For this discussion, you will explore the relationship between financial analysis and strategic analysis in a review of the case study Kering SA: Probing the Performance Gap with LVMH (Case #2 from your textbook). Read: Chapter 2, “Putting Performance Analysis into Practice.” A case study is a puzzle to be solved, so before reading and answering the specific questions, develop your proposed solution by following these five steps: Read the case study to identify the key issues and underlying issues. These issues are the principles and concepts of the course area which apply to the situation described in the case study. Record the facts from the case study which are relevant to the principles and concepts of the course area issues. The case may have extraneous information not relevant to the current course area. Your ability to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information is an important aspect of case analysis, as it will inform the focus of your answers. Describe in detail the actions that would address or correct the situation. Consider how you would support your solution with examples from experience or current real-life examples or cases from textbooks. Complete this initial analysis and then read the discussion questions. Typically, you will already have the answers to the questions, but with a broader consideration. At this point, you can add the details and/or analytical tools required to solve the case. In an original post, present a well-written answer and diagnosis for the following case study questions: How well is Kering performing relative to LVMH? From (a) the financial data and (b) what we know about Kering’s businesses, can we identify the sources of Kering’s inferior performance? How are the shareholders and stakeholders affected by the performance? What can Kering’s management do to close the gap with LVMH? Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. You are required to reply to at least two peer responses to this week’s discussion question and/or your instructor’s response to your posting. Your replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to and evaluate/analyze the content of the post answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:Read “Privacy in 2025: Experts’ Predictions.”Read through the various expert predictions regarding the potential state of privacy in 2025. Select 1 prediction that you think is most likely to be accurate and 1 prediction that you do not think will come to fruition. Draw from the readings and your own experiences to discuss why you think your 2 selected predictions are either valid or invalid? What additional predictions might you add to the list?