Description
I need 1 and 3 assignment in 40 hours. You can give me other assignment in 5 days. I can give you some extra tips.
1. Rough Draft:
Upload a rough draft of at least 2 pages that has you start to look at the questions and dilemmas you want to explore in a specific text. The beginning should have ideas of claims, arguments, and complexity. You want to try and impress me with thinking beyond the basics of the text. (Just delete some paragraphs from your completed paper. But don't make it looks too fragmented. I need this assignment in 40 hours.)
2. I need a completed paper of at least 4 pages.
Paper Prompt:
Using one of the texts from Le Guin, Atwood, or Wolff, write a conversation that you have in response to that text. The conversation can be in a genre of your choosing, but you should be moving towards an academic tone with correct MLA citations in this assignment.
You must use evidence from the text to ask questions, define issues, question dilemmas, or pose alternatives. We'll be focusing on skills of summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting as we start to interact, interrogate, and investigate. The main focus of this conversation is that there is a clear asking and answering around the text and that a clear argument emerges even if it is implicit.
3. Summarize, Paraphrase, and Quote
Pick a paragraph from Wolff's reading for today and paste it at the top of the document. Then, I want you to make a claim about this paragraph and integrate a summary. Then, make another claim and integrate it as a paraphrase. Then, make another claim and integrate it as a quote. You should have three paragraphs that show your ability to summarize, paraphrase, and quote and understanding the difference between the three. Upload the document here. (I need at least 1 page. I need this assignment in 40 hours.)
4. Reflection:
Reflect on the reading and writing you've done this week. What was difficult? What was easy? What was unexpected? What did you learn about your writing process and/or writing skills? Write at least three paragraphs exploring your writing. (I need at least 1 page.)
https://www.harpercollins.com/9780062470973/the-on...by Ursula LeGuin
http://www.qcc.mass.edu/plafountaine/Bread%20MAtwo...by Margaret Atwood
https://lithub.com/our-love-of-true-stories-has-de...by Rebecca Wolff
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Surname 1
Name
Professor
Course
Date
Response to Margaret Atwood’s Bread
Margaret Atwood instigates the imagination of the reader's mind in her text Bread. Her
exposition is deliberate but also artistic in the way she paints the picture of different situations
and enables the reader to familiarize him or herself with the instances of struggle. Does she
imply that the mind has the power to transform imagination into reality even if it is for a short
time? Still, she articulates the different circumstances well. Atwood is effective in executing her
goal in the text because she directs the thinking activity to the reader who becomes immersed in
the scenarios in the same way a patient in a counseling session does during hypnosis. In essence,
the significance of bread as a basic human need is apparent in all the instances, and Atwood uses
her descriptive style effectively to instigate the reader's participation in the imagination exercise
so that he or she can derive meaning.
Atwood applies repetition in her text as she mentions the word "imagine" several times.
She emphasizes that the reader's participation is based on imagination which can make a story
vivid and extend it according to the context in question. Atwood takes the reader through a stepby-step imagination process as she begins by establishing the idea of the bread. In the first
paragraph, she makes the reader imagine that he or she can access bread easily and also enjoy the
abundance of different bread spreads in his or her kitchen. Therefore, in this case, the reader
Surname 2
lacks nothing. This platform seems to be excellent for exploring explore different circumstances
because things begin on a happy, calm, and peaceful note. However, in the second paragraph,
Atwood challenges the reader's conscience by presenting a challenge while still dwelling on the
aspect of bread as an important meal. The reader imagines being with his or her sister in a slumlike place where they are both hungry, and the bread is not enough. At this point, the themes of
poverty and disease are apparent, and perhaps Atwood wants the reader to think of survival
tactics and to illustrate that life is not always exciting. The reader needs to make tough choices
even in the difficult circumstances. Atwood asks, "Should you share the bread or give the whole
piece to your sister? Should you eat the piece of bread yourself? After all, you have a better
chance of living, and you're stronger" (Atwood). In the third paragraph, Atwood complicates the
challenge further and triggers the mind of the reader to imagine being in prison without the
ability or the freedom to enjoy bread in the yellow bowl. Thus, to achieve freedom, the reader
must tell the truth that will incriminate his or her friends.
Atwood's style of writing also depicts symbolism. The bread represents significant
aspects in one's life, and it gives an interesting interpretation of various circumstances that
people deal with in their lives. Symbolism enhances the reader's familiarity with these
circumstances when they imagine. Imagination is a form of fiction, and effective writing in this
context makes the content appealing as it appears to be real. Atwood states, "You di...