A researcher conducted an experiment on the effects of a new drug on depression.  The researcher had a control group that received nothing, a placebo group, and an experimental group that received the drug.  A depression inventory that provided a measure of depression on a 50 point scale was used (50 indicates that an individual is very high on the depression variable).  The ANOVA summary table appears next, along with the mean depression score for each condition. Source                                     Df                      SS                    MS             F Between groups                                          1,202.313  Within groups                                              2,118.00  Total                                                             3,320.313 Drug condition                          Mean                n Control                                     36.26                15 Placebo                                   33.33                15 Drug                                        24.13                 15 A.  Complete the ANOVA summary table B.  Is Fobt significant at a = .05; at a = .01? C.  Perform post hoc comparisons if necessary. D.  What conclusion can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc comparisons? E.  What is the effect size, and what does this mean? F.  Graph the means.

InstructionsFINAL PROJECT - Part Two - Bridging Theory and Practice Leadership PaperThe minimum requirements of the final project are:IntroductionBiography of the leader – 1 pageContributions to society/organization – 2 pagesAnalysis of their leadership behaviors and how they use “ the language of leadership” to motivate and persuade - 3 pages.Specific recommendations, supported with academic references, to improve their leadership – 3 pages.Summary and conclusions.A minimum requirement of the paper is to identify specific behavior and refer to relevant theories to explain why the behaviors were appropriate or inappropriate in the situation faced by the leader. Both strengths and weaknesses of the leader should be identified. Issues of ethical leadership should be considered as well. The paper is not a biography.The reference section should list a minimum of ten references. Use the format as outlined in APA.The leadership paper is due by Day 6 of Week 11. The Farrakhan Factor: Minister Farrakhan demonstrated his immense leadership qualities by summoning more than 2 million Black men to the nation’s capital to show a collective will and commitment to rebuilding the Black communities. Minister Farrakhan contended that as black men, it was time for reconciliation, responsibility, and atonement.I have chosen Minister Louis Farrakhan as the leader to use in my final project. Minister Farrakhan is the leader of the Nation of Islam. Minister Farrakhan is concerned with the social, political, and economic conditions of Black people in the United States. The Minister demonstrates his concern through activism and speaking truth to the power structure.  The Minister’s leadership style is based on the concept of servant leadership.   Servant leaders strive to advocate for the needs of followers, and assist them in achieving desired goals and objectives.  Servant leadership is effective because the servant leader has a history of serving and laboring (Hickman, 2010, p. 87). Members in the Nation understand the principle of leading by example through the work of the Minister.Anyone who has observed Minister Farrakhan would come away describing him as highly intelligent and effective in communicating to any audience. The Minister has been known to be brutally honest.  Minister Farrakhan is a very humble and sincere individual.  He is ideal for advocating the cause of the poor and the oppressed, because of the shared experiences he has with poor and oppressed Americans. Although he fights primarily for Blacks, he is also a voice for all Americans and people the world over.  

The soaring cost of health care, the limitations of the economy in paying for health care, and the growing proportion of the population who are over age 65, have given rise to serious discussion, at times acrimonious, about the possible need to or the justice of rationing health care to that age group. A common definition of rationing is withholding some specific medical treatments for reasons other than a patient’s desire to have the treatment (e.g., Medicare not paying for certain treatments for very elderly patients).In your discussion, you must, from the perspective of distributive justice, summarize the major arguments on both sides (the pros and cons) of the issue of whether health care should be rationed to the elderly. You must also characterize these arguments according to whether they are primarily libertarian, utilitarian, or egalitarian in nature. Finally, you will evaluate these arguments from your view of distributive justice, explaining both how your personal life experiences and your own libertarian, utilitarian, or egalitarian views influence your evaluation.To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following required resources:Callahan, D., & Nuland, S. B. (2011, June 19). The quagmire: How American medicine is destroying itself. The New Republic, 242(8), 16-18. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database. Rationing by any other name: Reasons for resisting the push to limit medical care Should we ration end-of-life care? [Radio broadcast] Rationing health care at end of life: Student handout 3  A min of 300 words