Description
There are three different essay prompts. you must choose one. each essay is that same requirements of 5 pages double spaced.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
I appreciate working with you! In case of any further edits, please do not hesitate to let me know! See you soon! Remember me as always! Would love and appreciate to work with you in the future! Goodbye
Running head: BOOK ANALYSIS OF FRANKENSTEIN
BOOK ANALYSIS OF FRANKENSTEIN
(Author’s name)
(Institutional Affiliation)
1
BOOK ANALYSIS OF FRANKENSTEIN
2
Book analysis of Frankenstein
Based on Shelley’s novel when contextualized within the historical material as in
Chapters 19-20, it is true to say that the monster represents the French Revolution. This is
because these chapters represent the type of monstrous behaviour that demonstrated by the
French Revolution. In the story, the crowd is depicted as a monster, a terrifying being consisting
of disparate parts, a form of power created by authors of the Revolution. The monster is depicted
as fearsome force which then goes out of control of its creators to become increasingly
empowered by the growing articulation and strength of political demands of the mass industrial
workers. In other views, the monster is seen as a representation of dangerous force emanating
from the revolutionary mob that hated status quo of the political class of the time. The reading
depicts the monster’s increasing rage on the enormous tyranny and cruelty inherent of the human
institutions, political and social establishments. The monster is critical of the human society and
personality behavior. It is seen as an outsider character, a creature of which the society has no
place for1.
Frankenstein Ideology
Frankenstein reveals the attitude of indifference towards the grave and death by claiming
that his activities in plundering the grave yard and the dangers of disease, and potential infection
exposure he put himself in when creating the monster had already prepared him for revolutionary
1
Hodges, D. (1983). Frankenstein and the Feminine Subversion of the Novel. Tulsa Studies in
Women's Literature, ...