Long-Term Care Management Assignment 1: A Legal and Ethical Dilemma Due Week 3 and worth 250 points Deciding to place a loved one into a long-term care facility can be extremely difficult. Even more difficult is the thought of your loved one’s rights being violated while in long-term care. Patient healthcare rights are not as clearly defined as one would expect, and there are long-term care and other healthcare facilities that create their own sets of patient rights. However, there are also certain indisputable rights afforded to patients across the board. Read the case study titled “A Legal and Ethical Dilemma”, located on pages 463-465 of your text. Next, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research information on a patient’s right to die. Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you: Describe the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Analyze the key ways in which a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. From your research, specify the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Next, take a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Provide a rationale for your position.Imagine that you are a part of the ethics committee investigating this case. Determine the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Suggest one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Provide a rationale for your response.Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Identify the factors that have led to the current realities of long-term care in the United States. Assess the various stakeholder groups of long-term care along with the nature of the relationship(s). Evaluate the impact of litigation on long-term care providers and practices. Use technology and information resources to research issues in long-term care management.Write clearly and concisely about long-term care management using proper writing mechanics. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills. Assignment 1: A Legal and Ethical Dilemma Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Describe the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Analyze the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. Weight: 30% Did not submit or incompletely described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. Partially described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Partially analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. Satisfactorily described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Satisfactorily analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. Thoroughly described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Thoroughly analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. 2. From your research, specify the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Next, take a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Provide a rationale for your position. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Did not submit or incompletely took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your position. Partially specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Partially took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Partially provided a rationale for your position. Satisfactorily specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Satisfactorily took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your position. Thoroughly specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life- sustaining procedure. Thoroughly took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your position. 3. Determine the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Suggest one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response. Partially determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Partially suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Partially provided a rationale for your response. Satisfactorily determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Satisfactorily suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. Thoroughly determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Thoroughly suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. 4. 3 references Weight: 10% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve.In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country.To Prepare:Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)Part 1: Global Health Comparison MatrixFocusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.Part 2: A Plan for Social ChangeReflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examplesPlease use proper APA format. For Part 1 the Matrix is provided. Rubric is provided. Please use these sources: or 3 credible sources within 5 yearhttps://www.who.int/about/vision/global_health_age...https://www.nursingoutlook.org/article/S0029-6554(...https://gh-bmj-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/content/...

Everything is highlighted. The hyperlink leads to a video. This is a virtual presentation & I will be the Pro Debator. Please include an outline that will assist me in debating with the Con debator.