Workshop: Qualitative Research Workshop: Week 9In this week’s Workshop, you will document your experience of moving from interview to data and compare your experiences of verbatim transcription and summary transcription. You will also conduct a peer debrief of your classmate’s interview while he or she debriefs yours.Qualitative data analysis begins with the onset of the data collection process. This means that your very first interview becomes the launch point for identifying codes (bits of data that have a particular meaning in the context of your research question), categories (groups of codes), and themes (groups of categories that share a specific meaning). The notes that you took during and after your interview will also provide cues and clues as to what the data will reveal about the phenomenon of interest. Remember to identify clearly your “notable” quotes.Consider that the intent of your interview was directed by your chosen approach. So, in your transcription and organization of your data, use the text-processing capabilities (formatting, styles, comments) to consistently indicate across data sources (your interviews, journal notes, audit trails) which question goes with which answer. Highlight the key elements that focus the approach you have chosen. The following are some examples:Type of ApproachWhat to HighlightPhenomenological What is seen/experienced (not interpreted)HermeneuticsUnits of meaning and intentionNarrativeTurning points of the storyEthnographyEnvironmental observations; stated meanings from interactions among culture membersTheory-drivenSensitizing concepts (identifying words and key phrases that epitomize the theoretical or conceptual framework)Grounded theoryOpen coding (identifying properties and “dimensions” of concepts)By Day 4Transcribe your first interview. Use a transcription service or do it yourself.For your second interview, use a summative technique (e.g., Halcomb & Davidson, 2006) of audiotape, interview notes, and journal notes to create a detailed summary.Provide your debriefing partner with the audio (if possible) and transcript of one interview.Write in your unique thread a statement in which you compare and contrast the two ways of turning interviews into data. Consider which approach gets you “closer” to the experience of the participant and which approach gets you “deeper” into seeing potential patterns and categories.Interview 1https://otter.ai/u/FnFBzOzdM5QR-4dqxj4wkikyHaIInterview 2https://otter.ai/u/jCGTXhleu6jt5FNrl3EsmSdLPnQ

Security Alerts The Internet has turned into an around the clock battle ground of attackers and attackees. It is estimated that there are millions of compromised computers and servers known as bots, which are distributed throughout the world at any given time. Bots are responsible for becoming spam bots, web spiders, DDoS attackers, and can be used for other destructive and illegal activities. To ensure that the Zeus Books web server doesn't become a bot, it is important the web server is secured and protected from being compromised through exploits and attacks. Zeus Books is requesting you to perform a web server security mitigation assessment. In the assessment, Zeus Books has requested that you provide three known exploits on the following products and the solutions to mitigate any possible attacks leveraging versions you are currently running the Zeus Books website on: WindowsHypervisor (the one you recommended in the discussion assignment)Apache 2.XPHP Based on your understanding of web server security, create a 4- to 5-page report in a Microsoft Word document answering the following: Discuss three known vulnerabilities or exploits on the technologies above.Discuss how you will be able to mitigate the known vulnerabilities or exploits.Discuss any security software or hardware components which should be used to protect Zeus's website.Discuss how you plan to monitor the Zeus Books web server for ongoing security alerting. Support your responses with examples. Cite any sources in APA format.

The length of the reflection is to be within three to six pages excluding title page and reference pages.APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered): Course Reflection Conclusion Note: Introduction – Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63).