“Justice without force is helpless; whereas the use of force without justice is tyrannical.” – Blaise Pascal, Pensées (1660) (as cited in Horton, 2007)In this unit, you will explore the traditional and innovative aspects of criminal justice administration. To be effective leaders, administrators must be knowledgeable about all facets of criminal justice operations. As a result, you will be exposed to different kinds of state and federal justice agencies and to the differences between taxpayer-supported agencies and private security companies. This also involves understanding the differences between criminal justice practitioners (those who work in the field) and criminology (scholarly theories from academia).Criminal justice management involves complex administrative issues, such as developing hiring requirements for applicants, knowing labor laws and bargaining rights in unions, creating policies to reduce vicarious liability, and other important management issues. Criminal justice operations are much bigger than just running a patrol division or a jail because these encompass all facets of justice operations for public safety.When you are done with this unit, you will be able to discuss the following:Municipal, state, and federal agenciesPublic and private operationsAdministrative support servicesVicarious liabilityThe consequences of ineffective leadershipReferenceHorton, S. (2007, September 23). Pascal on the rapport between justice and force. Harper’s Magazine. Retrieved from https://harpers.org/blog/2007/09/pascal-on-the-rap...Assignment DetailsYou are a supervising administrative officer in a criminal justice agency. You learn that Officer X has reportedly been fraternizing with another man’s spouse. The man returned to his home and found Officer X in his bedroom with his wife. The man then went to your agency to file a formal complaint against Officer X. It is a violation of your agency’s policy for officers to fraternize with the spouses of other people. Officer X was reportedly off duty at the time.Administrative Scenario: You are in charge of the administrative investigation. You must identify legal, ethical, and moral character violations that occurred. Review the following interviews:Interview 1You interview Officer X, and he denies being in the man’s home with the man’s wife and fraternizing with her. Officer X said that Officer Y is his alibi. Officer X said that he was with Officer Y at Officer Y’s house when the alleged fraternization happened. Interview 2You interview Officer Y, and he initially verifies Officer X’s story. However, under interrogation, Officer Y changes his story, and he admits that he was not with Officer X and that he lied for Officer X because Officer X asked him to do so. Subsequently, Officer Y is no longer an alibi for Officer X. Interview 3You re-interview Officer X, and he continues denying fraternization and denies being in the man’s home with the man’s wife. However, when you tell Officer X that Officer Y admitted to lying for him, Officer X admits to you that he lied and that he did fraternize with the other man’s wife and that he was alone with her in her home.In a 3–4-page paper, answer the following administrative questions:Did a fraternization policy violation occur? What is the purpose of having and enforcing fraternization policies? Why do agencies have fraternization policies?Did Officer X lie during the administrative investigation? Did Officer X encourage Officer Y to lie for him?Is this merely an ethical issue, or does it also involve moral turpitude?When does an ethical issue rise to the level of moral turpitude?When does a moral issue rise to the level of criminality?If the media find out about this investigation, what will the public expect you to do about it?Sometimes, the cover-up is worse than the original act itself. As a criminal justice administrator, what is the best way to handle this kind of situation?