Module 4:  Application of Theory to Practice: Discuss how the theory might be used to support nursing practice  (clinical, education, or administration).  Include in the discussion the  purpose of the practice application and how the concept of interest  might be operationally defined in practice.  Provide an example of how  you might use the theoretical and operational definitions of your  concept of interest in your future practice or research.  Include a  potential research or practice question based on the propositions of  your theory. Style & Format: The paper will be written using APA standards. The paper will include  a title page (using specified format), 2-3 pages of text, and a  reference list.  It will be double-spaced, written in 12-point Times New  Roman font, and have 1-inch margins.  Professional and orderly  presentation of ideas (precision, clarity, format, headings, grammar,  spelling, & punctuation) with appropriate citation of sources in  text and reference list is required.  Up to 0.5 points will be deducted  for each type of grammar, spelling, punctuation, or format error. Submission Instructions: Secondary sources such as, textbooks, literature reviews, systematic  reviews, dissertations and concept analyses are NOT to be used. Only primary sources and empirical research articles are to be used for this assignment. Submit as a Word document. Rubric Module 4 Assignment: Application of Theory to Practice  Module 4 Assignment: Application of Theory to Practice   Criteria Ratings        Pts          This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Brief discussion of purpose of practice application (20 pts)     20                    pts                                  Clear, correct discussion (20 pts) 15                    pts                                  Correct, limited discussion (15 pts) 10                    pts                                  Identified purpose without discussion (10 pts) 5                    pts                                  Purpose does not fit with theory (5 pts) 0                    pts                                  No purpose identified (0 pts) 20 pts     This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Brief discussion of how concept of interest might be operationally defined in practice (20 pts)     20                    pts                                  Clear, correct discussion operational definition (20 pts) 15                    pts                                  Correct, limited discussion of operational definition (15 pts) 10                    pts                                  Identified definition without discussion (10 pts) 5                    pts                                  Incorrect operational definition (5 pts) 0                    pts                                  No operational definition (0 pts) 20 pts     This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Example of how  theoretical and operational definitions of concept of interest might be  used in your future practice or research (25 pts)     25                    pts                                  Clear, correct discussion of use of theoretical and operational definitions of concept (25 pts) 20                    pts                                  Correct, limited discussion of use of definitions (20 pts) 15                    pts                                  Correct discussion of use of theoretical or conceptual definition (not both) (15 pts) 10                    pts                                  Incorrect discussion of use of definitions (10 pts) 0                    pts                                  No discussion of use of definitions (0 pts) 25 pts     This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of potential practice question based on the propositions of the theory (25 pts)     25                    pts                                  Clearly stated practice question congruent with theory proposition (25 pts) 20                    pts                                  Vague practice question congruent with proposition (20 pts) 15                    pts                                  Practice question with limited fit with proposition (15 pts) 10                    pts                                  Practice question with no fit with proposition (10 pts) 0                    pts                                  No practice question (0 pts) 25 pts     This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Style &  Format (10 pts) Style includes: Professional and orderly presentation of  ideas (precision and clarity). Grammar, spelling and punctuation.  Minimal use of direct quotes (1-2 max.) Format includes: Proper use of  title page (using specified format), spacing, font, margins, and  headings. Appropriate citation of sources in text and reference list.  A  minimum of 2 references are required. Up to 0.5 points will be deducted  for each type of grammar, spelling, punctuation, or format error. Up to  two points will be deducted for poor headings /insufficient  headings/formatting     10                    pts                                  0-2 types of errors (9-10 pts) 8                    pts                                  3-4 types of errors (8 pts) 7                    pts                                  5-6 types of errors (7 pts) 6                    pts                                  7-8 types of errors (6 pts) 0                    pts                                  > 8 types of errors (5 or less pts) 10 pts           Total Points:                            100

Explain the impact of reverse logistics operations of countries such as China, India, Brazil and Vietnam and how they contribute to the world environment, either positively or negatively -- choose one. *Written Communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

Using any resources available to you, write an outline for the validation of an analytical method done on an instrument of your choice. We are looking for you to write an outline of the above in your own words, and not just summarize an outline you find while doing research. The outline should include a description of the analytical method (including instruments, reagents, and chemicals used for extraction, preparation, and analysis of the analyte), a description of the analyte and how it is being extracted, what standards and controls are being used, and which parameters are being validated. Please be sure to describe in detail the component parameters that are being validated