Read the Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Units case study starting on p. 335, Ch. 11 of Criminal Justice Organizations. Note: Access the case study via the Criminal Justice Organizations Case Study link in the Wk 4 Learning Activities folder.Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper answering the questions at the end of the case study. Emphasize strategies that could have prevented much of the conflict that occurred in the scenario. Use the questions in “Think like an Administrator” on p. 337 for possible topics to cover.

Unit 2 Case Study InstructionsRead “Case 3-1, You Can’t Get There From Here: Uber Slow On Diversity” on page 108 of your textbook. After you have read the case study, write an analysis of the case study.Write an introduction to give context to your paper by explaining what the paper will cover. Then, divide the body of your paper using the seven headers below. Address the points within that section, as indicated under the header.Employment LawIdentify what employment law Susan Fowler’s sexual harassment claim would be characterized as. Be sure to develop your answer to include your rationale.Type of HarassmentIdentify the type(s) of harassment to which Ms. Fowler was exposed. Be sure to develop your answer to include your rationale.Uber’s ActionsIdentify actions Uber has taken to limit their liability relative to sexual harassment charges. Be sure to develop your answer to include your rationale.EEOC and Affirmative ActionAfter reviewing Uber’s diversity report, does it appear Uber is in violation of any EEOC and affirmative action laws? Be sure to develop your answer to include your rationale.Diversity MattersExplain why diversity matters in general and more specifically to Uber. Be sure to develop your answer to include your rationale.Benefits/Challenges of a Diverse WorkforceIdentify and explain the benefits and challenges Uber derives from a more diverse workforce. Be sure to develop your answer to include your rationale.Legal Provisions of Uber CaseWrite a summary that identifies legal provisions or considerations covered within this case study as it relates to a human resource management (HRM) perspective.Conclude with an analysis with your thoughts on how ethics and HRM professional standards are framed by legal provisions within a specific organization or industry (e.g., business, health care).Your case study must be at least two pages in length, not counting the title or reference pages. Adhere to APA style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is neededPlease make some of the reference from Columbia Southern University Library, https://www.columbiasouthern.edu/login-options

TASK GROUPSTypes of task groups include focus groups, trigger groups, quality improvement groups, and social action groups, among others. They can be formed internally to address an agency problem, or they can be formed across organizations and entities, as with a community coalition or delegation. They can be as small as a couple of members or as large as hundreds of contributing representatives, and be formal or informal in structure and process. With these variations come advantages and disadvantages and the activation of different leadership skills and techniques for the group leader. In this Discussion, you imagine yourself in the role of a social worker forming a task group among many agencies. You must determine the most appropriate task group type and procedures for the given purpose, as well as the most effective steps for implementation and governance.RESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. WEEKLY RESOURCESTO PREPAREReview the Learning Resources on task groups. Carefully read the scenario below and then consider the following questions: Which type of task group would you propose? What steps would you take to initiate and lead it? You are a social worker in a private, nonprofit agency that serves immigrants, primarily migrant workers and their families. The agency includes two social workers, the director, and a retired attorney who helps with referrals to lawyers who can provide pro bono legal services. The social workers link immigrants to various social, economic, and health resources within the border community. Coordination between these various resources (some of which overlap) is limited and creates challenges in providing the most efficient and timely assistance to immigrants. To address these issues, your agency has asked you to organize a task group made up of representatives from different local organizations that provide health and social services to immigrants (three food banks, a federally qualified health center, volunteer interpreters, educational assistance, housing assistance, an employment agency, and churches that provide financial assistance).BY DAY 3Post your understanding of the different types of task groups social workers may facilitate. Choose one type of task group model (from Chapter 12) and explain why it best addresses the issue of resource coordination among agencies. Analyze the potential advantages and disadvantages of using this type of task group for the scenario. Explain, step-by-step, how you would implement the task group according to the model you chose. BY DAY 6Respond to at least two colleagues who chose a different task group model. Provide respectful feedback on their steps for implementation. Identify another advantage or disadvantage of the type of task group. Then, explain how leadership of this task group may differ from leadership of a treatment group. Use the Learning Resources to support your posts. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list. LEARNING RESOURCESRequired ReadingsToseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice (8th ed.). Pearson.Chapter 11, “Task Groups: Foundation Methods” (pp. 336–363)Chapter 12, “Task Groups: Specialized Methods” (pp. 364–394)Zanbar, L. (2018). Can community task groups learn from the principles of group therapy? Links to an external site. Community Development, 49(5), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1530687Document: Treatment Group Proposal Template Download Treatment Group Proposal Template(Word document)Response 1 to AMH:Task groups are a great way for social workers to help individuals and communities in need. These groups can be used to provide education, support, and assistance in a variety of different areas (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). Social workers can lead task groups to help individuals accomplish a specific action or produce a product (Fernandez, n.d.). They can also facilitate groups that assist with job searches, housing, and legal issues. Additionally, social workers can lead task groups that focus on community development and advocacy, such as those that promote civic engagement or address social justice issues (Toseland & Rivas, 2017).Because it provides a comprehensive approach to resource coordination, the Mobilization Strategy model is an effective way to address the issue of resource coordination among agencies. It allows for the efficient and effective use of resources across multiple agencies. The model emphasizes the importance of collaboration and communication among agencies, which aids in ensuring that resources are used as efficiently as possible. Furthermore, the model provides a framework for agencies to develop strategies for allocating resources in an equitable and effective manner (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). The Mobilization Strategy Task Group is a valuable resource for coordinating the various resources available to immigrants, including social, economic, and health services. This strategy provides numerous benefits, including the ability to collaborate with multiple agencies efficiently and effectively, identify gaps in service delivery, and develop innovative solutions (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). Furthermore, this approach allows for the development of a comprehensive and holistic approach to providing the necessary support to immigrants. Immigrants can be provided with the resources they require in an efficient and effective manner by utilizing the Mobilization Strategy task group, ultimately leading to improved outcomes. The Mobilization Strategy task group is an excellent way to coordinate various resources such as social, economic, and health to immigrants. However, there are potential disadvantages to using this strategy. For example, the task group may lack the resources and expertise to adequately address the needs of all immigrants. Additionally, the task group may not be able to effectively communicate with all immigrants due to language barriers or cultural differences. Furthermore, the task group may not have the necessary resources to provide timely assistance to immigrants. Despite these potential disadvantages, the Mobilization strategy task group would be a great way to provide immigrants with the resources they need. A step-by-step how I would implement the Mobilization Strategy task group in order to connect immigrants to resources would be to first, identify the target population of immigrants and their needs. This can be done through interviews and assessments. Secondly, I would create a network of resources and organizations that can help immigrants. This includes both governmental and non-governmental organizations. Thirdly, I would create a communication strategy that would enable the task group to reach out to the target population and share information about the resources available to them. I would also consider creating a website or app that would provide immigrants with easy access to the resources. Fourthly, I would create a plan to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the strategy. Finally, I would ensure that the strategy is regularly updated to reflect the changing needs of the target population. I believe by following these steps, we could ensure that the Mobilization Strategy task group is successful in connecting immigrants to resources.Response 2 to JM: The design of task groups is to accomplish a common goal based on a specific need. It is important for the task group to be organized which is usually facilitated by a social worker. Toseland & Rivas (2017) emphasizes the importance of a task group must be organized to be effective. Task groups are effective if they are developed and implemented with a structure in which the members involved feel that change will occur, and a goal will be accomplished at its conclusion. It is important that the task group be engaging and have workgroups that focus on collaboration to be able to reach a common goal (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). At the end of the meeting, we must ensure that we summarize the progress and what will be discussed at the next meeting (Toseland & Rivas, 2017). Brainstorming is such an effective model in that during focus groups you have many vested members of the workgroup with a wide range of education and professional experience. The brainstorming allows all members to share their thoughts on goals that the task group is currently focusing its efforts on. It allows all members to share ideas and all members share their thoughts on where they are at and where they are going. After all members of the task group share their thoughts and ideas they would all discuss and brainstorm what would work and what would not work to assist them in being closer to the goal. Toseland & Rivas (2017) the task group members are welcome to share their ideas the facilitator is responsible to encourage members to share ideas toward the goal which is outlined at the beginning of each meeting. The advantage of brainstorming is the number of ideas that a group can generate toward a common goal. Toseland & Rivas (2017) this model allows all members to able share all their ideas and brainstorm as a group to reach a common goal. The disadvantages are some individuals are not receptive to other ideas and do not want to hear any other idea but their own. This is why it is important to have a structured facilitator that establishes rules at the beginning, so it is easier to intervene when this occurs. Toseland & Rivas (2017) things that can inhibit the group process is a member that does not want to brainstorm with others and chooses at some point to not participate. Zanbar (2018) shows how knowledge in group counseling makes task groups more effective in facilitating to reach of a common goal. This is due to the similar nature of ensuring that all individuals are respectful of each other as they discuss ideas toward a common goal.It is important for the facilitator to utilize brainstorming to explain the goal at the beginning of the group so that everyone understands their role within the group. The steps this learner would take during implementing a group would be:Ensure that all members are aware that we are all here for a common purpose.Allow each member to share their ideasThe team would utilize fun exercises to discuss and brainstorm ideas.Respect all members and understand that we are all there for a common purposeIf you disagree with a thought or idea, you would ensure to discuss your disagreement in a respectful way.The facilitator will assist the group in reviewing progress and how much closer they are to a common goal.