Course Code LDR-800 Class Code LDR-800-O504 Criteria Criteria Percentage 100.0% Research Based Discussion Regarding the Similarities Between Laws, Morals, Ethics, and Religious Beliefs 20.0% Research Based Discussion Regarding the Differences Between Laws, Morals, Ethics, and Religious Beliefs 20.0% Research Based Discussion Regarding How Each of Those Forces Affects the Behavior of Individuals 20.0% Discussion of How Each of Those Forces Influence Personal Behavior 10.0% Synthesis and Argument 10.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Mechanics of Writing 5.0% APA Format 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Laws, Morals, Ethics, Religious Beliefs Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A research based discussion regarding the similarities between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is not present A research based discussion regarding the differences between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is not present. A research based discussion regarding how each of those forces affects the behavior of individuals is not present. A discussion regarding of how each of those forces influence personal behavior is not present. No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. 200.0 Less than Satisfactory (73.00%) A research based discussion regarding the similarities between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. Supportive research is not present or is inappropriate. A research based discussion regarding the differences between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. Supportive research is not present or is inappropriate. A research based discussion regarding how each of those forces affects the behavior of individuals is present, but incomplete or inaccurate. Supportive research is not present or is inappropriate. A discussion regarding of how each of those forces influence personal behavior is incomplete, illogical, or lacking reasoned support. Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (82.00%) A research based discussion regarding the similarities between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is present, but may be somewhat flawed or remains cursory. It is supported by little or antiquated scholarly research. A research based discussion regarding the differences between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is present, but may be somewhat flawed or remains cursory. It is supported by little or antiquated scholarly research. A research based discussion regarding how each of those forces affects the behavior of individuals is present, but may be somewhat flawed or remains cursory. It is supported by little or antiquated scholarly research. A discussion regarding of how each of those forces influence personal behavior is presented and complete. The reasoning may be somewhat flawed. Support is minimal or antiquated. Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. Good (91.00%) A research based discussion regarding the similarities between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is complete and thorough. It is supported by sufficient scholarly research, some of which is outdated. A research based discussion regarding the differences between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is complete and thorough. It is supported by sufficient scholarly research, some of which is outdated. A research based discussion how each of those forces affects the behavior of individuals is complete and thorough. It is supported by sufficient scholarly research, some of which is outdated. A discussion regarding of how each of those forces influence personal behavior is thorough and well-reasoned. Support is sufficient but some sources are outdated. Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) A research based discussion regarding the similarities between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is thorough, detailed, and insightful. It is supported by sufficient current scholarly research. A research based discussion regarding the differences between laws, morals, ethics, and religious beliefs is thorough, detailed, and insightful. It is supported by sufficient, current scholarly research. A research based discussion regarding how each of those forces affects the behavior of individuals is thorough, detailed, and insightful. It is supported by sufficient, current scholarly research. A discussion regarding of how each of those forces influence personal behavior is thorough, detailed, and insightful. Support is sufficient and current. Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment