Description
Pick five supplements currently on the market. Find research based on the supplements and the ingredients. What were the results? Were the studies funded by the supplement company? Is this a supplement backed by credible science? If not, why do you think that so many people are currently using it?
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Awesome! Perfect study aid.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
HIT 420 Denver School Week 11 How Informatics Is Used in Public Health Discussion
Due: Friday night at 11:59pm Mountain TimeIn this writing assignment, you will write a one- to two-page paper in which you ...
HIT 420 Denver School Week 11 How Informatics Is Used in Public Health Discussion
Due: Friday night at 11:59pm Mountain TimeIn this writing assignment, you will write a one- to two-page paper in which you describe how informatics is used in public health. In addition, you will explain how informatics relates to evidence-based practice.Step 1 Identify a recent public health concern related to health promotion or disease prevention.Determine how informatics can be used to identify this concern, provide evidence-based care, and evaluate this public health concern.Step 2 Analyze the public health concern.Include responses to the following questions as you write your paper:
Describe the recent public health concern.
How could informatics be used to locate evidence related to this health concern?
If you chose to research this topic of interest, how could informatics assist you?
How could informatics be used to improve patient outcomes or even prevent the public health concern you identified?
Cite any sources in APA format.
Telemedicine
Telemedicine can be extremely beneficial for people living in isolated regions and is currently being applied in virtually ...
Telemedicine
Telemedicine can be extremely beneficial for people living in isolated regions and is currently being applied in virtually all medical domains. To address major health issues related to affordability, access, and quality of care, healthcare providers need to consider telemedicine as a reliable option when access to traditional medicine is difficult and out of reach. Healthcare providers, however, must consider legal and ethical issues when planning, designing, and implementing telemedicine. Key among these issues are those of patient confidentiality, privacy, data security, and transmission.How does telemedicine differ from the traditional medicine?What are other legal or ethical issues involved in telemedicine?Which of these issues, in your opinion, will be the most difficult to address?What technologies or infrastructure are necessary for the successful practice of telemedicine?What obstacles can prevent healthcare providers from seeing telemedicine as a reliable option, even when access to traditional medicine is difficult or out of reach?1 page- Include references
NR505NP Chamberlain College of Nursing Week 1 Area of Interest in NP Paper
Week 1: Area of Interest in NPSelect an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which ...
NR505NP Chamberlain College of Nursing Week 1 Area of Interest in NP Paper
Week 1: Area of Interest in NPSelect an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which you would like to see a practice change occur. Conduct a review of literature to see what is currently known about the topic. Describe the scope and relevance of the issue and your recommended change. Provide reference support from at least three-four outside scholarly sources to support your ideas. References no older than 5 yearsNR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Course Knowledge _5946 Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week. view longer descriptionAnswers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 15.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding. blank Edit ratingDelete rating 14.0 to >12.0 pts Very Good Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding _6391 Edit ratingDelete rating 12.0 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding. _9772 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question with little depth and lack of application of experiences, knowledge, or understanding. _254 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not address the initial question(s). blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 15.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty _9902 The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue. view longer descriptionThe student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 10.0 to >9.0 pts Excellent Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. _2051 Edit ratingDelete rating 9.0 to >8.0 pts Very Good Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. _1790 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Responds to a student peer and/or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion. _2272 Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Responds to a student peer or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion. _5659 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No response post to another student or course faculty. _5169 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10.0 pts Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Evidence _3605 Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years. view longer descriptionAssigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:<br/> 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 15.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lessons AND • at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.* _8035 Edit ratingDelete rating 14.0 to >12.0 pts Very Good Integrates evidence from: • no assigned readings OR online lesson is included • at least one outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.* _1235 Edit ratingDelete rating 12.0 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.* _6547 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are not credited.* _3229 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not integrate any evidence. _231 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 15.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Communication _4427 view longer description Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >4.0 pts Excellent Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (0–1 error in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _8976 Edit ratingDelete rating 4.0 to >3.0 pts Very Good Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (2–3 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _7976 Edit ratingDelete rating 3.0 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (3–4 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _1214 Edit ratingDelete rating 2.0 to >0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (5-6 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _6128 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the post (7 or more errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). _5325 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation _2725 view longer description Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >4.0 pts Excellent References have complete information as required by APA (0-1 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _4930 Edit ratingDelete rating 4.0 to >3.0 pts Very Good References have most information as required by APA (2 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _579 Edit ratingDelete rating 3.0 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory References have some information as required by APA (3 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _5548 Edit ratingDelete rating 2.0 to >0.0 pts Unsatisfactory References have some information as required by APA (4 errors). In-text citations included for all references AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _8749 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory References missing 5 or more elements AND/OR In-text citations missing OR final references not included for in-text citations. _8728 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5.0 pts --
11 pages
Rising Cost Of Pharmaceuticals Fo The Aging Population
Healthcare Delivery Systems Research Paper: A Gap in the Rising Cost of Pharmaceuticals This final project paper will be a ...
Rising Cost Of Pharmaceuticals Fo The Aging Population
Healthcare Delivery Systems Research Paper: A Gap in the Rising Cost of Pharmaceuticals This final project paper will be addressing the rising cost of ...
And the Band Played On Film and Psychosocial Stressors Discussion
Please watch the film, And the Band Played On. This film may be available on the Internet through free sites such as You ...
And the Band Played On Film and Psychosocial Stressors Discussion
Please watch the film, And the Band Played On. This film may be available on the Internet through free sites such as Youtube and Vimeo (please note: accessing these sites is at your own risk). You may also view the film for purchase online through sites such as Amazon or HBO.Movie: And the Band Played On (1993), Roger Spottiswoode (Director). Depicts how the CDC discovered how HIV was being transmitted. The film is both entertaining and educational, and it depicts the principles of epidemiology, human behavior, and society's view of controversial topics.
What factors inhibited the early war against acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)? Do you believe the AIDS outbreak could have been stopped? Why or why not? What role does advocacy play in the film? How much publicity does HIV/AIDS receive today? What’s the story of HIV/AIDS in the 21st century? Explain.
Discussion Prompt #2
How do occupation and culture influence psychosocial stressors that affect middle-aged adults? How does your occupation influence psychosocial stressors?
Florida National University The Andrews and Boyle TIP Model Questions
A nurse on a surgical unit mentions that she would like to know more about various cultures and how to take care of patien ...
Florida National University The Andrews and Boyle TIP Model Questions
A nurse on a surgical unit mentions that she would like to know more about various cultures and how to take care of patients with diverse cultural backgrounds.How could you use the Andrews/Boyle TIP Model to support her wish to provide culturally competent care?Give an example of how the surgical nurse might use the Andrews/Boyle TIP Model in her everyday practice.A minimum of 2 evidence-based references no older than 5 years are required. A minimum of 500 words are required.3 PARAGRAPHS FOR EACH QUESTION AND AT LEAST 3 REFERENCES APA STYLE.
Similar Content
Cerro Coso Community College Medical Coding Chest Pain Paper
Medical Coding Expert. Instructions: Assign ICD-10 and CPT/HCPCS codes for this surgical pathology case study.My answers a...
Explain the pathology of esophagus and the stomach.
Explain the pathology of esophagus and the stomach. 10 to 15 powerpoints in APA system,plagiarism free!!!!!!!...
physician services market and cost savings, health and medicine homework help
Please see attachment. ...
The University of Alabama at Birmingham Ethical Leadership Concept Discussion
...
Describe how ageism can deprive seniors of choice, independence, dignity, and negatively impacts their quality of life, health and medicine homework help
Describe how ageism can deprive seniors of choice, independence, dignity, and negatively impacts their quality o...
comparison matrix and outline, write a paper (850-1,000 words), health and medicine homework help
write a paper (850-1,000 words) that compares all three of the articles. A statement of common elements and themes a...
Week 6 Discussion Forum.edited
Having watched the video of Hurricane Sandy, I was impressed by how the authorities and other stakeholders urged everyone ...
Nursing Role
As a nursing student, I ensure to share values of autonomy, commitment to public service, and commitment to lifelong educa...
20200415194640request For Proposal Template For Health Information Technology 1 1
The National Learning Consortium (NLC) is a virtual and evolving body of knowledge and tools designed to support healthcar...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Glass Palace
by Amitav Ghosh
The Great Gatsby
by Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald
The House of the Seven Gables
by Nathaniel Hawthorne
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
by James Joyce
Night
by Elie Wiesel
Jane Eyre
by Charlotte Brontë
The Secret Life of Bees
by Sue Monk Kidd
The Road
by Cormac McCarthy
Big Little Lies
by Liane Moriarty
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
HIT 420 Denver School Week 11 How Informatics Is Used in Public Health Discussion
Due: Friday night at 11:59pm Mountain TimeIn this writing assignment, you will write a one- to two-page paper in which you ...
HIT 420 Denver School Week 11 How Informatics Is Used in Public Health Discussion
Due: Friday night at 11:59pm Mountain TimeIn this writing assignment, you will write a one- to two-page paper in which you describe how informatics is used in public health. In addition, you will explain how informatics relates to evidence-based practice.Step 1 Identify a recent public health concern related to health promotion or disease prevention.Determine how informatics can be used to identify this concern, provide evidence-based care, and evaluate this public health concern.Step 2 Analyze the public health concern.Include responses to the following questions as you write your paper:
Describe the recent public health concern.
How could informatics be used to locate evidence related to this health concern?
If you chose to research this topic of interest, how could informatics assist you?
How could informatics be used to improve patient outcomes or even prevent the public health concern you identified?
Cite any sources in APA format.
Telemedicine
Telemedicine can be extremely beneficial for people living in isolated regions and is currently being applied in virtually ...
Telemedicine
Telemedicine can be extremely beneficial for people living in isolated regions and is currently being applied in virtually all medical domains. To address major health issues related to affordability, access, and quality of care, healthcare providers need to consider telemedicine as a reliable option when access to traditional medicine is difficult and out of reach. Healthcare providers, however, must consider legal and ethical issues when planning, designing, and implementing telemedicine. Key among these issues are those of patient confidentiality, privacy, data security, and transmission.How does telemedicine differ from the traditional medicine?What are other legal or ethical issues involved in telemedicine?Which of these issues, in your opinion, will be the most difficult to address?What technologies or infrastructure are necessary for the successful practice of telemedicine?What obstacles can prevent healthcare providers from seeing telemedicine as a reliable option, even when access to traditional medicine is difficult or out of reach?1 page- Include references
NR505NP Chamberlain College of Nursing Week 1 Area of Interest in NP Paper
Week 1: Area of Interest in NPSelect an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which ...
NR505NP Chamberlain College of Nursing Week 1 Area of Interest in NP Paper
Week 1: Area of Interest in NPSelect an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which you would like to see a practice change occur. Conduct a review of literature to see what is currently known about the topic. Describe the scope and relevance of the issue and your recommended change. Provide reference support from at least three-four outside scholarly sources to support your ideas. References no older than 5 yearsNR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Course Knowledge _5946 Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week. view longer descriptionAnswers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 15.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding. blank Edit ratingDelete rating 14.0 to >12.0 pts Very Good Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding _6391 Edit ratingDelete rating 12.0 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding. _9772 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question with little depth and lack of application of experiences, knowledge, or understanding. _254 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not address the initial question(s). blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 15.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty _9902 The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue. view longer descriptionThe student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 10.0 to >9.0 pts Excellent Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. _2051 Edit ratingDelete rating 9.0 to >8.0 pts Very Good Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. _1790 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Responds to a student peer and/or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion. _2272 Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Responds to a student peer or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion. _5659 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory No response post to another student or course faculty. _5169 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 10.0 pts Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Evidence _3605 Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years. view longer descriptionAssigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:<br/> 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years. Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 15.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lessons AND • at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.* _8035 Edit ratingDelete rating 14.0 to >12.0 pts Very Good Integrates evidence from: • no assigned readings OR online lesson is included • at least one outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.* _1235 Edit ratingDelete rating 12.0 to >8.0 pts Satisfactory Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.* _6547 Edit ratingDelete rating 8.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are not credited.* _3229 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Does not integrate any evidence. _231 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 15.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Communication _4427 view longer description Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >4.0 pts Excellent Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (0–1 error in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _8976 Edit ratingDelete rating 4.0 to >3.0 pts Very Good Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (2–3 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _7976 Edit ratingDelete rating 3.0 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (3–4 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _1214 Edit ratingDelete rating 2.0 to >0.0 pts Unsatisfactory Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (5-6 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). _6128 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the post (7 or more errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). _5325 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5.0 pts -- Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation _2725 view longer description Range threshold: pts Edit ratingDelete rating 5.0 to >4.0 pts Excellent References have complete information as required by APA (0-1 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _4930 Edit ratingDelete rating 4.0 to >3.0 pts Very Good References have most information as required by APA (2 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _579 Edit ratingDelete rating 3.0 to >2.0 pts Satisfactory References have some information as required by APA (3 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _5548 Edit ratingDelete rating 2.0 to >0.0 pts Unsatisfactory References have some information as required by APA (4 errors). In-text citations included for all references AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors). _8749 Edit ratingDelete rating 0.0 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory References missing 5 or more elements AND/OR In-text citations missing OR final references not included for in-text citations. _8728 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts / 5.0 pts --
11 pages
Rising Cost Of Pharmaceuticals Fo The Aging Population
Healthcare Delivery Systems Research Paper: A Gap in the Rising Cost of Pharmaceuticals This final project paper will be a ...
Rising Cost Of Pharmaceuticals Fo The Aging Population
Healthcare Delivery Systems Research Paper: A Gap in the Rising Cost of Pharmaceuticals This final project paper will be addressing the rising cost of ...
And the Band Played On Film and Psychosocial Stressors Discussion
Please watch the film, And the Band Played On. This film may be available on the Internet through free sites such as You ...
And the Band Played On Film and Psychosocial Stressors Discussion
Please watch the film, And the Band Played On. This film may be available on the Internet through free sites such as Youtube and Vimeo (please note: accessing these sites is at your own risk). You may also view the film for purchase online through sites such as Amazon or HBO.Movie: And the Band Played On (1993), Roger Spottiswoode (Director). Depicts how the CDC discovered how HIV was being transmitted. The film is both entertaining and educational, and it depicts the principles of epidemiology, human behavior, and society's view of controversial topics.
What factors inhibited the early war against acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)? Do you believe the AIDS outbreak could have been stopped? Why or why not? What role does advocacy play in the film? How much publicity does HIV/AIDS receive today? What’s the story of HIV/AIDS in the 21st century? Explain.
Discussion Prompt #2
How do occupation and culture influence psychosocial stressors that affect middle-aged adults? How does your occupation influence psychosocial stressors?
Florida National University The Andrews and Boyle TIP Model Questions
A nurse on a surgical unit mentions that she would like to know more about various cultures and how to take care of patien ...
Florida National University The Andrews and Boyle TIP Model Questions
A nurse on a surgical unit mentions that she would like to know more about various cultures and how to take care of patients with diverse cultural backgrounds.How could you use the Andrews/Boyle TIP Model to support her wish to provide culturally competent care?Give an example of how the surgical nurse might use the Andrews/Boyle TIP Model in her everyday practice.A minimum of 2 evidence-based references no older than 5 years are required. A minimum of 500 words are required.3 PARAGRAPHS FOR EACH QUESTION AND AT LEAST 3 REFERENCES APA STYLE.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents