essay1 philos

Anonymous
timer Asked: Oct 22nd, 2018
account_balance_wallet $9.99

Question Description

  • Address the following topics in your essay:• Present a universal theory of humor (you may build a hybrid view if you wish)
    o Be more detailed and nuanced in your explanation than Assignments 1 and 2o Analyze your view using the criteria from class: generality and specificity, and standard of tasteo Address and respond to any potential weaknesses to your view• Use your theory of humor to explain the limits of acceptable humor
    o According to your theory of humor, what makes a joke unacceptable or in bad taste?o Should some offensive topics be off-limits for humor? Why/why not?o Feel free to use examples from the documentary we will watch in class, The LastLaugh
  • Write a three (3) page formal essay (no title pages)
  • Use 12-point font, Times New Roman, 1-inch margins
  • Cite your sources to provide evidence and support for your argumento Use MLA format (in-text citations + works cited page)
    o http://library.csun.edu/egarcia/documents/mlacitat... Cite class readings only—outside sources are acceptable for exampleso I discourage citing the Powerpoint slides—do your own research pleaseo Failure to cite and analyze class readings will result in a loss of points
  • essay prompt,assignment1,assignment2 are in the attachment file

Unformatted Attachment Preview

MarsZulpikaer Philosophy 11 Mohsen September/17/2018 Superiority Theory or Relief Theory Most of the time philosoph, superiority theory and relief theory are theories of humor Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, relief theory or the tension release theory ​include​​ the is that laughter exists as a homeostatic mechanism that helps eliminate psychological tension while superiority theory is based on the assumption that an individual laughs at other people’s mistakes like how they accidentally fall down because the, which asserts the perpetrator’s supremacy. relief theory thinks that humor and laughter are used primarily to overcome inhibitions, which expose desires that are suppressed. Laughing at an individual because they are smiler.. The argument author claims that the existence of relief theory in the 18​th​ Century weakened the mostly false. In other words, I believe that superiority theory is better if you compared to relief theory. It is important to note that the superiority theory argues that everything is humorous because it is happening to another people. further writes that the theory was developed by Plato and continued through Aristotle. In addition, the theory postulates that people derive pleasure from other people’s pain and suffering. It confirms the fact that people laugh at jokes that are relatable to other’s stupidity, misfortune, mistakes, and weaknesses among others. Evidently, the identified vices make the perpetrators feel they belong to higher standards compared to their victims. Ultimately, the superiority theory uses laughter and humor to punish an individual’s weakness and make the perpetrators feel better about themselves.. On the other hand, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy further says that in relief or arousal theory, humor and laughter eradicates psychological tension because it allows an individual to release bad energy and face his fears, thereby, overcoming their senstvffge. The theory was developed by Sigmund Freud between 1856 and 1939. Critchley highlights the fact that Freud noted that humor or any laugh producing situations helps people enjoy their hidden desires without for them to know that much and as well save psychic energy or activity. Basically, the theory helps people deal with two different thoughts or emotions by releasing incongruity, anxiety.. Both relief and superiority theory is more concerned with mechanisms of the humorous reactions compared to the koncelpt . Furthermore, fat people jokes ,no hair jokes, disability and racist jokes among other stereotypic jokes are modern examples of commonly used forms of humor in superiority theory because they are presented in a degrading manner. Besides, unlike superiority theory, relief theory does not describe most instances of humor, especially those that occur quickly. Add to that , most cases of humor dosen’t include an energy build up, which is released, an indication that superiority theory is stronger than relief theory. At last , according to Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, relief theory is effective in case an individual exhibits anxiety and self-consciousness, which is not the case in superiority theory that entails finding humor in an individual’s misfortune, inferiority, or modesty which, in turn, justifies the perpetrator’s supremacy. Critchley, Simon. On Humour. Routledge, 2011.Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Humor: ​A Peer-Reviewed Academic Source.​ https://www.iep.utm.edu/humor/ Accessed 17 September 2018. McDonald, Paul. The Philosophy of Humour: ​Philosophy Insights. H ​ umanities-Ebooks, 2013. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Philosophy of Humor. https://platoo.stanford.edu/entries/ humor/#SupTheAccessed 17 September 2018. Maresi zulpikaer Prof. Mohsen Philosophy 11 October 9,2018 Schopenhauer Version on Incongruity Theory Incongruity theory is one of the arguments that try to explain why things are funny. This theory has over the years become the theory that is most accepted all over the world especially when explaining humor and comedy (Veatch). There are various versions of Incongruity theory that have been given by different people over the years. These versions include Schopenhauer version which states that incongruity is perceived from the concept and the real object that it claims to represent. Kant’s version which is the most widely accepted version indicates that mismatch occurs when an expectation is strained into almost nothing. Hegels’ version seemed to be similar to that of Schopenhauer but seemed to state more that, the laughter in it was a negation of the expected appearance. Bergson was one of the people who also attempted to give a perfect explanation of the theory by reducing the approach into the living and the mechanical. The most tough version of incongruity is, therefore, the version by Arthur Schopenhauer. He states that the theory is to be perceived to be between the concept and the object that it is supposed to represent in itself. In his version, he goes ahead to state that for a person to be able to understand the incongruity theory, which is the most complicated theory used compared to the superiority and relief theories, one has first to be able to understand the Ludicrous. According to the incongruity theory, therefore, people will laugh when there is an action that seems to be incomplete. It is also because the feeling of laughter is usually a feeling that gives pleasure and satisfaction and even from the realization that one can view things differently. The Ludicrous is divided into two which contains the folly and the wit. The folly is when a person finds themselves laughing unintentionally due to an action that has been done by another whereas wit is when someone makes a joke knowingly. In both instances, there is laughter though the intentions are different. It also means that the laughter is from the realization of the real world which has surpassed one’s perception. In determining this theory, some criteria are used in its analysis. This criterion involves generality, specificity, and standard of taste. In generality, most of the arguments that exist seek to provide predictions that emanate from the observed behaviors which however do contain variables that intervene which at times are a presentation of different psychological processes. In this case incongruity theory by generality is a theory that tries to explain the feeling of laughter and why people laugh. The method of laughter and the reasons to laughter is in itself a psychological process. The theory is meant to predict the reasons as to the behaviors of people and the ideas that cause laughter. Specificity refers to the degree in which a particular subject relates uniquely with the thing that is supposed to explain. In incongruity theory, though it is complicated, it describes more and gives a better understanding of why people engage in laughter, comedy, and situations of humor. With the different versions of people like Kant and Schopenhauer, they create a clear perspective that humor is as a result of a perceived concept and the real object and a sudden transformation of an expectation that is reduced to nothing. This theory, therefore, has more specificity when it is compared with theories like the relief theory which describes humor as a way to relieve tension in stressing situations and instances of fear or the superiority theory where people laugh at an occurrence because it proves them to be more superior. The standard of taste is also a criterion that is used which in analyzing incongruity theory. The standard of taste is the response and preference of a particular explanation that gives us the most satisfaction and pleasure. Incongruity theory gives more pleasure to theories like the relief and superiority theories that people cannot relate. People have widely accepted it as it provides a reasonable view. It, therefore, means that the standard of the taste of this theory is high. The theory cannot also explain a situation where there is a lack of humorous response even though a purported incongruity had presented itself. I believe this weakness can be addressed by looking at the different groups of people for one to be able to understand the outcome. It means that an inconsistency may not have the desired response as it has been told to the wrong group of persons or was intended to be rhetorical. Work Cited VEATCH, THOMAS C. "A theory of humor" Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 11.2 (2009): 161-216. PHIL 11 Essay 1: Humor and Taste Due via Canvas by Tuesday 10/23 at 11:59pm (Note: I am extending the deadline from 10/18 to 10/23) Address the following topics in your essay: • Present a universal theory of humor (you may build a hybrid view if you wish) o Be more detailed and nuanced in your explanation than Assignments 1 and 2 o Analyze your view using the criteria from class: generality and specificity, and standard of taste o Address and respond to any potential weaknesses to your view • Use your theory of humor to explain the limits of acceptable humor o According to your theory of humor, what makes a joke unacceptable or in bad taste? o Should some offensive topics be off-limits for humor? Why/why not? o Feel free to use examples from the documentary we will watch in class, The Last Laugh Format: • Write a three (3) page formal essay (no title pages) • Use 12-point font, Times New Roman, 1-inch margins • Cite your sources to provide evidence and support for your argument o Use MLA format (in-text citations + works cited page) o http://library.csun.edu/egarcia/documents/mlacitation_quickguide.pdf o Cite class readings only—outside sources are acceptable for examples o I discourage citing the Powerpoint slides—do your own research please o Failure to cite and analyze class readings will result in a loss of points WARNING: • Submitting this assignment to Canvas will check for plagiarism and originality through Turnitin.com. Don’t cheat—it’s not worth it. I report all instances of plagiarism to the Honor Council. • I only accept the following file formats: doc, docx, pdf, txt, and rtf (Google docs and Pages files are unacceptable). If you do not use the proper file format then the assignment will receive a 0. • Also, Canvas/Turnitin.com will not process file names that include special characters or dashes. If Canvas/Turnitin.com does not accept your file then it will receive a 0. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

Perfectsolutions
School: New York University

find the attached completed paper. Please leave a good review. If you have another one please invite me to bid. Thanks

Running head: RELIEF THEORY OF LAUGHTER

Relief Theory of Laughter
Student’s Name
Institution

1

RELIEF THEORY OF LAUGHER

2
Relief Theory of Laughter

“Engaging in comic relief will definitely help ease the tension in the room.” Such is a
statement commonly used in reference to the importance of laughter in creating an ideal
environment, away from the tension within the environment in question. Consequently, it
remains universally acceptable that laughter and humor could be highly consequential in
changing the environment within which it occurs, as the parties involved appreciate the possible
irrationality involved. Humor is a relief that helps make potentially adverse conditions
acceptable. It could make potentially vulgar language acceptable, simply because the language
use is intended to bring about laughter among the audience. To this extent, the relief theory of
laughter makes an ideal explanation of a universal understanding of humor, within it explaining
the impact of disproportionali...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations !

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors