Browse over 20 million
homework answers & study documents

PSY 390 ALL DQ

Type

Homework

Rating

Showing Page:
1/6
PSY 390 ALL DQ’S
Week 1 DQ 1
In learning and cognition, one of the major areas of discussion is the impact of nature and
nurture. What is the concept of nature-nurture, and why is it important in the study of
learning and cognition? Please post your response to this thread.
The nature versus nurture debate has been around for ages, yet researchers have still not
determined which of the two greater impacts an individual. The concept of nature represents that
our personality and behavior is based upon our genetics that we receive from our family. An
example of nature would be one’s hair and eye color and body type. One’s emotions and
motivations can also be a form of nature. Research has shown that a newborn isn’t born as a
blank state, but with inherited traits. “Human nature, said the behaviorists, is determined by what
we experience. The content of the “mind” is therefore the synthesis of our experiences, and little
else” (Olson & Hergenhahn, 2009). On the other side of the fence, nurture represents that one’s
behavior is directed by experiences and surroundings. “For the Gestalt theorist, the brain is not a
passive receiver and storehouse of information from the environment. The brain acts on
incoming sensory information in such a way as to make it more meaningful and organized. This
is not a learned function; it is the “nature” of the brain to impose organization and meaning on
sensory information” (Olson & Hergenhahn, 2009). Nurture represents the fact that while
genetics offers spunk to our personality, the environment has the power to change it and form
one into the exact opposite.
Nature and nurture not only affect one’s personality but also the study of learning and cognition.
While studying the cognition of an individual or their learning style, nature and nurture can offer
explanations to their behavior. For example, is one better at learning how to read than how to do
math because of nature or nurture or both? Nature and nurture offer different ways for one to
learn a certain way or their cognitive abilities. Researchers can evaluate the environment while
still considering one’s genetics when studying learning and cognition all thanks to nature and
nurture.
Reference:
Olson, M. H., & Hergenhahn, B.R. (2009). An Introduction to Theories of Learning. [University
of Phoenix Custom Edition e-Text]. : Pearson Education, Inc. Retrieved from Univeristy of
Phoenix, PSY390 - Learning and Cognition website.
Week 1 DQ 2

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Now that we have discussed the concept of learning and cognition, I would like
you to answer the following questions: Can learning be defined as “survival of
the fittest?” Why or why not? Provide specific examples in your response. Please
post your response to this thread.
Can learning be defined as “survival of the fittest”? Well, yes, in some cases and no in
others. When one is in medical school or is doing a residency program at a hospital
learning can be defined as “survival of the fittest”. The truth of the matter is, not
everyone makes it through medical school. A lot of individuals leave medical school
after a year owing hundreds of thousands of dollars. However, on the other hands
many show their true potential and can greatly affect the world of medicine. It all
depends on learning. Individuals must be completely focused on learning so they can
intake as much information as possible with understanding what it means. On the
contrary, learning isn’t always characterized by “survival of the fittest”. For example,
in a kindergarten classroom filled with about twenty-five five and six year olds trying
to learn the alphabet, they don’t have to form an alliance to graduate. In this time of
one’s life they are simply trying to learn how to function in higher education and
society. Learning is defined by one sentence but can mean so many different things to
people all across the world. Learning can be the newborns thrive to work their fingers
or the heart surgeon introducing a new procedure for cancer. Learning can have a
competitive edge to it but not always. It all depends on the situation and people
involved and time in one’s life.
Week 2 DQ 1
One of the most interesting issues related to learning and cognition is the use of
punishment and reward. Based on what you have learned so far about
punishment and reward, do you think that criminal behavior can better be
controlled by using punishment or by using reward? Why? Please post your
response to this thread.
Criminal behavior includes a wide spectrum of possibility. It can range from speeding
to murder. In regards to punishment and reward, I feel that each individual with their
each unique case will react differently to reward and punishment. What I have learned
from the text however, has taught me that reward and punishment is more complex
and has a more in-depth meaning and effect than what I once thought. Punishment
and reward must be used in the appropriate manner and in the appropriate situation in
order to change behavior or reaction. In regards to criminal behavior I recall what
Guthrie believed, that “punishment works, not because it changes the way the
individual responds to certain stimuli. Punishment is effective only when it results in
a new response to the same stimuli” (Olson, & Hergenhahn, 2009). Punishment will
fail if the behavior in the situation is incompatible with the punished behavior. I feel

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up

Anonymous
Heard about Studypool for a while and finally tried it. Glad I did caus this was really helpful.

Anonymous
Just what I needed… fantastic!

Anonymous
Just what I needed. This document gave me a good start on tailoring my own answer.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4