World War 1

User Generated

fgriraxunyvsru

Writing

Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District

Description

Were Wilson’s arguments about democracy and self-determination put into practice inside and outside of the United States during/after World War I? Include Work Citied from Each Source Provided.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

W.E.B Du Bois, "Returning Soldiers," The Crisis, XVIII (May, 1919) We are returning from war! The Crisis and tens of thousands of black men were drafted into a great struggle. For bleeding France and what she means and has meant and will mean to us and humanity and against the threat of German race arrogance, we fought gladly and to the last drop of blood; for America and her highest ideals, we fought in far-off hope; for the dominant southern oligarchy entrenched in Washington, we fought in bitter resignation. For the America that represents and gloats in lynching, disfranchisement, caste, brutality and devilish insult—for this, in the hateful upturning and mixing of things, we were forced by vindictive fate to fight also. But today we return! We return from the slavery of uniform which the world's madness demanded us to don to the freedom of civil garb. We stand again to look America squarely in the face and call a spade a spade. We sing: This country of ours, despite all its better souls have done and dreamed, is yet a shameful land. It lynches. And lynching is barbarism of a degree of contemptible nastiness unparalleled in human history. Yet for fifty years we have lynched two Negroes a week, and we have kept this up right through the war. It disfranchises its own citizens. Disfranchisement is the deliberate theft and robbery of the only protection of poor against rich and black against white. The land that disfranchises its citizens and calls itself a democracy lies and knows it lies. It encourages ignorance. It has never really tried to educate the Negro. A dominant minority does not want Negroes educated. It wants servants, dogs, whores and monkeys. And when this land allows a reactionary group by its stolen political power to force as many black folk into these categories as it possibly can, it cries in contemptible hypocrisy: "They threaten us with degeneracy; they cannot be educated." It steals from us. It organizes industry to cheat us. It cheats us out of our land; it cheats us out of our labor. It confiscates our savings. It reduces our wages. It raises our rent. It steals our profit. It taxes us without representation. It keeps us consistently and universally poor, and then feeds us on charity and derides our poverty. It insults us. It has organized a nation-wide and latterly a world-wide propaganda of deliberate and continuous insult and defamation of black blood wherever found. It decrees that it shall not be possible in travel nor residence, work nor play, education nor instruction for a black man to exist without tacit or open acknowledgment of his inferiority to the dirtiest white dog. And it looks upon any attempt to question or even discuss this dogma as arrogance, unwarranted assumption and treason. This is the country to which we Soldiers of Democracy return. This is the fatherland for which we fought! But it is our fatherland. It was right for us to fight. The faults of our country are our faults. Under similar circumstances, we would fight again. But by the God of Heaven, we are cowards and jackasses if now that that war is over, we do not marshal every ounce of our brain and brawn to fight a sterner, longer, more unbending battle against the forces of hell in our own land. We return. We return from fighting. We return fighting. Make way for Democracy! We saved it in France, and by the Great Jehovah, we will save it in the United States of America, or know the reason why. 232 AMERICA AND THE GREAT WAR 21.6. A. MITCHELL PALMER, EXCERPTS FROM "THE CASE AGAINST THE REDS: (1920) Following Germany's defeat in November 1918, much of the hostility directed toward alleged pro­ German Americans was redirected against radical labor organizers and others accused of being agents of the Bolshevik, or communist, regime in Russia. Attorney General A Mitchell Palmer pub­ lished this article in 1920 to justify his order to arrest and deport thousands of resident aliens and naturalized citizens in the so-called Palmer Raids of 1919-1920. Note his appeal to anti-Semitism by referring to Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky by his original name, Leon Bronstein, and mentioning that he once lived in New York City's Lower East Side, a Jewish neighborhood. Like a prairie-fire, the blaze of revolution was sweeping over every American institution of law and order a year ago. It was eating its way into the homes of the American workmen, its sharp tongues of revolutionary heat were licking the altars of the churches, leaping into the belfry of the school bell, crawling into the sacred comers of American homes, seeking to replace marriage vows with libertine laws, burning up the foundations of society. Robbery, not war, is the ideal of communism. This has been demonstrated in Russia, Germany, and in America. As a foe, the anarchist is fearless of his own life, for his creed is a fanaticism that admits no respect of any other creed. Obviously it is the creed of any criminal mind, which reasons always from motives impossible to clean thought. Crime is the degenerate factor in society. The whole mass of evidence, accumulated from all parts of the country, was scrupulously scanned, not merely for the written or spoken differences of viewpoint as to the Government of the United States, but, in spite of these things, to see if the hostile declarations might not be sincere in their announced motive to improve our social order. There was no hope of such a thing. By stealing, murder and lies, Bolshevism has looted Russia not only ofits material strength but of its moral force. A small clique of outcasts from the East Side of New York has attempted this, with what success we Source: A. Mitchell Palmer, ''The Case Against the 'Reds:" Forum 63 (1920): 173-85. stein, th inaugun the Kren NewY01 of thou: should, Sucl one ans· My country who wi missha1 ter, anc glitteriI racy to peasan upwarc Trotz!
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: IMPLEMENTATION OF WILSON’S ARGUMENTS

Implementation of Wilson’s Arguments about Democracy and Self-Determination inside and
Outside Of the United States During/After World War I
Names:
Institution:

1

IMPLEMENTATION OF WILSON’S ARGUMENTS
Implementation of Wilson’s arguments about democracy and self-determination inside and
outside of the United States during/after World War I
Many regions around the world had been ruled by autocrats in the period leading to
the First World War. In this case, a number of European nations such as Germany and
Kingdoms that had been formed at the time such as the Ottoman Empire, Prussia, and the
Soviet Union, among others, had been captured and annexed a number of regions belonging
to other weaker nations. When the war erupted following diplomatic clashes between some of
the greatest European powers including Germany, France, and Britain, the effects were
devastating to an extent that the US and other nations that were initially not involved in the
war took sides so as to end it and perhaps find a solution in the long run. The US was then
under the leadership of President Woodrow Wilson. The entry of the US in the war reshaped
its course as a result of the vast resources and military power that it possessed at the time and
soon the Allies gained a considerable victory over the Central Powers. Towards the end of the
war, President Wilson provided a number of fourteen conditions that were to be met before
the Allies could accept the surrender of the Central Powers (Schaller, 2013). These conditions
were focused on democracy and self-determination that was to be replicated in every part of
the world after the creation of the League of Nations. This paper will explore whether or not
Wilson’s arguments about democracy and self-determination were put into practice inside and
outside the US during and after the First World War.
Wilson’s 14 points can be best understood by analyzing them against Mihn’s response.
While Wilson’s arguments laid out in the 14 points were generalized, Mihn’s response to him
was more straightforward and covered 8 key points out of Wilson’...

Related Tags