Week 2 Discussion: Motivational Junk Food Versus Health Food Please remember you will want to ensure the complete support of your paper's position(s). This means providing in-text citations throughout your paper. A good rule of thumb is one citation per paragraph, for each paragraph of your paper. Make sure you’re in-text citations have a corresponding list of reference entry. Review your guide for Run your narratives through Grammarly for additional insights. Culture and optimal motivation will ideally support and reinforce one another. Managers who resist short-term, motivational fixes and focus on more long-term approaches will create an environment, over time, that helps employees manage their own motivation effectively in ways that benefit the individual and the organization. In the Optimal Motivation video, (2017), Susan Fowler identified several short-term “junk food” motivational approaches and several more effective, long-term “health food” approaches. In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own experience with these two types of approaches and use that reflection to define action steps you can take as a manager to use long-term motivational approaches with your employees. To prepare for this Discussion: Review the Optimal Motivation (2017) video from this week’s Learning Resources. Reflect on your experiences with managers throughout your career. Post a 1 single space page evaluation of the impact of managerial approaches on employee motivation and engagement. Specifically: Describe one experience in which a manager used a particular “junk food” approach and one experience where a manager used a specific “health food” approach to motivating employees. Explain the short-term AND long-term results and effects of each approach on the employees, as well as on the organization, if applicable. Formulate at least three actions you will take as a manager to ensure you are providing motivational “health food” to your employees. Note: When using specific examples from your professional experience, be sure to disguise the names of any individuals or organizations. Refer to the Week 2 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work. WMBA_6010_Week_2_Discussion_Rubric

Supply Chain MeasurementBriefly address each of the following bullets:As suggested in the lecture pages for this week, there is a significant difference in measuring the performance of a supply chain from the perspective of the customer and from the perspective of the shipper. Describe the differences between these two perspectives in supply chain design. In other words, how could shippers and customers differ in what they considered a successful supply chain transaction?How could supply chain partners measure (quantify) the performance of a supply chain? Explain why each measurement suggested is relevant to at least one of the supply chain partners.Give an example of two or more companies that participate in a single supply chain. Describe which company (or companies) would want to require each measurement that you have proposed. Explain why there would be resistance from at least one of the companies to any suggestion to eliminate each of the supply chain measurements that you have proposed. The final paragraph (three or four sentences) of your initial post should summarize the one or two key points that you are making in your initial response.Your posting should be about 1 page (400 to 500 words) in length.