Case Analysis

Anonymous
timer Asked: Oct 22nd, 2018
account_balance_wallet $25

Question Description

Need a case study developed on the discrimination of black and African American women who are employed at AT&T. I need to form a case on the important facts and to be able to prove my case about professional codes of ethics and the law. The last 2 attached files on the right are the main 2 pieces you will need to form a case.

Tutor Answer

Tutorabby
School: UCLA

Please find the completed work,And again, its unfortunate that we do not share emails here I am going to upload the work here in a few minutes.

Running Head: CASE ANALYSIS

1

Case Analysis
Professor’s name
Student’s Name
Course
Date

CASE ANALYSIS

2

Ethical issues in the case study
The case study of AT&T brings us to the topic of discrimination against black women and
African American employees (Mitchell, 2016). Some of the ethical issues in this situation include
human resource based ethics, some of which include diversity discrimination where there are
biasness and favouritism where the HR chooses those he likes regardless of the qualifications
needed.
The most urgent ethical issue is diversity discrimination; in our case, we see how the
company uses race to discriminate its employees. There is also discrimination of the minority
sector. This is an immediate issue since it deprives people of chances to do better, it doesn’t give
them opportunities to showcase whatever abilities they have.
The most relevant ethical model, in this case, is justice, where the management ensures
everybody is treated fairly regardless of who or where they come from. Rights can also be applied
since everyone is entitled to equal opportunities. The model of utilitarianism can be slightly used
since it will ensure there is balance and that those involved are not in any way harmed (Lucas et al,
2016).
Pertinent facts of the case
This case involves a number of facts, some of which are more important and some are less
important. A more important fact, in this case is the discrimination of women and minorities
within the company. It can also be said that there is inequality within the company. On the other
hand, the less important fact is that at first, the civil right department could not notice what
happens in the company and also we can say the company lacked sound management before the
legal intervention.
Company’s code of ethics which applies to this situation is equality and fairness to
employees since every organization is expected to treat its employees fairly and just; but as seen,
the company did the opposite. Managers also had professional ethics, some of which include
integrity. They should have upheld integrity and do the right thing by giving everyone an equal
chance.

CASE ANALYSIS

3

Stakeholders, harm, benefits, and risks
The first stakeholders, in this case, are the employees, in which it includes managers since
both of them are directly involved in the case. It is also evident that business group unions are
stakeholders i.e. secondary in this situation since they have to fight for the employees’ rights
therefore they are involved in in one way or another.
According to ...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations !

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors