ANSWER all of these questions.. the book we were using for this class is Words of Wisdom: Introduction to Philosophy, by Jody Ondich (an Online Educational Resource)Our textbook is located at this URL: https://mlpp.pressbooks.pub/introphil/1a. You must explain both the causal adequacy argument from Meditation 3 and the ontological argument for God’s existence in Meditation 5. You’d do well to explain each separately and then develop what you see as their relationship beyond the fact that they both are arguments for God’s existence. What I am really asking is how is that they work together? You may equally draw from my notes and the primary readings of the Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) and the videos embedded in the Syllabus. How is this an example of Descartes’s rationalism? In fact what is rationalism? Explicitly define it (1.5 pages minimum).1b. Define Hume’s empiricism. In Section 1 of the Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding (1748), Hume is very suspicious of metaphysics? Why is he suspicious of metaphysics? You’d do well to show some textual support about what he thinks about religion and metaphysics from Section 1. Next, in Section 2, he talks about the origins of our ideas (which relates to the definition you just gave of Hume’s empiricism), where does the idea of God come from in Hume? Explicitly explain his argument. Who is right: Descartes or Hume? And when you judge who is right, you cannot simply appeal to tradition, how you were raised, but instead write from the perspective as to whom has the better argument. Recall we are students of philosophy. Give reasons for why you think Descartes or Hume has the better argument (1.5 pages minimum).2. In section 3, Hume draws a distinction between relation of ideas and matters of fact. Explain them as the central distinctions in Hume’s epistemology. Next, compare and contrast where Hume thinks mathematical ideas come from with Descartes. Draw specific attention to Meditation 5 where Descartes is drawing a distinction between formal reality and objective reality. Why is it that mathematics exemplifies an innate idea for Descartes, but not for Hume? (1.5 page minimum).--------------3. Bonus Questions: You can do any of them or all of them (no limit). If you screwed up royally on previous exams, this will be a way to lessen the impact of those previous (possibly failing) efforts. At this point, you should gauge on your own how long it takes to answer each of these questions. As students, you may have to struggle on your own in future classes with what it truly takes to answer questions, so judge for yourself the length of response you want to give. As these are bonus questions, professors almost always expect the best with bonus work. A: Is Existentialist ethics possible? Why or Why not? What is the most powerful idea in existential ethics? You’d do well to target some aspect in the online article. B: Watch any of the later videos on the ontology of race that we didn’t get to. Do any of these answers explain the metaphysical nature of race? Why or why not? You’d do well to draw from your own lived-experience.C: Explain the focus on love in The Letter from the Birmingham Jail (1963) and while it’s only somewhat obvious, draw out what King thinks of community and how love is related to justice. Is he right or is he wrong? You’d do well to cite passages that lend evidence to your interpretation of what King thinks that relationship is between love and justice as these two themes relate to community.

InstructionsSchool is an important and common experience where socioemotional and moral development play out. For this assignment, you will compose a written analysis of a case study on Angela, who is in late childhood.Case Study, Angela, 10:Angela is a 10-year-old child who identifies as mixed race. Her father of Jamaican and Trinidadian descent and mother of Irish descent divorced when she was about 8 months old. Because her father moved out of state and her mother worked long hours, Angela spent a substantial amount of time with her grandmother until she was about 5 years old. Her mother, who was employed as a server, sometimes worked 10- and 12-hour shifts. Her father worked as a manager of a grocery store seafood department and was sometimes relocated to new stores.Angela has recently moved to a new location with her mom, farther from her grandma, about 30 minutes away, and into an entirely new school district. Imagine that you are Angela’s guidance counselor. Her teacher came to you recently and said, “Angela is really quite intelligent and super creative, but I have noticed she is having a difficult time making friends. Do you think you could help her?”Of course, you are willing to help one of your students, and you begin by observing Angela on the playground.You have decided to have a couple of meetings with Angela to get to know her and then hope to bring her mom into the conversation.Part IUsing your developmental psychology background (e.g., attachment, temperament, self-esteem), determine the following items: What type of attachment would you predict that Angela has with her caregivers? How would you predict that this has affected her adjustment? Explain how Angela’s cognitive and physical changes come into play. In psychology, we know that labels can be dangerous. How would you have a conversation with Angela’s mother about how Angela’s temperament and peer status might be affecting her adjustment at her new school without giving Angela a negative label? You have the impression after meeting with Angela and her mother that they are on board with being proactive in creating positive change for Angela. What three steps would you suggest Angela and her mother take that would improve Angela’s self-esteem and emotional maturity? Describe the changes that take place in the adolescent’s relationship with her parents that come into play in these three steps you suggest. Part IIThanks to your work as her guidance counselor, Angela has made a successful transition and has friends at her new school. Furthermore, she has been asked to participate in a program as a peer mentor. Angela’s school has a great deal of socioeconomic, racial, and cultural diversity. Unfortunately, there has been a significant amount of bullying due to perceptions regarding differences. Angela’s role is to help other kids in her elementary school make prosocial decisions around the issue of bullying.Once you have read the case study, answer the questions below in a single document. Your total response (for Parts I and II combined) must be at least two pages in length. Your textbook must be used as a source along with at least one additional source. All sources used must be cited and referenced according to APA guidelines. How may the role of Angela’s peers in her life be changing because she is in middle childhood? What important factors have researchers discovered that increase the likelihood of bullying? Given what you have learned about moral development in this unit, how would Lawrence Kohlberg approach Angela and her peers given his theory of moral development? What would a plan for much younger students, such as kindergarteners, look like if it were created by Angela? If Angela was working with her female peers, would you recommend a different strategy? Would that align with Carol Gilligan’s perspective? /Assignment: Instructions Assignment: Resources