Part 1: Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:What are some examples of classification instruments used to determine the correctional sanctions or placement for a juvenile? How do they work? How can you measure positive change while a juvenile is in secure confinement? When is probation an effective correctional strategy? When is incarceration the best option? When are other correctional alternatives more appropriate? Which types of correctional strategies are the least effective, in your opinion, and why?PART 2: RESPOND TO RESPONSES #1: Some classification instruments used to determine the correctional sanctions or placements for a juvenile would be the community of the juvenile. As well as the family or home setting they are currently in. Sometimes being in the wrong neighborhood can be an influence in the juvenile's behavior. These work by intake and classification of a juvenile in a detention facility. While they are awaiting court hearings and sentencing they are held in the detention facility. While they are there they are being classified with these instruments. One way to measure positive change while in a secured confinement is by having the juvenile participate in programming or self enrichment that the facility offers. This is one way you can monitor positive change in a juvenile. Probation is effective one the juvenile has served either their time in a facility or is released by the court with conditions. That's when the probation officer monitors the juvenile in the community and if he/she violates the terms of probation they can face another charge. Incarceration would be the best option when it comes to serious violations such as murder or manslaughter, stuff that would be endanger to others that will hurt their lives.#2: So for youthful offenders there are some options for them. They can be made to help the community by doing community service. They can be placed into house arrest, placed on probation, and even be placed into an alternative home. Community service is a sanction that can benefit the offender, the community, and may reestablish faith in the juvenile justice process. Community service offers a proactive sanction that can be used to rehabilitate or punish while holding the offender accountable to the victim and/or the community. Juvenile probation programs are ideally set up to help young people correct their behaviors without removing them from their communities. The advantages of house arrest include lower costs than detention in locked facilities, decreased rates of recidivism, and the ability to monitor the wearer's location at all times. You can see a positive change by how the juvenile acts and corrects his behavior.PART 3: Scenario: You are a probation officer or juvenile corrections officer tasked with making recommendations to a judge for a juvenile’s entire course of treatment. You can advise on the sanctions they should receive; the components of their correctional treatment; the programs, training, or institutions that should assist them; any alternatives or special conditions to consider, and; terms for their aftercare and transition back into the community.Write a 525-700-word narrative that outlines a correctional dispositional plan for a juvenile.View 1 of the selected videos from the University Library.Choose 1 of the following juveniles from the videos to use as an example case study for this week’s assignment:Donovan from Second Chance KidsRolon from Second Chance KidsShawn from Juvenile JusticeJose from Juvenile JusticeManny from Juvenile JusticeMarquese from Juvenile JusticeGina, from the Ch. 11 Critical Thinking Exercises #3 (p. 312-3)Any of the juveniles from the Week 3 court session videosNote: If you choose an example with a known correctional plan, do not propose the same plan from the original case study. Make your own recommendations for a different process for the juvenile’s treatment.Complete the following in your recommended plan for the juvenile:Summarize the outcome of the adjudication process and the disposition in this case.Describe the treatment of the juvenile in this situation.Explain the risk factors that need to be considered in the assessment of this juvenile.Explain how the combination of factors considered in this case were connected and influenced the original outcome, if any.List any additional information you would like to have before considering other correctional treatments for the juvenile.Recommend 2 alternative correctional strategies for this juvenile: 1 that includes a correctional program that exists in your state as well as 1 other potential option.Explain how you could monitor, measure, report, and support the juvenile’s progress through treatment.Justify your plan with evidence that supports your recommendations.

Bay Harbor has a midsized police department of around 70 officers, including two captains, four lieutenants, and a number of sergeants. It is among the most well-known police departments in the state, mainly due to its progressive chief, Bill Murray. He is so popular that when he took early retirement three months ago, he successfully ran for the position of mayor.When Murray was chief, the department had a friendly and accessible image among the citizens. He encouraged informal interaction between department employees and the public, and he streamlined department procedures to cut down on bureaucracy and empower employees. All officers, especially his favorite ones, enjoyed considerable professional latitude under him. Murray, in return, was assured of their loyalty and commitment to the team. The department appeared to be well run, with high levels of employee satisfaction, but it was only moderately successful in controlling crime.Murray's designated successor, Chief Tim Johnson, came from nearby Meadow Pines, where there was a much smaller department of only 13 officers. Yet, under him, Meadow Pines had the lowest crime rate ever. He is known as a strong authority figure in Meadow Pines. He reinforces that image by involving himself in every departmental decision and implementing rules with an iron hand. He monitors his officers closely, and they have to seek his clearance for almost all actions, except those that arise in an emergency.Like Murray, Johnson drove considerable policy changes as the chief of Meadow Pines; however, he rarely requested any employee feedback on the revisions. Generally, these policy changes were designed to increase supervisory control and formalize the department's procedural guidelines. This resulted in a more bureaucratic structure. Although Johnson does not appear to be as popular as Murray was, he is respected by his subordinates and by the public for lowering his community's crime rate.Many members of the hiring committee believe that Chief Johnson's stern nature will make Bay Harbor more efficient. Other members disagree and feel that his style of functioning might not work in a larger department. They also fear that citizen satisfaction with the department will decrease and that some of the more experienced officers may leave the Bay Harbor department because they do not like Johnson's leadership style.Can the leader-member exchange (LMX) theory be used to describe the relationship that Murray and Johnson shared with their subordinates? Why or why not?What are the potential benefits and pitfalls of hiring someone with Chief Johnson's style for the position at Bay Harbor? Why?What could be reasons for Chief Johnson's lack of delegation? Which approach should he use to delegate and empower officers at Bay Harbor?Is participative leadership more effective depending on the size of the department? Why? How does Murray's delegation and empowerment of his subordinates benefit a police department?What principles of dyadic relationships should Johnson use for correcting performance deficiencies at Bay Harbor? Why?