LEARN MORE...

Home
Documents
March 2021
9
575743 utilitarianism theory vs virtue ethics

575743 utilitarianism theory vs virtue ethics

Content type

User Generated

Uploaded By

GurEblnyCebsrffbe

Pages

Showing Page:

1/4

Running head: ACT-UTILITARIANISM AND VIRTUE ETHICS 1

Act-utilitarianism and Virtue Ethics

Institution

Name

Showing Page:

2/4

ACT-UTILITARIANISM AND VIRTUE ETHICS 2

Act-utilitarianism and Virtue Ethics

Utilitarianism theory depends on the guideline of usefulness; which is accomplishing

whatever brings most satisfaction and least sadness to the most excellent number influenced

by an ethical choice (Jonsson, 2011). All humans are fairly considered and normal rules don't

apply in this situation, just results matter.

Or then again let us think about Act Utilitarianism as an ethical hypothesis which accepts that

every personal activity is to be assessed referring to the rule of utility, does it make

individuals happy? At that point do it. Unluckily, Act Utilitarianism is imperfect. For

example, "Act Utilitarianism" is contrary with privacy and justice, permitting an innocent

individual to be dishonestly charged to the advantage of the many (Jonsson, 2011), and an

individual's privacy to be disregarded on the off chance that they are unconscious of the

culprit infers pleasure. Also, it requests fairness and does not think about reverse reasons,

expecting us to treat loved ones the manner in which we treat outsiders.

On the other hand, we may characterize a virtue as a quality of character, showed in a

habitual activity that it is useful for an individual to have. "Virtue ethicist focuses to the

position that helping an individual is practicing the character attribute of generosity." Virtue

ethics way forward is being a good individual (Jonsson, 2011). Someone’s character rises up

out of a "significant moral society." consequently, it is imperative representing a moral

operator's society which the person in question works.

"As indicated by Aristotle, moral virtue is a routine. You should reliably decide to do great

acts intentionally for the correct reasons (Jonsson, 2011). For instance, you can't be viewed as

ethical for getting a ball before it hits a kid in a soccer ball game, hence sparing that kid if

only you needed to get the ball and leave with it as a trophy to prove to your companions.

Showing Page:

3/4

End of Preview - Want to read all 4 pages?

Access Now

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Running head: ACT-UTILITARIANISM AND VIRTUE ETHICS Act-utilitarianism and Virtue Ethics Institution Name 1 ACT-UTILITARIANISM AND VIRTUE ETHICS 2 Act-utilitarianism and Virtue Ethics Utilitarianism theory depends on the guideline of usefulness; which is accomplishing whatever brings most satisfaction and least sadness to the most excellent number influenced by an ethical choice (Jonsson, 2011). All humans are fairly considered and normal rules don't apply in this situation, just results matter. Or then again let us think about Act Utilitarianism as an ethical hypothesis which accepts that every personal activity is to be assessed referring to the rule of utility, does it make individuals happy? At that point do it. Unluckily, Act Utilitarianism is imperfect. For example, "Act Utilitarianism" is contrary with privacy and justice, permitting an innocent individual to be dishonestly charged to the advantage of the many (Jonsson, 2011), and an individual's privacy to be disregarded on the off chance that they are unconscious of the culprit infers pleasure. Also, it requests fairness and does not think about reverse reasons, expecting us to treat loved ones the manner in which we ...
Purchase document to see full attachment