Description
Freedom of religion and separation of church and state are controversial areas. Some people believe that abandoning the Judeo-Christian heritage of the United States is detrimental to the country. Others want to express their own religious beliefs without having other beliefs imposed upon them. Yet both of these opinions are but two sides of the same coin, for by virtue of not establishing a particular religion, the state allows everyone the freedom to practice their own beliefs. The United States has a strong history of religious freedom and separation of church and state. The original settlers to America left England because of religious persecution and were free to practice their own religion in the new country. Thus, the separation of church and state was an important issue when the Constitution was being written and is a well-established doctrine in American political history.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Review the article “Jefferson’s Legacy to the Supreme Court: Freedom of Religion.” Focus on the history of freedom of religion and the separation of church and state.
Examine how the Supreme Court ruled on freedom of religion cases as well as the degree to which the separation of church and state argument came into play.
Review the U.S. Supreme Court cases, City of Boerne v. Flores and Texas v. Johnson. Consider how the court used separation of church and state to rule on each of these cases.
Reflect upon the relevance of the concept of separation of church and state in American society today, given the current political climate and demographics.
The Assignment: (3–4 pages)
Briefly explain the scope of freedom of religion. Explain to what degree freedom of religion applies to the practice and expression of religion and the display of religious symbols in the United States.
Briefly explain the rationale for freedom of religion.
Explain how federal and/or state courts have used the concept of separation of church and state to rule on freedom of religion cases. Be specific and use examples to illustrate your explanation.
Based on the cases you read this week, the demographics of the United States, and the current political climate in the United States, explain your thoughts about the current relevance of the concept of separation of church and state. Justify your response. If you live outside the United States, you can compare these to the political climate in your own country or region.
Support your response using the Learning Resources and other scholarly resources.
Articles
Perry, B. A. (2006). Jefferson's legacy to the Supreme Court: Freedom of religion. Journal of Supreme Court History, 31(2), 181–198. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5818.2006.00134.x
Cases
City of Boerne v. Flores, Archbishop of San Antonio, and United States 521 U.S. 507 (1997).
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
Hustler Magazine and Flynt v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1987).
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).
Optional Resources
Articles
Copeland, L. (2003, August 21). 10 Commandments appeal fails: Monument ordered out of Ala. building [Final edition 1]. USA TODAY, p. A01.
Schemo, D. J. (2001, October 23). After a surge, limits return to school prayer [Late edition: East Coast]. New York Times, p. A16.
Associated Press. (2005, August 11). Court rejects challenge to pledge of allegiance [Late edition: East Coast]. New York Times, p. A19.
Delahunty, R., & Yoo, J. (2003). Against foreign law. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 29, 291–330. Retrieved from http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol2...
Posner, R. (2015). The law of the lands: How the U.S. Supreme Court engages with the world. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essa...
Bernes, R. (2015). Supreme court says president’s powers prevail on foreign borders. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law...
Websites
Separation of Church and State
Explanation & Answer
Hello, review the attached document and contact me in case you need any changes. Otherwise, good luck in your study and if you need any further help in your assignments, please let me know. Always invite me to answer your questions.
Running head: THE PROS AND CONS OF FREE TRADE
The Pros and Cons of Free trade
Name
Institution Affiliation
1
The Pros and Cons of Free trade
2
What is Free Trade? The free trade movement and mainstream media have for decades
propagated the notion that free trade is a win-win proposition. According to the movement, free
trade is merely a trading system that allows countries to exchange goods and services without the
constraints of quotas, duties, and tariffs. All this, while enabling the participants to focus on their
core competitive advantage thereby maximizing their economic output and fostering income
growth for their citizens (Heing, 2018). But critics argue that a close examination of the concept
of free trade and its impacts reveals a rather satirical image where the oligarchs and the elites of
our society plunder the benefits at the expense of the citizens. This paper examines the pros and
cons of free trade in an attempt to determine whether one outweighs the other.
Cons
Above else, critics use the matter of labor outsourcing as the source of justification for
their attack on free trade. With it, they paint a picture of plunder, where the business and the
governing elite continue to line their pockets with cash and influence public policies to favor
them at the expense of the majority. To the critics, free trade is the lane upon which the snowball
of greedy capitalism rolls behind it leaving a footprint of pillage and plunder. The attacks on free
trade, however, bear legitimacy on several fronts. It is true that job outsourcing ultimately hurts
the local worker who now has to compete with cheaper labor abroad (Heing, 2018). Companies
will tend to move operations to countries that offer cheap labor and lax labor laws as has been
evidenced by companies such as Apple that have moved most of their manufacturing operations
to China (Kubota, 2018).
Ordinarily, lax labor laws present another problem (con) for which free trade has come to
bear the blame: poor working conditions. Countries such as China and Columbia have been
The Pros and Cons of Free trade
3
blamed for the failure to protect human rights by allowing continued exploitation of their citizens
by huge multinational corporations (Heing, 2018). In some of these countries, the corporations
operate without offering their workers essential benefits such as health benefits while paying
them meager wages. This way, the companies can make products at low average costs and thus
compete at low prices (but at the expense of the worker). Free trade is also blamed for depriving
the government of huge revenues, which could go a long way in promotin...
Review
Review
