Personality and Motivation—Analyze a Personality

Anonymous
timer Asked: Oct 22nd, 2018
account_balance_wallet $30

Question Description

Demonstrate your understanding of personality and motivation, and your critical thinking and writing skills, by synthesizing theories of personality and motivation as covered in your textbook readings this week. Include any theories you have discovered on your own personality and motivation research efforts. Base your response to this assignment on the personality of somebody with whom you have direct experience in the workplace—it could be a peer, a manager or a subordinate.

  1. Describe the person’s personality broadly (either as described by the “Big Five” model, or by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from Chapter 9 of your textbook).
  2. Given what you know of the personality under examination, explain which theory, or theories, of motivation would be most effective for a manager to use when trying to help this individual achieve his or her full potential at work.
  3. Describe the process of determination, and the theory, or theories, you eventually recommend.
  4. Explain how the manager can use the tenets of that theory, or those theories, as applied to the person who serves as your case study.

Your well written paper should meet the following requirements:

Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing—which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from outside scholarly sources, which both help to bolster your own assertions, as well as supplement your ideas.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

10/22/2018 Module 2: Critical Thinking MGT300 Mod 2 CT https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/3929/assignments/64524 1/4 10/22/2018 Module 2: Critical Thinking Criteria Requirements Content Ratings 15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation The paper demonstrates an understanding of personality, motivation, and theories of personality or the paper details soft skills needed in the workplace for volunteering and internships. The paper includes all of the required components as specified in the assignment, 3-4 pages in length, APA formatting, and scholarly sources. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources, and references key concepts with intext citations to support answers. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Pts 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 15.0 pts https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/3929/assignments/64524 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 10.0 pts 2/4 10/22/2018 Module 2: Critical Thinking Criteria Critical Thinking Analysis Sources / Examples Ratings 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis into theories of personality and motivation or an analysis of four chosen soft skills in connection with a volunteer or internship opportunity. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking. Pts 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in critical thinking. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate critical thinking. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the perspectives on the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment. https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/3929/assignments/64524 10.0 pts 10.0 pts 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 10.0 pts 3/4 10/22/2018 Module 2: Critical Thinking Criteria Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style. Demonstrates proper use of APA style. Ratings 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSUGlobal Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSUGlobal Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. Pts 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSUGlobal Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts 10.0 pts Total Points: 75.0 https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/3929/assignments/64524 4/4 ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

CASIMIR
School: Purdue University

Here you go. In case o...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Thank you! Reasonably priced given the quality not just of the tutors but the moderators too. They were helpful and accommodating given my needs.

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors