Post a critique of the research study in which you:Evaluate the authors’ use of literature using the Use of Literature Checklist as a guide.Evaluate the problem using the Problem Statement Checklist as a guide.Explain what it means for a research study to be justified and grounded in the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be originalUse of Literature Checklist Use the following criteria to evaluate an author’s use of literature. • Look for indications of the following ways the author used literature: • Introduce a problem • Introduce a theory • Provide direction to the research questions and/or hypotheses • Compare results with existing literature or predictions • Did the author mention the problem addressed by the study? • Is the purpose of the study stated? • Are key variables in the study defined? • Is information about the sample, population, or participants provided? • Are the key results of the study summarized? • Does the author provide a critique of the literature? • Are sources cited to support points? • Are the citations to recent literature (within the past 5 years with the exception of seminal works)? • Does the literature justify the importance of the topic studied?Problem Statement Checklist Use the following criteria to evaluate an author’s problem statement: • Is a problem identified that leads to the need for this study? • Is a rationale or justification for the problem clearly stated? • Is the problem framed in a way that is consistent with the research approach? • Does the statement convey how the study will address the problem? • Are the citations to literature current (i.e., within the past 5 years with the exception of seminal works.this is the article that MUST be used. To access this article, locate the Walden Library and my login information is akkissia.slay@waldenu.edu password is pitbull93 http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/libraryIbarra, P. R., Gur, O. M., & Erez, E. (2014). Surveillance as casework: Supervising domestic violence defendants with GPS technology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(4), 417-444. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9536-4

In a 5-7 page written assessment, determine how health care technology, coordination of care, and community resources can be applied to address the patient, family, or population problem you've defined. In addition, plan to spend approximately 2 direct practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group you've chosen to work with and, if desired, consulting with subject matter and industry experts. Report on your experiences during the second 2 hours of your practicum.

Evaluating Job Analysis ApproachesThere are many approaches, often referred to as methods, to conducting a job analysis. One traditional form of job analysis is the deductive approach, which relies upon existing knowledge and taxonomies of job information during job analyses (Peterson & Jeanneret, 2007). On the other hand, one commonly used inductive approach is creating a task survey. Job analysts create a task survey by constructing a list of task statements. An accurate task statement includes the actions and people involved. For example, a task statement may be: Advise the president in the selection of personnel for the company. Many times, task statements also explain where the action is done, why it is done, and how it is done. Once the task survey is complete, subject matter experts (SMEs) rate the tasks by the frequency of performance and/or by the level of importance to the overall job. SMEs are generally people who are incumbent workers and supervisors. In contrast to task surveys tailored to a specific job or small set of jobs, organizations may prefer to use a widely distributed instrument such as the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ), which is a survey based on a set of standardized questions. The PAQ asks incumbent workers to rate the level of importance of general tasks they may encounter in their job. The PAQ can provide a standardized system to compare the similarities and differences in job skills and requirements among a variety of jobs (Harvey, Anderson, Baranowski, & Morath, 2007).How organizations determine which type of job analysis to use is dependent upon different organizational or situational factors. For example, an organizational factor may be the number of locations and job titles a company uses to accomplish a certain kind of work. A situational factor may be the specific job task the consultant is assigned to do. As a potential personnel consultant, it is important to consider how these factors influence the type of approach to use. In addition, it is important to consider what type of job analysis is most effective in court proceedings. As you discovered last week in the case of Griggs v Duke Power Co., you can lose a case if you do not select an approach to predict job performance accurately.Consider how an organization might utilize task surveys and how they might determine what type of job analysis to use.References:Harvey, J. L., Anderson, L. E., Baranowski, L. E., & Morath, R. A. (2007). Job analysis: Gathering job specific information. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Eds.), Applied measurement: Industrial psychology in human resources management (pp. 57–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Peterson, N. G., & Jeanneret, P. R. (2007). Job analysis: Overview and description of deductive methods. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Eds.), Applied measurement: Industrial psychology in human resources management (pp. 13–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.With these thoughts in mind:Post by Day 3 a comparison of the results an organization can derive from the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) and task surveys. Then, explain three organizational or situational factors that might cause you to select one approach over another. Finally, explain which approach would be more effective to use in court proceedings. Justify your response.Your post should be three paragraphs. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources in APA format.