Access over 35 million academic & study documents

Anselm On God

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Philosophy
School
Fordham University
Type
Homework
Rating
Showing Page:
1/1
REL100 Anselm on God's Existence
a) Suggest a question for open-ended class discussion based on that reading. Try to avoid
factual questions and aim for something that could be answered in a variety of ways.
Either/or questions are often useful, but only if you could imagine somebody reasonably
taking either side of the issue.
How well did Anselm’s reply to Guanilo support his original intent to prove that God exists?
Explain your reasoning.
b) Write 300-500 words answering the question that you proposed. Use specific textual
evidence to support your position
Generally speaking, Anselm’s reply to Guanilo weakens his original argument proving
that God exists by assuming that God exists and using God’s existence as a definition of
God. First, I will quickly recap Anselm’s argument and Guanilo’s response to it. Then, I will
break down the weak points in Anselm’s rebuttal.
Anselm originally set out to prove that God exists by offering a deductive argument based
on what he understood to be the nature of God’s being. His argument held that “God is
greater than which cannot be thought.” He also thought that things can only exist in two
ways: in our minds or in our minds and in realitythe latter being the better option.
Therefore, by merging those two arguments, he came up with the existence of Godif God is
the greatest thing that we can imagine, then the only thing better than that would have to
exist in reality.
Guanilo found some holes in Anselm’s argument, claiming that this could apply to prove
the existence of anything. He used the same structure to “prove” the existence of a lost
island filled with riches and delights. He used this metaphor to debunk Anselm’s argument
and assumptions.
Anselm’s rebuttal to this further fractured his argument. He replied that “if it can be
thought of at all, it must necessarily exist.” In other words, the argument only applies to
necessary beings. This stance assumes that God is a necessary being, which implies that
God exists. This flaw in his argument is a classic example of the begging the question fallacy.
By adding this idea of a necessary being to his definition of God, Anselm makes God’s
existence a part of the definition of God. A classic example of this fallacy is: Fruits and
vegetables are part of a healthy diet because a healthy diet includes fruits and vegetables.
The claim is made based on the premise that the claim is already true.
I think Anselm’s reply to Guanilo greatly weakened his original argument, and greatly
decreased its credibility.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Unformatted Attachment Preview
REL100 Anselm on God's Existence a) Suggest a question for open-ended class discussion based on that reading. Try to avoid factual questions and aim for something that could be answered in a variety of ways. Either/or questions are often useful, but only if you could imagine somebody reasonably tak ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
Really great stuff, couldn't ask for more.

Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents