# I want a reply post to the below post in 150 words

Anonymous
account_balance_wallet \$5

### Question Description

1. Using expected rule, is it economically better to make or buy the component?

In the case study of Teloxy Engineering, initially, it has been decided that ten thousand pieces of components at \$60 each should be bought. So, the total amount allocated for the procurement was \$650,000 including \$50,000 for scrap. Later it has been found that higher-quality component costing \$72 each should be used for each product. But, it should numerically cost \$720,000, excluding the scrap, if they are to proceed with the idea of procuring the higher quality material. Now, with the idea of the manufacturing team that they can produce equal quality material at \$40 per piece but with \$100,000 setup costs meant that the total cost of components now will stand at \$(40X10,000 + 100,000) = \$500,000. But, this amount is required without taking into consideration the probability of occurrence of defective pieces. According to what the manufacturing team has provided the probability of such occurrence should be either (10/100)X0= 0 or (20/100)X(10/100) = .02 or (20/100)X(30/100)=.06 or(30/100)X(25/100)=.075 or (40/100)X(15/100) =.06.In total, the probability is 0+.02+.06+.075+.06 or .215 or 21.5% of the 10,000 units produced or 2150 pieces. Now, the cost of repair of the defective products is \$120 per defective piece or 2150X\$120=\$258,000. So, we have to consider and add this cost to the figure of \$500,000. So, total cost of production stands at \$(500,000+258,000) =\$758,000.

Economically, it is marginally viable that they go for procurement than to go for manufacturing the parts for themselves.

2. Strategically thinking, why might management opt for other than the most economical choice?

Management might still consider the latter option if they foresee that they might require the same pieces for some other projects or as a continuation of the production of the same product in the future. In that case, since the setup cost has already been expended, they will only require the material cost to produce such components should the production continues. Otherwise, if it was a fixed quantity requirement, the former option of procurement should be considered as they still might be saving a bit of money. So, it should be well thought out by the management before taking such a decision.

FPiper
School: University of Virginia

Hey,Check at...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Good stuff. Would use again.

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors