Access Millions of academic & study documents

594970 children witnesses in court

Content type
User Generated
Showing Page:
1/5
Running head: UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT 1
Unit 2 Assignment
Institution
Name

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/5
UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT 2
Children Witnesses in Court History
Young people and children who need to go to court as witnesses are frequently either
the casualties of wrongdoing or witnesses to violations. Young people and children may feel
restless about going to court and may require additional help and consolation from guardians,
carers or parents before they take part in court and during the legal dispute.
Young people were first permitted to furnish court with testimony in the 1895 when
the Supreme Court of United States allowed a five and half year old to be brought forward as
a witness. It is presently assessed that generously more than one hundred youngsters show up
in court every year. Amid developing attention to abuse in children and reports of nonstop
increased maltreatment cases, a Presidential Task Force on Victims of Crime suggested sixty
two changes, as well as some expected to benefit young victims (Pantell, 2017). In any case,
in spite of the team's suggestions, children stayed victimized and unheard in delinquency as
well as criminal courts.
A developing section of logical narrative on the physiologic as well as mental
repercussions of kids seeing and encountering violent behaviour, just like showing up in
court, upheld adjustments of court practices. To diminish pressure attributed by kids showing
up in courts, different accommodations were created, running from permitting kids to hold
soothing items to being joined by a support individual while affirming (Pantell, 2017). As of
late, exceptionally trained office dogs were permitted to give solace for witnesses. The
adjustments were tested legitimately, especially those endeavouring to permit kids to affirm
away from the nearness of the respondent. Outstandingly, in the verdict of 1988 Coy v Iowa
(Pantell, 2017), Supreme Court of the US decided that the broadcast between a respondent
and a youngster witness was against the 6th amendment confrontation clause.
Notwithstanding, in Maryland v Craig case in 1990, the Supreme Court of the US decided

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/5

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 5 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Running head: UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT 1 Unit 2 Assignment Institution Name UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT 2 Children Witnesses in Court History Young people and children who need to go to court as witnesses are frequently either the casualties of wrongdoing or witnesses to violations. Young people and children may feel restless about going to court and may require additional help and consolation from guardians, carers or parents before they take part in court and during the legal dispute. Young people were first permitted to furnish court with testimony in the 1895 when the Supreme Court of United States allowed a five and half year old to be brought forward as a witness. It is presently assessed that generously more than one hundred youngsters show up in court every year. Amid developing attention to abuse in children and reports of nonstop increased maltreatment cases, a Presidential Task Force on Victims of Crime suggested sixty two changes, as well as some expected to benefit young victims (Pantell, 2017). In any case, in spite of the team's suggestions, children stayed victimized and unheard in delinquency as well as criminal courts. A developing section of logical narrative on the physiologic as well as mental repercussions of kids seeing and encountering violent behaviour, just like showing up in court, upheld adjustments of court practices. To diminish pressure attributed by kids showing up in courts, different accommodations were created, running from permitting kids to hold soot ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4