Romania Case Study: Please review the video and follow the rubric posted below.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtReTQSm6ac&feature=youtu.beFor each of the case studies, students will prepare an assessment of between 1,100 and 1,200 words of text, 1.5 spaced. Each case study should have a separate bibliography including at least 2 references (not including the videos), using APA format. Header and bibliography does not count towards word count. Each assessment should have:TitleTopic sentence (a single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned)Situation assessment (What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?)Lessons learned (this should include not just the lessons learned by the consulting engineer as expressed in the case study, but the lessons learned by the student looking at the case study as a whole)RubricSummer 2020 Case Study RubricSummer 2020 Case Study RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle2.5 ptsFull MarksTitle present.0.0 ptsNo MarksTitle not present.2.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Sentence2.5 ptsFull MarksA single sentence or two which summarize the student’s understanding of the situation, the actions taken by the consulting engineer, and lessons learned.0.0 ptsNo MarksTopic sentence not present.2.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSituation Assessment15.0 ptsFull MarksThe following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?8.0 ptsPartial MarksSome of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?0.0 ptsNo MarksNone of the following prompts are addressed: What was the factual situation on the ground? What were the main challenges? What role could, and should, the consulting engineer play?15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of ESEM Principles15.0 ptsFull MarksESEM principles are mentioned and discussed in the essay.8.0 ptsPartial MarksESEM principles are mentioned but not discussed in the essay.0.0 ptsNo MarksESEM principles are not mentioned or discussed in the essay.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLessons Learned10.0 ptsFull MarksLessons of the consultant engineer and the student are present.5.0 ptsPartial MarksOnly lessons learned by the consultant engineer or the student are present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo lessons learned are present.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBetween 1,100 and 1,200 Words20.0 ptsFull MarksWithin given range.10.0 ptsPartial MarksWithin 100 words over or under.0.0 ptsNo MarksUnder 1,000 words or above 1,300 words.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper Grammar and Spelling20.0 ptsFull MarksNo errors or minor grammar and spelling errors.10.0 ptsPartial PointsSpelling and grammar errors distract from essay.0.0 ptsNo MarksSpelling and grammar errors make essay incomprehensible.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1.5 Spacing5.0 ptsFull Marks1.5 spacing used.0.0 ptsNo Marks1.5 spacing not used.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2 ReferencesCredit only awarded for the following two criteria if 2 references are present.0.0 ptsFull Marks0.0 ptsNo Marks0.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn-text APA Citations5.0 ptsFull MarksIn-text APA citations present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo in-text citations or APA not used.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Bibliography5.0 ptsFull MarksAPA bibliography present.0.0 ptsNo MarksNo bibliography or APA not used.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0