Access over 35 million academic & study documents

Legal Process.edited

Content type
User Generated
Subject
Article Writing
School
Harvard University
Type
Homework
Rating
Showing Page:
1/4
Question One
When it comes to the Fourth Amendment, it ensures that an individual's privacy is
protected; the privacy is free from any intrusion from any government institution. 'Search and
seizure' Amendment extends to searches of items such as digital devices by the police.
According to the Fourth Amendment, the people’s right is meant to be safe when it comes to
their homes, around their devices, from senseless searches and seizures shouldn't be breached.
Digital forensics allows digital examiners to recover and investigate evidence in digital
devices concerning computer crimes. The Fourth Amendment regards digital devices as
containers and "effects." As such, the US Supreme Court clarified that the Fourth Amendment
protects the owners of every container that hides its contents from sight, as suggested in Riley v.
California (Harris, 2015). Moreover, the Fourth Amendment also recognizes private data stored
in digital devices as "personal papers." It protects the owners of such information from search
and seizure, as suggested in the United States v. Jones (Fakhoury, 2015).
Question Two
Exigent circumstances are situations that might cause a reasonable individual to believe
that it was necessary to enter a property to prevent bodily harm to law enforcers or other
individuals, the escaping of a suspect, the destroying of crucial evidence, or other consequences
that might frustrate genuine law enforcement procedures. Such situations negate the general
requirement of warrants as per the Fourth Amendment search and seizure as observed in
Missouri v. McNeely (Fakhoury, 2015).
Question Three

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
2/4
UFED refers to Universal Forensic Extraction Device, whose purpose is to retrieve both
logical and physical information from mobile devices like cell phones, including other hand-held
devices. The UFED service may also unlock mobile devices, conduct complete physical and
logical extractions and advanced unlocks. One of the primary reasons law enforcement can use
UFED is to search for both logical and physical evidence of a crime. However, they must have a
warrant to conduct such a search (Firdaus, 2020).
Question Four
CDMA and GSM are two fundamental technologies in mobile phones that no one can
afford to cross. CDMA stands for Code Division Multiple Access. It provides various protocols
in second and third-hand generation wireless devices allowing many signals to occupy one
channel of transmission, optimizing available bandwidth utilization. GSM refers to the Global
System, which describes the protocols for second-hand generation mobile devices, networks
(Neeraja & Rao, 2017). The main difference is that GSM is SIM card-based, while CDMA is a
handset-based standard.
Before introducing 4G LTE, the difference between GSM and CDMA was seen in the
SIM card. CDMA handsets didn't have SIM card slots, unlike GSM handsets which came with
the SIM card slots. Meaning, Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) was regarded as a
handset-based standard with a phone connected to another device. If one wanted to upgrade the
device, one had to contact the network carrier and deactivate the previous device and switch on
the new device.

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
Showing Page:
3/4

Sign up to view the full document!

lock_open Sign Up
End of Preview - Want to read all 4 pages?
Access Now
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Question One When it comes to the Fourth Amendment, it ensures that an individual's privacy is protected; the privacy is free from any intrusion from any government institution. 'Search and seizure' Amendment extends to searches of items such as digital devices by the police. According to the Fourth Amendment, the people’s right is meant to be safe when it comes to their homes, around their devices, from senseless searches and seizures shouldn't be breached. Digital forensics allows digital examiners to recover and investigate evidence in digital devices concerning computer crimes. The Fourth Amendment regards digital devices as containers and "effects." As such, the US Supreme Court clarified that the Fourth Amendment protects the owners of every container that hides its contents from sight, as suggested in Riley v. California (Harris, 2015). Moreover, the Fourth Amendment also recognizes private data stored in digital devices as "personal papers." It protects the owners of such information from search and seizure, as suggested in the United States v. Jones (Fakhoury, 2015). Question Two Exigent circumstances are situations that might cause a reasonable individual to believe tha ...
Purchase document to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Indeed
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Documents