nstructionsIn this assignment, you will calculate confidence intervals for the quantitative variables in the Heart Rate Dataset.StepsOpen the Heart Rate Dataset in Excel and identify the quantitative variablesMake sure the data is sorted by category (e.g.male-at-rest, female at-rest, etc.)Use the Data Analysis tools of Excel to construct 95% and 99% confidence intervals for all 8 categories of the sorted quantitative variables. Excel will calculate the margin of error given as the “confidence interval” in the output. Use this margin of error to create your 8 confidence intervals by both adding and subtracting it from the sample mean (calculated in unit 3). This creates a range of values that is the confidence interval.Create a Word document, and use your calculated results to explain what the confidence intervals tell us. What do these confidence intervals tell us about our heart rate data? How would you interpret the 95% and 99% intervals for resting heart rate?Compare the 99% and 95% intervals and explain why one is larger than the other even though we use the same sample mean value.Additional Instructions:Your assignment should be typed into a Word or other word processing document, formatted in APA style. The assignments must includeRunning headA title page withAssignment nameYour nameProfessor’s nameCourse

Overview In the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, Zehmer spent the night drinking with his friend Lucy. During the evening, a piece of paper was signed whereby Zehmer agreed to sell his farm to Lucy. In this assignment, you will review the full case study in your textbook, analyze the contractual elements and ruling, and indicate whether you agree with the ruling. Prompt Read the Lucy v. Zehmer case summary in the “Elements of the Offer” section of Chapter 14 in your textbook, and the analyze the case in relation to contract law. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Identify the contractual element Zehmer contended was missing. Summarize the court ruling and explain the reason for the ruling. Agree or disagree with the ruling, and include a rationale to support your ideas. Summarize a personal experience in which you entered into a contract that you did not think of as a binding contract at the time. Consider which elements of a contract were in place and which were missing. Guidelines for Submission Submit your case analysis as a Word document. Write a 1- to 2-paragraph response for each of the 4 rubric criteria. Sources should be cited according to APA style.