Discussion: Coaching and Mentoring SkillsThroughout this course, you have learned how important performance management is for both employees and organizations. You have also explored how important a well-designed performance management program is to ensuring an organization’s success. Part of its success also relies on the ability of the manager to have the skills necessary to effectively work with employees as a mentor (a relationship built on trust, focused on the person and his or her individual growth and career) and a coach (a method of training, focused on an employee’s performance, giving advice, and monitoring progress). Based on a manager’s personal style, there are guidelines available to help with mentoring and coaching employees to successfully meet the short- and long-term objectives in their development plans. These skills will help managers to ensure they are effective in providing the guidance, support, advice, and training necessary so that employees have the confidence to achieve the desired competencies.By Day 3Post a cohesive and scholarly response based on your readings and research this week that addresses the following:Evaluate the performance management approach that would fit you, as a manager, and your personal style that you believe is most important in executing this role effectively. Why are these important skills for ensuring the success of a performance management program? Justify your response with references to your resources.References- Ellis, C. (2004). Managing skills for new managers. New York: American Management Association International. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.Chapter 7, "Coaching for Performance" (pp. 115–134)- Schraeder, M., & Jordan, M. (2011). Managing performance. Journal for Participation, 34(2), 4–10.

Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.THESE ARE EXAMPLES OF 4 ARTICLES AND WHAT IT SHOULD LOOK LIKE•The article :Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention: A network meta-analysis. –Level of Evidence from randomized control trials (RCTs)in a network meta-analysis –65 RCTs of various types of support surfaces were used. The support surfaces was gathered as per their attributes and formedproof utilizing these gatherings. Meta-analysis was used to gauge the relative impacts and adequate positioning of the gatherings for the results of pressure ulcer occurrence and the comfort of the participants. –Incomplete data was excluded. The survey directed a hearty efficient survey, scanned for, and incorporated every single qualified investigation. It included facts in the research such as the “Using the NPUAP support surface classification system”, according to Shi, Dumville,& Cullum, (2018). •The article : Effectiveness of Pressure Ulcer Prevention Strategies for Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review. –Level of Evidence level II and level III. Random Controlled Trial design with post test, pretest and 2 group comparison study. The research utilized quantitative experimental studies, randomized controlled trials (RCT), nonrandomized controlled trials, quasi ‐ experimental. Different methodologies were used, for example, high ‐ protein diet with multivitamins, energized light, timing of a tracheostomy, and diverse instruction and preparing systems. These examinations by and large have yielded improved outcomes in counteracting pressure ulcer advancement ( Tayyib, and Coyer, 2016).•The next article Nurses’ knowledge on pressure injury prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool. –The outcome of the research showed that nurse's degree of information on pressure injury(PI) was about 28% to 74%. The significance of this research was improving nurses' degree of awareness and knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention was imperative for effective prevention of pressure ulcers. –The use of factual tools such as pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool (PUKAT) to conduct the research. The use of a researcher with expertise in meta-analysis to resolve conflict and clarity was effective. •The article: Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults. –Level II the use of cluster random controlled. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial and Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE and EBSCO CINAHL was used. Three sample sizetrials were used. Manual repositioning regimens was utilized in pressure ulcer prevention to re-convey weight between the body and the support surface. There was limited evidence available to assess the benefits of different regimens for the prevention of pressure ulcers –The research were audited for accuracy by two review authors As stated by Dalvand, Ebadi, & Gheshlagh,(2018), “One review author (BG) entered the data into Review Manager 5 software (RevMan) and data were checked for accuracy by EM”.