Financing Health Care

User Generated

gxjvgg518

Health Medical

mn502

Aspen University

Description

Table 750 words APA format. Rubric, and assignment details included below. Young and Kroth Textbook 9th edition as 1 of 3 references.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

h Criteria Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Content O points Weight: 30% 21 points 24 points 30 points Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand: does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic. Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail. In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details. / 30 Issessment braduate Simple E Rubric Assessment - Health Care Systems - AUA8 - 09-18-18 - Sect4 - Aspen University Classroom - Microsoft Edge X Х @ https://classroom.aspen.edu/d21/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=35723&evalObjectId=258927&ievalObjectType=1& Organization Weight: 25% O points 17.5 points 20 points 25 points Organization is confusing and interferes with reader's ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. / 25 Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant: Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas: Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. B https://classroom.aspen.edu/d21/Ims/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=35723&evalObjectId=258927&evalObjectType=18 Logic/Argument Weight: 15% O points 10.5 points 12 points 15 points Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment / 15 Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. Support Weight: 20% O points 14 points 16 points 20 points Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in- text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. / 20 Issessment braduate Simple Rubric Assessment - Health Care Systems - AUA8 - 09-18-18 - Sect4 - Aspen University Classroom - Microsoft Edge X Х https://classroom.aspen.edu/d21/Ims/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=35723&evalobjectId=258927&evalObjectType=18 O points 7 points 8 points 10 points Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10% Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience- appropriate language are used. / 10 Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Issessment Total / 100 1 O 1 https://classroom.aspen.edu/d21/le/content/35723/viewContent/1755538/View X ... Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention Firstlnitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append. Start by reading and following these instructions: 1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus. 2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully. 3. Consider the discussions and any insights gained from it. 4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling. Assignment: Professional Development Assignments: Compare and contrast each of the three questions related to Managed Care Organizations, Medicare, and Medicaid with one another and explain how they were similar and different to each other. 1. Managed care organizations emphasize physicians' responsibilities to control patient access to expensive hospitalization and specialty care, a principle dubbed "gatekeeping." Some argue that "gatekeeping" is unethical because it introduces financial factors into treatment decisions. Others say it improves quality by promoting the use of the most appropriate levels of care. 2 Medicare is an area that often gets overlooked and is seen as a burden financially. Discuss alternatives to ease the drain on Medicare resources 3. Medicaid is shouldering an ever-increasing burden of cost for long-term care for the elderly, with enormous impacts on state budgets throughout the nation. Discuss alternatives to ease this drain on Medicaid resources Please submit one APA formatted table. (minimum 750 words) that highlights the above content make sure to include a title and reference page. The assignment should have a minimum of two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook. < > Print Download Open in Binder 3
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS

1

Healthcare Systems
Name
Institution

HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS
Managed Care gatekeeping
Managed care organizations provide a critical understanding of the existing difference
I delivery of quality healthcare among citizens. Different organizations have integrated
different concepts which help in improving the cost of improving public health. The
government has ensured that it incorporates proper measures which help define a strategic
focus on the wellbeing of public health. Public health provides a critical focus on the needs of
the individuals within the society. Public health focuses on improving the quality of life
among citizens through the prevention and treatment of disease. Managed care institution
define a greater emphasis on critical concepts which provide distinct ideas under which it is
possible to provide quality healthcare (Hall et al., 2018).
The cost of care is becoming more difficult for individuals to finance especially the
significant focus on high deductibles where individuals are forced to pay a higher amount in
addition to the insurance covers that they pay. The uncompensated care there has significantly
been increasing which has been substantially linked to the high deductibles within the current
healthcare insurance system. There is a need to evaluate the underlying decisions to make...

Similar Content

Related Tags