MBA 640, Managerial Accounting Course Project Each student should choose an organization with which she/he is familiar, such as the place of employment, business patronized, or other situation and describe how that organization either does or does not apply the course concepts on a day-to-day basis. The following course concepts should be discussed: •Critical success factors. •Four perspectives of balanced scorecard. •Value chain. •Customer delivered value. •Cost of controlling quality and cost of failing to control quality. •Theory of Constraints. Grading for the paper is based on the following: •Introduction and background describing organization 10% •Discussion of course concepts in context of chosen organization 65% •Conclusion, including degree to which organization incorporates concepts 10% •Quality of writing, including citing sources; and organization of project 15% The written paper is to be: typed double–spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman and 12-point font, a 10-page minimum, with correct spelling and grammar, proper citation, references, with a cover page and organized with headings. Business majors can also avail themselves of all Lynn University Library databases and the business specific databases such as: ABI/Inform, Business Insights: Essentials, Passport by Euromonitor, and Statista. Directions to access: Go to Lynn University Website: www.lynn.edu Click the Libraries Tab Click Databases Click on the « All Subject » dropdown= Business http://lynnlibrary.libguides.com/az.php?s=43296 Rubric for MBA 640 Course Project Learning Outcomes 4 3 2 1 0 Provide an introduction and background to company chosen. (10% of grade) Student provides a well-reasoned explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides a succinct yet complete summary of the company’s background. Student provides a well-reasoned explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides an incomplete summary of the company’s background. Student provides an adequate explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides a succinct yet complete summary of the company’s background. Student provides an adequate explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides an incomplete summary of the company’s background. Student does not provides an explanation as to why the company was chosen and does not provide summary of the company’s background. Analyze the company in the context of the critical success factors (15% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the critical success factors and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the critical success factors but only relates them adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the critical success factors and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the critical success factors and relates them adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the critical success factors and does not relates them to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard. (15% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard but only relates them adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and does not relates them to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the value chain. (10% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the value chain and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the value chain but only relates it adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the value chain and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the value chain and relates it adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the value chain and does not relates it to the company. Analyze the company in the context of customer delivered value. (5% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the customer delivered value and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the customer delivered value but only relates it adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the customer delivered value and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the customer delivered value and relates it adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the customer delivered value and does not relates it to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality. (10% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality but only relates them adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and does not relates them to the company. Analyze the company in the context of the Theory of Constraints. (10% of grade) Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the Theory of Constraints and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the Theory of Constraints but only relates it adequately to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the Theory of Constraints and relates it well to the company. Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the Theory of Constraints and relates it adequately to the company. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the Theory of Constraints and does not relates it to the company. Conclusion, including degree to which organization incorporates concepts. (10% of grade) Conclusion drawn is excellent. Conclusion drawn is above average. Conclusion drawn is average. Conclusion drawn is below average. No conclusion is drawn. Quality of writing, including citing sources; and organization of project. (15% of grade) Writing skills are at high level with almost no errors; organization is excellent. Writing skills are good with a few errors; organization is above average. Writing skills are adequate with many errors; organization is average. Writing skills overall are below average; organization is below average. Writing skills are poor with remediation required and project is not organized.