LEARN MORE...

Case Summary And Analysis Leadership

Content type

User Generated

Subject

Management

School

Florida Southwestern State College

Type

Homework

Uploaded By

758gevonf

Pages

Showing Page:

1/5

Case Summary and Analysis: Are Drivers or Smartphones to Blame?

Student’s Name

Institution Affiliation

Course Name

Instructor’s Name

Date

Showing Page:

2/5

Case Summary and Analysis: Are Drivers or Smartphones to Blame?

Introduction

The following paper is a summary and an analysis of various leaders and their position on

the impact of technology on societies. In this case, the paper is a critical evaluation of social

corporate responsibility and its significance in the advancement of technological innovations.

Major findings include the efficacy of unbiased comments in the development of collaborative

technologies. Other findings include the significance of involving all organizational stakeholders

in developing sustainable technological products. Social responsibility is therefore critical in

developing an ethical behavioral response to technology.

Summary

The case is a critical evaluation of who is to blame for the resultant effects of technology

use – Periodic accidents. The company’s technology chief, Olivia, argues that technology has a

significant role in the advancement of societies (DuBrin, 2019). She argues that technological

advancements through smart devices enhance the productivity and connectivity of persons.

Raphael, the company’s CEO, echoes these sentiments by advocating for technological

innovations that enhance information sharing (DuBrin, 2019). The company’s marketing

manager, Derek, is of the contrary opinion and believes that these technological advancements

play a significant role in propagating accidents (DuBrin, 2019). The manager, therefore,

advocates for a change in tact particularly reshaping the company’s technological role. The

targeted resultant effect is the reduction in accidents. On the flipside, Raphael (the company’s

CEO), argues that other stakeholders have an instrumental role in mitigating the effects of

technology rather than the transfer of responsibility to one institution.

Response to Questions

Showing Page:

3/5

End of Preview - Want to read all 5 pages?

Access Now

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1 Case Summary and Analysis: Are Drivers or Smartphones to Blame? Student’s Name Institution Affiliation Course Name Instructor’s Name Date 2 Case Summary and Analysis: Are Drivers or Smartphones to Blame? Introduction The following paper is a summary and an analysis of various leaders and their position on the impact of technology on societies. In this case, the paper is a critical evaluation of social corporate responsibility and its significance in the advancement of technological innovations. Major findings include the efficacy of unbiased comments in the development of collaborative technologies. Other findings include the significance of involving all organizational stakeholders in developing sustainable technological products. Social responsibility is therefore critical in developing an ethical behavioral response to technology. Summary The case is a critical evaluation of who is to blame for the resultant effects of technology use – Periodic accidents. The company’s technology chief, Olivia, argues that technology has a significant role in the advancement of societies (DuBrin, 2019). She argues that technological advancements through smart devices enhance the productivity and connectivity of persons. Raphael, the company’s CEO, echoes these sentiments by advocating for technological innovations that enhance information sharing (DuBrin, 2019). The company’s marketing manager, Derek, is of the contrary opinion and believes that these technological advanc ...
Purchase document to see full attachment

Tags: impact of technology Information Sharing advancement of societies Drivers or Smartphones unbiased comments