Access over 20 million homework & study documents
search

CJA 355 Grant Funding Budget Evaluation Plan

Content type

User Generated

Subject

Law

Type

Other

Rating

Showing Page:
1/11
Evaluation Plan
1
Diana Easley
CJA/355 Grant Writing
Leroy Hendrix
Date: June 20, 2020

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/11
Evaluation Plan
Easley 2
GRANT FUNDING BUDGET
INTRODUCTION
Assessment of the results obtained in fundamental science is recognition in a
professional environment is called the evaluation. In the grant system, expert opinions are
the only source for assessing the level of planned research and the results obtained. The
main forms of confirmation of a scientific level are publications in leading scientific
publications, citation, reports at conferences, nomination for prestigious prizes, etc.
BENEFITS OF EVALUATION
Even a brief and fragmented comparison show that the grant system for supporting
fundamental science is “tailored” precisely to basic research and, like no other mechanism,
considers the features of this type of scientific activity. Thus, competitive financing of not
only scientific priorities but also free search, selection of projects according to the criteria of
a scientific level is an exclusive niche of scientific funds.
The results of the scientific analysis show that due to the competitive support of
funds, research works of a high international level are most often carried out. The proposed
approach to determining the possible directions and permissible scales of the
transformation of the grant system, which allows preserving its basic principles and
maximizing the use of available opportunities, is based on the following initial principles.
Grant system evaluations are considered at two levels:
• At the level of the system as a whole, having in mind a new interpretation, and in some
cases a revision of the goals and objectives of the system, due primarily to a change in the
place and role of grants in the overall process of reforming science, the forms of interaction
between the scientific community and the state;

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/11

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 11 pages?
Access Now

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1 Evaluation Plan Diana Easley CJA/355 Grant Writing Leroy Hendrix Date: June 20, 2020 Evaluation Plan Easley 2 GRANT FUNDING BUDGET INTRODUCTION Assessment of the results obtained in fundamental science is recognition in a professional environment is called the evaluation. In the grant system, expert opinions are the only source for assessing the level of planned research and the results obtained. The main forms of confirmation of a scientific level are publications in leading scientific publications, citation, reports at conferences, nomination for prestigious prizes, etc. BENEFITS OF EVALUATION Even a brief and fragmented comparison show that the grant system for supporting fundamental science is “tailored” precisely to basic research and, like no other mechanism, considers the features of this type of scientific activity. Thus, competitive financing of not only scientific priorities but also free search, selection of projects according to the criteria of a scientific level is an exclusive niche of scientific funds. The results of the scientific analysis show that due to the competitive support of funds, research works of a high international level are most often carried out. The proposed approach to determining the possible directions and permissible scales of the transformation of the grant system, which allows preserving its basic principles and maximizing the use of available opportunities, is based on the following initial principles. Grant system evaluation ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
I was having a hard time with this subject, and this was a great help.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4