Please see the word file attached with the 30 multiple choices. contact me if you have any questions, thanks.

Discussion 1: Trustworthiness in Qualitative ResearchUnderstanding the strategies that have been developed to address issues of trustworthiness is the first step. The second step is considering “how could I do that in my own research?” It is important to recognize that it may not be feasible for you, as a novice researcher, to implement all possible strategies.For this Discussion, you will examine quality, trustworthiness, and credibility in qualitative research and provide specific techniques and strategies.To prepare for this Discussion:Review Chapter 7 of the Ravitch and Carl course text and the Shenton article related to trustworthiness in qualitative research.Use the Course Guide and Assignment Help to search for an article related to trustworthiness and/or quality in qualitative research.By Day 3Post an explanation of how you ensure the quality, trustworthiness, and credibility of your qualitative research. Provide examples of specific techniques and strategies. Use your Learning Resources as well as the article you found in your search to support your explanation. Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing. Learning ResourcesRequired ReadingsRavitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological (2nd ed.) Sage Publications. Chapter 7, “Ethics and Relational Research” (pp. 193–232)Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 13, “Sharing the Results” (pp. 213–232) Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information 22(2), 63-75.The following articles are examples of literature reviews on the aspects of social change.Thomas, E.F., MCGarty, C., & Mavor, K.I. (2009). Transforming “Apathy into movement”: The role of prosocial emotions in motivation action for social change. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 310-333.Kezar, A. (2014). Higher education change and social networks: A review of the research. Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 91-125.Aguinis, H. & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4). 932-968.Walden University Library. (n.d.). Course guide and assignment help for RSCH 8310. Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/rsch8310

1.  The following table describes hypothetical age-specific rates of heart disease in India and the United States in 2009. Also included are hypothetical age distributions for the two countries and  the entire world population. Age Group (in years) % of Population in Age Group Heart Disease Rate per 100,000 person-years INDIA U.S.A. WORLD INDIA U.S.A. < 30 60% 30% 50% 50 75 30-55 30% 40% 30% 80 150 > 55 10% 30% 20% 120 400 ·  Calculate the crude rate of heart disease for each of the two countries. Suppose that you want to compare the rate of heart disease in India to that in the United States. You know that age is an important risk factor for heart disease. Examine the age distribution of each country’s population. ·  Should you use the two crude rates to compare the two countries? Why or why not? ·  Calculate an age-adjusted rate for heart disease in each country. Use the age distribution of the entire world as your standard. ·  Based on these answers, would you say that the age differences between India and the United States account for the entire difference in crude heart disease rates between the two countries?  Why or why not?