
for “appeasement by any other name.””
-Doug Bandow, “American Realist: Hefting a Big Stick and Using it Sparingly,” The American
Conservative, July 5th, 2004
“The party as a whole has helped to make Cain’s candidacy possible by lowering the bar for
knowledge about foreign policy and national security issues so much that he could bluff his way
through most of this year by saying that he would defer to experts. Aside from Huntsman and
Paul, the GOP field doesn’t have any members who could discuss foreign affairs for any
length of time without falling back on a lot of cliches and slogans, and much of what Romney
and Santorum think they know about foreign policy is simply wrong.”
-Daniel Larison, “Foreign Policy Ignorance and Foreign Policy Nonsense,” The American
Conservative-Eunomia, November 15th, 2011
In his seminal work on American foreign policy, Ideals and Self-Interest in America’s
Foreign Relations, Dr. Robert Osgood examines the critical relationship between America’s
distinct national narrative and its conduct of foreign policy from 1898-1950. While his insights
into the historical details of that relationship are exemplary, it is his broader argument that is
most noteworthy: that an American realist foreign policy must be mindful of the altruistic,
idealistic and moralistic features of America’s internal narrative in order to be successful. For
Osgood, this means that an American foreign policy based solely on either Realpolitik or self-
less Idealism will ultimately fail, both politically at home and in the securing of its legitimate
national interests abroad.
On the surface, Osgood’s acknowledgement of the legitimate, albeit limited, role idealism
plays in American foreign policy seems out of place within the realist tradition. Historically,
realist thinkers in foreign policy have understood the concept of a nation’s “interest” as being a
highly rational, calculable and objective concern of state. In other words, this means that the
“interests” of a state in its foreign relations are not influenced by altruistic motives. Indeed, one
can usually identify a realist simply upon their usage of the term “national interest.”
Yet, what places Osgood’s argument firmly in the realist tradition is its preoccupation
with “the possible,” as opposed to the “ought.” of American foreign relations. While Osgood
acknowledges the legitimate role idealism has in shaping American foreign relation, he does so
only to the extent that a failure to cede a public role for American idealism would cripple the
work of American foreign policy entirely. He identifies two ways this crippling would manifest
itself: 1) through the eventual loss of public support at home for that policy or 2) through the
failure to support an international order that is more conducive to securing and advancing her
legitimate national interests. While contemporary realists may take issue with the latter, one
suspects that disagreement would be one of degree, not substance.
Unfortunately for the American people, it is unlikely that the insights of Dr. Osgood will
be taken into consideration at this time. The reasons for this are numerous; ranging from the state
of our collective education, entertainment, attitude of mind, civic commitment, concept of
justice, concept of the “good,” common culture and politics to the ultimate quality of our leaders,
political and otherwise.
In addition to these, and recognizable to Dr. Osgood, would also be the extent to which
America’s internal narrative has been employed in the furtherance of its foreign policy over the
last twenty years. Osgood would have recognized our interventions in places such as Somalia,
Haiti, the former Yugoslavia and Libya as having relied heavily upon the same humanitarian
sentiments of American idealism that galvanized America into the Spanish-American War. Our
more ambitious interventions in Iraq (beginning in 2003) and Afghanistan (2001-present) would
have been recognized as having relied upon the more liberal sentiments of American idealism
that undergird American support for both World Wars.
Yet, there is a singular quality of our public narrative that I believe Dr. Osgood, were he
still with us today, would not recognize. This element is the almost complete lack of a
widespread antagonism to foreign intervention. During the 20th century, such an antagonism was
either well-represented by an entire political party (usually the Republican Party) or by the
outside party who benefitted from the foreign policy belligerence of the presidential incumbent
(Eisenhower in 1952, Johnson in 1964, Democrats in 2006 midterms and in the Obama landslide
in 2008).
Other than for a small but energetic “Ron Paul faction” of the Republican Party, a faction
seeking to bring the party towards a foreign policy historically championed by Senator Robert
Taft, the present Republican Party is the party of interventionism, par excellent.
The Democratic Party, for all the realists that fill their ranks, has nevertheless been a
complicit accomplice to the pattern of post-Cold War interventionism.
This is unfortunate, for it suggests an America not content with itself, as itself, by itself,
for itself and its posterity. It suggests an American political culture that, both on the right and on
the left, is more comfortable projecting its idealism abroad to heal the blights of nations than it is
in perfecting our Union at home. It suggests that while we believe ourselves to be uniquely
endowed, particularly in the moral sense, we now perceive this quality being contingent upon our
acting to combat the various travails that plague humanity.
In other words our foreign policy, and not our “way of life,” has become the means by
which we gain our collective sense of identity and moral purpose. It is through armed
intervention that our nation finds the highest expression of its civic and cultural values. We recoil
at the thought of being a “shining city on a hill,” not for fear of wait lays at the bottom of the hill,
but of what may lay within the city.
I believe this state of affairs would baffle Dr. Osgood. Rather than growing mature while
remaining young, America has grown insecure; both with herself as well as her position in the
world.
Miami Dade College Feminist Ethics by Alison Jagger Article Summary
Write a short, objective summary of 250-500 words which summarizes the main ideas being put forward by the author in this ...
Miami Dade College Feminist Ethics by Alison Jagger Article Summary
Write a short, objective summary of 250-500 words which summarizes the main ideas being put forward by the author in this selection. I will attach the reading.REQUIREMENTS ARE PASTED BELOWAssignments which do not meet these requirements will be graded accordingly:Reading Summaries should be a minimum of 250 words and a maximum of 500 words (approximately 1-2 pages in standard formatting)All reading summaries must follow standard formatting requirements. (That is, standard margins, font size, and paragraph spacing is observed. Students cannot manipulate font size, margins, and paragraph spacing to meet length requirements.)Reading Summaries require that you read a primary source selection from the end of each chapter, then write a short summary that identifies the thesis and outlines the main argument. Reading summaries are not about your opinion or perspective – they are expository essays that explain the content of the reading. All reading summaries must include substantive content based on the students reading of the material.When writing Reading Summaries, you may not quote the author without proper citations. In other words, if you use the exact words of the original author (copy-paste) you MUST do a proper citation. Similarly, if you use any other website (such as Wikipedia, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, etc.) you must cite the source. Failure to cite sources properly is in violation of Student Rights and Responsibilities Manual which may result in grade penalties. When in doubt, quote/cite your sources. All quotes, references, and ideas lifted from any source – including internet sources MUST be properly cited in MLA/APA format.All reading summaries must be thoroughly proof-read and checked for spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Students should write in professional, academic prose and use only appropriate language. Spelling and grammar count towards your grade in every assignment.
assignment
Q1 Read the case study of “Jack” located in the Topic 4 materials and provide the appropriate DSM-5 diagnoses in desce ...
assignment
Q1 Read the case study of “Jack” located in the Topic 4 materials and provide the appropriate DSM-5 diagnoses in descending order, from the dominant, to the least dominant. For each diagnosis you assign, provide an explanation of the diagnostic criteria you assessed to be compelling, as found in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria monograph for each disorder.Q2 Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Comparison ChartDirections: Although bipolar and depressive disorders share several key similarities, some aspects are radically different among these disorders. The completion of this chart gives you an opportunity to thoroughly compare and contrast these specific disorders. Complete the table below by following the example provided for Cyclothymic Disorder. Include examples and at least two scholarly references as reference notes below the chart. Note: “D/O” is an acronym for disorderDisorder & FeaturesDepressive Episode?Manic Episode?Hypomanic Episode?Duration of Clinically-Significant SymptomsDuration of Symptom-Free IntervalsDistinguish From (Differential Diagnosis):Comorbidity (Often Seen With):Cyclothymic Disorder No, butepisodes only that do not meet full criteriaNoNo, butepisodes only that do not meet full criteria2+ yr. in Adults1+ yr. in AdolescentsNo longer than 2 monthsPsychotic D/OBipolar D/OBorderline PDSubstance-Induced D/OSubstance-Related D/OSleep D/OADHDMDD Major Depressive Disorder Dysthymia Persistent Depressive DisorderDMDD Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder Bipolar I Disorder Bipolar II Disorder References:
ethos essay
Write an argumentative essay of about 800 words ,Ethos means the credibility of the person making the argument—or in oth ...
ethos essay
Write an argumentative essay of about 800 words ,Ethos means the credibility of the person making the argument—or in other words, persuading with a person's good reputation or trustworthiness. If someone has good ethos, it means that we respect them and we will be more willing to believe what they say.In many arguments, the best kind of ethos comes from an expert. For example, if you wanted to get advice about what medicine to take for a bad cold, you would probably trust a doctor more than your next-door neighbor. Why? Because the doctor has better ethos. You respect a doctor's medical opinion more than some random neighbor.So argue anything you want (with an ethical focus), using credible sources (credible in the field that you're arguing).
Similar Content
Glendale Community College Apollo Orchestra Classical Concert Analysis
Here is the link to the concert: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SW_Rhjjgy8Performance setting: Give the date, place, an...
Saint Marys University Social Psychological Studies Discussion
Brief Written AssignmentThis brief video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSsPfbup0ac depicts scenarios that are similar to...
UC Wk 3 Market Segmentation Target Demographic of Customers Discussion Questions
questions:
Say you've got a friend who is an entrepreneur. She’s making the best software, wine, or whatever...
Berkeley College Climate Change in Brazil Essay
There will be no questions as such; you write on an aspect of the issue climate change in Brazil. Around 900-950 words.Ple...
COMSC 3253 Solid State Forensics Discussion
After reading chapter 5, reviewing the PowerPoint slides, and watching the videos (and other readings if present) discuss ...
University Of California Santa Barbara Films Analysis Essay
General Instructions
In Part 1 below: write essays for each of the prompts
In Part 2 below: respond to 3 of the promp...
History - History of the periodic table of chemical elements
The Periodic Table is an arrangement of the chemical elements arranged in order of atomic number, usually in rows, so that...
Self Assesment
I gave myself this score because I believe that I was able to properly flesh out my idea and connect all of my sub points ...
Andrew Jackson 1
The type of car that I would imagine Andrew Jackson driving while cruising the Coast during the campaign period would be a...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
7 pages
1analysis Of Wrongdoing
Analyze the situation from the perspective of the individual's social, cultural, and Ethics refer to set of principles tha ...
1analysis Of Wrongdoing
Analyze the situation from the perspective of the individual's social, cultural, and Ethics refer to set of principles that help to guide an ...
U.S. Foreign Policy, Ideals or Self-Interest, political science homework help
The late Robert Osgood, in his seminal work on U.S. foreign policy "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relation ...
U.S. Foreign Policy, Ideals or Self-Interest, political science homework help
The late Robert Osgood, in his seminal work on U.S. foreign policy "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relations," made a powerful argument for the realist approach to foreign policy, however he cautioned that idealism is also indispensable in making foreign policy. His book chronicles many examples. One such example mentions those who advocated a strict focus on U.S. self-interest prior to World War II and advocated America steering clear of war in Europe. In this war issue, idealists were alarmed by the fascist threat to Western society and wanted the U.S. to enter the war and defend the democracies of Europe--on whose survival our own United States security depended.Go to Course Documents for article, Relevant Today: The Insights of Dr. Robert Osgood, by Jonathan Tkachuk, Program Associate, The Osgood Center. DirectionsReview the article "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relations" by Robert Osgood (Course Documents)Determine your thesis as to whether United States foreign policy decisions should be based on ideals or self-interest. Write a one-page, double-spaced response to the question: United States foreign policy should be based on ideals or self-interest? Include in your answer a brief description of the cyclical nature of U. S. foreign policy, and taking into account the continuity principle as explained in your text.
ARTICLE BY : "Ideals and Self-Interest in America's Foreign Relations" by Robert Osgood Note from the President of the Osgood Center, Shelton Williams: Jonathan Tkachuk has served as a Program Associate at the Osgood Center
for four months. In these months, I have asked him to “find his own voice” as an analyst. Over five articles, he has done exactly that. It was his
idea to revisit Robert Osgood’s “Ideals and Self Interests” as a tribute to the scholar whose name graces our institution and as a way to find for
himself why I constantly argue Mr. Osgood’s relevance. I like Mr. Tkachuk’s article even as I disagree with his conclusion. I know Mr. Osgood
would embrace the article’s notion that all sides in the US foreign policy debate must be represented but I think his main argument would not
bemoan the absence of intellectual opposition to intervention but rather the inertia that prevents the US from reassessing its priorities and
recognizing its purpose: to support an international order that serves US interests over the long haul. Nevertheless, Tkachuk presents his case
and honors Mr. Osgood. I commend the article for your consideration.
Relevant Today: The Insights of Dr. Robert Osgood
By Jonathan Tkachuk
“An idealistic policy undisciplined by political realism is bound to be unstable and ineffective;
political realism unguided by moral purpose will be self-defeating and futile.”
-Robert Osgood, “Ideals and Self-Interest in America’s Foreign Relations,” p. 451
“The Reagan administration was always willing to talk to the Soviets... In 1988, Reagan spoke
eloquently about peace as well as freedom in a speech to students at Moscow State University.
No wonder Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine, earlier had denounced Reagan
for “appeasement by any other name.””
-Doug Bandow, “American Realist: Hefting a Big Stick and Using it Sparingly,” The American
Conservative, July 5th, 2004
“The party as a whole has helped to make Cain’s candidacy possible by lowering the bar for
knowledge about foreign policy and national security issues so much that he could bluff his way
through most of this year by saying that he would defer to experts. Aside from Huntsman and
Paul, the GOP field doesn’t have any members who could discuss foreign affairs for any
length of time without falling back on a lot of cliches and slogans, and much of what Romney
and Santorum think they know about foreign policy is simply wrong.”
-Daniel Larison, “Foreign Policy Ignorance and Foreign Policy Nonsense,” The American
Conservative-Eunomia, November 15th, 2011
In his seminal work on American foreign policy, Ideals and Self-Interest in America’s
Foreign Relations, Dr. Robert Osgood examines the critical relationship between America’s
distinct national narrative and its conduct of foreign policy from 1898-1950. While his insights
into the historical details of that relationship are exemplary, it is his broader argument that is
most noteworthy: that an American realist foreign policy must be mindful of the altruistic,
idealistic and moralistic features of America’s internal narrative in order to be successful. For
Osgood, this means that an American foreign policy based solely on either Realpolitik or self-
less Idealism will ultimately fail, both politically at home and in the securing of its legitimate
national interests abroad.
On the surface, Osgood’s acknowledgement of the legitimate, albeit limited, role idealism
plays in American foreign policy seems out of place within the realist tradition. Historically,
realist thinkers in foreign policy have understood the concept of a nation’s “interest” as being a
highly rational, calculable and objective concern of state. In other words, this means that the
“interests” of a state in its foreign relations are not influenced by altruistic motives. Indeed, one
can usually identify a realist simply upon their usage of the term “national interest.”
Yet, what places Osgood’s argument firmly in the realist tradition is its preoccupation
with “the possible,” as opposed to the “ought.” of American foreign relations. While Osgood
acknowledges the legitimate role idealism has in shaping American foreign relation, he does so
only to the extent that a failure to cede a public role for American idealism would cripple the
work of American foreign policy entirely. He identifies two ways this crippling would manifest
itself: 1) through the eventual loss of public support at home for that policy or 2) through the
failure to support an international order that is more conducive to securing and advancing her
legitimate national interests. While contemporary realists may take issue with the latter, one
suspects that disagreement would be one of degree, not substance.
Unfortunately for the American people, it is unlikely that the insights of Dr. Osgood will
be taken into consideration at this time. The reasons for this are numerous; ranging from the state
of our collective education, entertainment, attitude of mind, civic commitment, concept of
justice, concept of the “good,” common culture and politics to the ultimate quality of our leaders,
political and otherwise.
In addition to these, and recognizable to Dr. Osgood, would also be the extent to which
America’s internal narrative has been employed in the furtherance of its foreign policy over the
last twenty years. Osgood would have recognized our interventions in places such as Somalia,
Haiti, the former Yugoslavia and Libya as having relied heavily upon the same humanitarian
sentiments of American idealism that galvanized America into the Spanish-American War. Our
more ambitious interventions in Iraq (beginning in 2003) and Afghanistan (2001-present) would
have been recognized as having relied upon the more liberal sentiments of American idealism
that undergird American support for both World Wars.
Yet, there is a singular quality of our public narrative that I believe Dr. Osgood, were he
still with us today, would not recognize. This element is the almost complete lack of a
widespread antagonism to foreign intervention. During the 20th century, such an antagonism was
either well-represented by an entire political party (usually the Republican Party) or by the
outside party who benefitted from the foreign policy belligerence of the presidential incumbent
(Eisenhower in 1952, Johnson in 1964, Democrats in 2006 midterms and in the Obama landslide
in 2008).
Other than for a small but energetic “Ron Paul faction” of the Republican Party, a faction
seeking to bring the party towards a foreign policy historically championed by Senator Robert
Taft, the present Republican Party is the party of interventionism, par excellent.
The Democratic Party, for all the realists that fill their ranks, has nevertheless been a
complicit accomplice to the pattern of post-Cold War interventionism.
This is unfortunate, for it suggests an America not content with itself, as itself, by itself,
for itself and its posterity. It suggests an American political culture that, both on the right and on
the left, is more comfortable projecting its idealism abroad to heal the blights of nations than it is
in perfecting our Union at home. It suggests that while we believe ourselves to be uniquely
endowed, particularly in the moral sense, we now perceive this quality being contingent upon our
acting to combat the various travails that plague humanity.
In other words our foreign policy, and not our “way of life,” has become the means by
which we gain our collective sense of identity and moral purpose. It is through armed
intervention that our nation finds the highest expression of its civic and cultural values. We recoil
at the thought of being a “shining city on a hill,” not for fear of wait lays at the bottom of the hill,
but of what may lay within the city.
I believe this state of affairs would baffle Dr. Osgood. Rather than growing mature while
remaining young, America has grown insecure; both with herself as well as her position in the
world.
Miami Dade College Feminist Ethics by Alison Jagger Article Summary
Write a short, objective summary of 250-500 words which summarizes the main ideas being put forward by the author in this ...
Miami Dade College Feminist Ethics by Alison Jagger Article Summary
Write a short, objective summary of 250-500 words which summarizes the main ideas being put forward by the author in this selection. I will attach the reading.REQUIREMENTS ARE PASTED BELOWAssignments which do not meet these requirements will be graded accordingly:Reading Summaries should be a minimum of 250 words and a maximum of 500 words (approximately 1-2 pages in standard formatting)All reading summaries must follow standard formatting requirements. (That is, standard margins, font size, and paragraph spacing is observed. Students cannot manipulate font size, margins, and paragraph spacing to meet length requirements.)Reading Summaries require that you read a primary source selection from the end of each chapter, then write a short summary that identifies the thesis and outlines the main argument. Reading summaries are not about your opinion or perspective – they are expository essays that explain the content of the reading. All reading summaries must include substantive content based on the students reading of the material.When writing Reading Summaries, you may not quote the author without proper citations. In other words, if you use the exact words of the original author (copy-paste) you MUST do a proper citation. Similarly, if you use any other website (such as Wikipedia, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, etc.) you must cite the source. Failure to cite sources properly is in violation of Student Rights and Responsibilities Manual which may result in grade penalties. When in doubt, quote/cite your sources. All quotes, references, and ideas lifted from any source – including internet sources MUST be properly cited in MLA/APA format.All reading summaries must be thoroughly proof-read and checked for spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Students should write in professional, academic prose and use only appropriate language. Spelling and grammar count towards your grade in every assignment.
assignment
Q1 Read the case study of “Jack” located in the Topic 4 materials and provide the appropriate DSM-5 diagnoses in desce ...
assignment
Q1 Read the case study of “Jack” located in the Topic 4 materials and provide the appropriate DSM-5 diagnoses in descending order, from the dominant, to the least dominant. For each diagnosis you assign, provide an explanation of the diagnostic criteria you assessed to be compelling, as found in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria monograph for each disorder.Q2 Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Comparison ChartDirections: Although bipolar and depressive disorders share several key similarities, some aspects are radically different among these disorders. The completion of this chart gives you an opportunity to thoroughly compare and contrast these specific disorders. Complete the table below by following the example provided for Cyclothymic Disorder. Include examples and at least two scholarly references as reference notes below the chart. Note: “D/O” is an acronym for disorderDisorder & FeaturesDepressive Episode?Manic Episode?Hypomanic Episode?Duration of Clinically-Significant SymptomsDuration of Symptom-Free IntervalsDistinguish From (Differential Diagnosis):Comorbidity (Often Seen With):Cyclothymic Disorder No, butepisodes only that do not meet full criteriaNoNo, butepisodes only that do not meet full criteria2+ yr. in Adults1+ yr. in AdolescentsNo longer than 2 monthsPsychotic D/OBipolar D/OBorderline PDSubstance-Induced D/OSubstance-Related D/OSleep D/OADHDMDD Major Depressive Disorder Dysthymia Persistent Depressive DisorderDMDD Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder Bipolar I Disorder Bipolar II Disorder References:
ethos essay
Write an argumentative essay of about 800 words ,Ethos means the credibility of the person making the argument—or in oth ...
ethos essay
Write an argumentative essay of about 800 words ,Ethos means the credibility of the person making the argument—or in other words, persuading with a person's good reputation or trustworthiness. If someone has good ethos, it means that we respect them and we will be more willing to believe what they say.In many arguments, the best kind of ethos comes from an expert. For example, if you wanted to get advice about what medicine to take for a bad cold, you would probably trust a doctor more than your next-door neighbor. Why? Because the doctor has better ethos. You respect a doctor's medical opinion more than some random neighbor.So argue anything you want (with an ethical focus), using credible sources (credible in the field that you're arguing).
Earn money selling
your Study Documents