Description
Critical Evaluation Essay Structure
Thesis statement: Lincoln (whatever author you choose) used ethos when...used pathos when...used logos when....
Para 2: Ethos
Para 3: Logos
Para 4: Pathos
Para 5: Conclusion
ethos (credibility), pathos (emotion), and logos (fact)
Place your thesis as the last sentence of the first paragraph. (Google Funnel Introduction paragraph)
When you have a thesis with matching body paragraphs, this is called the 5 paragraph essay structure.
Choose one argument from the historic American works listed in the “Supplemental Readings” section of the course lessons. Decide whether this argument is successful or not. If you decide this essay is successful, discuss why. You may use the structure of the argument, the tone, and the various types of support (ethos, pathos, and logos) as proof of the argument’s success. Make sure that your thesis has an introduction that contains a hook and a thesis, body paragraphs that discuss one proof at a time (one paragraph per example), and a conclusion. If you decide that the essay is not successful, then discuss the fallacies that the argument makes. You are still required to have a strong introduction (hook and thesis), body paragraphs that discuss one fallacy at a time, and a conclusion. You may also discuss how the essay is successful with reservations. In this case, point to both the support and the fallacies you have found in the work.
This paper should be at least 700 words, but no more than 850. The paper should be formatted correctly MLA style and written in third person (do not use the words I, me, us, we, or you). The essay should also contain citations and a works cited list based on your selected essay in the assigned readings. Formulate the structured response from your own close reading of the text. Do not use outside sources (open Web) without explicit permission from the instructor.
READING ASSIGNMENT:
http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/wiesel.htm
MLA FORMAT EXAMPLE - https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/m...
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
OUTLINE
1. INTRODUCTION
2. BODY
3. CONCLUSION
4. REFERENCE
LAST NAME1
Student Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Instructor:
Course Title:
Date:
The Perils of Indifference
The reading about the perils of indifference portrays the historical perception as well as
the inactive participation of several liberal parties during the time the Nazi German used to
torment the Jews. The imaging question concerning whether the past events still trailed into the
present democracy tenure or if the encountered indifference would continuously cloud the minds
of different international leaders (Schuster et al., 1). While perusing through the Elie Wiesel's
speech, indifference emerges as an offense, chastisement, and in some examples a cruel act
illustrating the vicious nature of an individual. Throughout the discourse, no one cares about the
other's welfare, and the reverse holds when it ends. Therefore, the paper explores the use of the
ethos, logos, and pathos to support the argument of the reading.
At first sight of the entire reading, it was quite confus...