Plan an interdisciplinary lesson that relates to a current event. Include in your plan:The grade and content area in which you are pursuing licensureA link to a news story about the current eventName of all content area disciplines that you are using in your plan and why you chose the other discipline as a corollary to your own. Make sure to choose more than one discipline, e.g. math and science or math and art.Learning objectives with the specific state standards to which you are aligning copied and pasted into the lesson. Standards addressed should reference your content area at least one other content area as defined in item 2. (You may refer to course 5200 or any other credible resources about learning theory.)Warm-UpInstructional Strategies: Explain how you will use high yield strategies to teach your objectives and guide the learningList of materials needed for the lessonLesson closure / Formative Assessment. Note you must address BOTH components in order to earn full points on the rubric. Your closure activity may include a formative assessment component, but if you are combining the two, you must make this explicit in your plan.Summative Assessment plan (include formative and summative assessments. Formative assessment may be informal, e.g. questioning strategies during the warm-up.)Provide a homework plan or a plan to reinforce the learning in classroom

Integrate evidence and client preferences when planning, implementing, and evaluating nursing care.Demonstrate knowledge of healthcare policy, finance, and regulatory environments, including healthcare trends.Design a holistic, client-centered plan of care that reduces risks and manages health alterations.Reflective QuestionsHow did you integrate evidence and client preferences in the practicum experience?How would you feel about integrating client preferences that may not align with your own values and beliefs?How does the integration of new knowledge of healthcare policy, finance, and regulatory environments impact the healthcare environment and your nursing practice?InstructionsPlease review the grading rubric before beginning your reflection on the above core clinical objective. Make sure to answer the reflective questions thoroughly with substantial reference to your practicum experience.

Week 6 Assignment: Medical Ethics Case Study Debate Group Project Instructions and Grading Rubric Assignment Rationale: Please refer to the course syllabus to determine what percentage this assignment is of your final course grade. The purpose of this assignment is for group members to work together to examine a medical ethics case study and demonstrate knowledge of patient rights, patient abuse, informed consent, and the ethics of legal healthcare through an online debate project.  Assignment Objective: Review the videos on the Dr. Kevorkian, Marlise Munoz, and Terri Schiavo. As a group choose one case study to illustrate the principles of medical ethics, an understanding of patient rights and patient abuse, knowledge of informed consent, and the ethics of legal healthcare via a group debate within the case study while clarifying the duty of the healthcare facility to ensure competence. (LO 1, 2) Case Study Options: Links to video for case study choices can be found below. Keep in mind these videos are just a brief introduction to the topics for familiarization purposes. There is a vast amount of reference material available for all three cases. For example, Terri Schiavo’s case went all the way to the U. S. Supreme Court for a decision. The decision is publicly available on the Supreme Court website.  FranklinSprings. (2009, January 27). The Terry Schiavo story [Video file].  Each group has the option of selecting another case study. Each optional choice will have to be approved by the instructor. Please send an email to the instructor and include information about the case study selection. Keep in mind there must be both ethical and legal implications present in the option. case study selected.