Concurrence and Burden of Proof

timer Asked: Oct 18th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $9.99

Question Description


Criminal liability is dependent on the concurrence of a criminal mental state with the commission of a criminal act; thus, the attempt to commit a criminal act may be sufficient. A substantial step made in furtherance of the commission of an offense must be taken, rather than the mere planning or preparation to commit a criminal offense. Therefore, it can be a fine line as to whether one incident may be the subject of criminal liability while the other is not. Concurrence requires that a criminal act occur at the same time the actor possessed the required criminal mental state. To convict a defendant of a given crime, prosecutors must prove to a judge or jury that all the statutory elements of a crime are present. The burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. If even one statutory element of an offense cannot be established beyond a reasonable doubt, it is concluded that criminal liability will not have been demonstrated, and the defendant will be found not guilty.

For this discussion, you will consider the concept of burden of proof in the context of concurrence by responding to the following in your main post:

  • Explain the advantages and disadvantages of our adversarial system regarding the burden of proof falling on the government to prove the concurrence of the criminal act with a criminal mind.
  • Evaluate whether a fact-finder can look into the mind of an accused to determine the way that person acted at the time of committing the crime.
  • Analyze whether the elements of concurrence are met and whether a man can be prosecuted for his wife's death in the following situation: the man has been thinking about killing his wife and thoughtfully plans the details of how he is going to carry out the crime, and then his wife is killed in a car accident that he had nothing to do with.

Tutor Answer

School: Boston College

please find the attached file. i look forward to workng with you again. good bye


Concurrence and Burden of Proof




Concurrence and Burden of Proof
Generally, all suspects presented before courts of law are presumed innocent until proven
guilty by a competent court of law. The entire process has to be free, fair and credible to ensure
that justice is served. For any case of criminal incidents, concurrence does require that any
criminal act should correlate at the time the actor possessed required and stable mental state. It is
the role of state prosecutors to prove to the jury that indeed there is burden of proof as supported
by substantive evidence. This is the rationale behind some criminal cases taking longer time than...

flag Report DMCA

Tutor went the extra mile to help me with this essay. Citations were a bit shaky but I appreciated how well he handled APA styles and how ok he was to change them even though I didnt specify. Got a B+ which is believable and acceptable.

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors